Message could not be delivered. Error was: The email address is not available 
on this system

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

        [SF:LuckyDogDigital.com/josh]

Message contents follow:

Received: from mail.webboy.net ([63.134.198.25]) by luckydogdigital.com with 
MailEnable ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:54:29 +0100
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=wsg; d=webstandardsgroup.org; 
q=dns; 
        
h=from:to:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:content-type:message-id;
 
        
b=O/KMNCStnBBgqjQsf1pRfGbKDE3AuwAsNj1uyt58440ffamyLRUJVtTbRtT07EVcT+E/O3VSJM5z1yBJnu0sBA==;
From: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
To: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
Subject: WSG Digest
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:47:14 1100
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=iso-8859-1
message-id: <243916906_180014...@mail.webboy.net>
Received-SPF: pass (luckydogdigital.com: domain of webstandardsgroup.org 
designates 63.134.198.25 as permitted sender)
        client-ip=63.134.198.25
X-ME-Bayesian: 100.000000

*********************************************************************
WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST
*********************************************************************


From: Dennis Lapcewich <dlapcew...@fs.fed.us>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:20:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [WSG] Is pressing Enter to submit (or not) on forms an accessa=
bility issue? [SEC=3DUNCLASSIFIED]

Return Receipt
                                                                         =
 =20
   Your       Re: [WSG] Is pressing Enter to submit (or not) on forms an =
 =20
   document:  accessability issue? [SEC=3DUNCLASSIFIED]                  =
   =20
                                                                         =
 =20
   was        dlapcew...@fs.fed.us                                       =
 =20
   received                                                              =
 =20
   by:                                                                   =
 =20
                                                                         =
 =20
   at:        10/21/2009 08:20:47                                        =
 =20
                                                                         =
 =20





*********************************************************************
From: weblist99 <weblis...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:27:10 -0700
Subject: Re: [WSG] a table layout issue

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:23 PM, tee <weblis...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ore conservative as it's not making sense to use it if I still have to
>>> insert div in the cell for IE6 (7 too?!)
>>
>>
> You can see the final result here by adding two products to cart (use
> Firefox as I have not checked in other browsers yet):
> http://submarine2.etrivo.com
>
>
>
It's been almost a month that I am finally going to wrapping up this projec=
t
and is starting to perform IE browsers check. The code is based on Kepler's

http://www.coolphptools.com/tests/tr.html


 Alas, it doesn't work for IE. Turns out IE doesn't like "border-spacing".=
 I
have not checked it on IE8 but don't think this will make a difference.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png

Going to try Alex's method now.

tee


*********************************************************************
From: tee <weblis...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:32:11 -0700
Subject: Re: [WSG] a table layout issue


On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:27 PM, weblist99 wrote:
>
>
>  Alas, it doesn't work for IE. Turns out IE doesn't like "border-=20
> spacing". I have not checked it on IE8 but don't think this will =20
> make a difference.
> http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png
>
> Going to try Alex's method now.
>
> tee
>

Oops, no need to try, just checked, same issue with border-spacing.

http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png

tee

*********************************************************************
From: tee <weblis...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:11:05 -0700
Subject: Re: [WSG] a table layout issue


On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:32 PM, tee wrote:
>>
>
> Oops, no need to try, just checked, same issue with border-spacing.
>
> http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png
>

Sorry, wrong url.

http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing-alex.png


tee

*********************************************************************
From: "Chris Vickery" <chris.vick...@privacy.gov.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:11:02 +1100
Subject: RE: [WSG] Is pressing Enter to submit (or not) on forms an accessa=
bility issue? [SEC=3DUNCLASSIFIED]

Thanks everyone for the feedback. Lots to work with there.

Good stuff.

-----Original Message-----
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
=20
Behalf Of Oliver Boermans
Sent: Wednesday, 21 October 2009 8:58 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Is pressing Enter to submit (or not) on forms an=20
accessability issue? [SEC=3DUNCLASSIFIED]

2009/10/21 Chris Vickery <chris.vick...@privacy.gov.au>:
> In this case it's for an input field, not a textarea, and enter will stil=
l
> not submit (unless you tab out) so in this case makes it contrary to=20
'native
> browser behaviour'.

This would potentially create annoyance to users of Safari on an
iPhone or iPod Touch.
When you have a text input focused (in contrast to a textarea) Mobile
Safari displays a big blue [ Go ] button in the bottom right corner
which one would expect will submit the form (equivalent to hitting
Enter).
If Enter does not submit the form it will be necessary for Mobile
Safari users to leave the 'form mode' by clicking [Done] and then
manually tap the submit button. I would consider this unexpected
behaviour a usability issue at very least.

Cheers Ollie
--
@ollicle


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************



***********************************************************************
WARNING: The information contained in this email may be confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, any use or copying of any part
of this information is unauthorised. If you have received this email in
error, we apologise for any inconvenience and request that you notify
the sender immediately and delete all copies of this email, together
with any attachments.
***********************************************************************

**************************************************************
Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
**************************************************************





*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to