Thanks: [WSG] More on spam traps

2012-08-23 Thread coder
Thanks folks. I know nothing about server-side validation, so that's more learning for me . . . (or some carpentry, maybe :-) Bob *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

[WSG] More on spam traps

2012-08-22 Thread coder
Hi All, I have recently attempted to 'trap' spammers who use autofilling tactics on the site at www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk. This is written in html5 and uses a mixture of simple tests to validate the form. However, yesterday I recvd a mail thus:

Re: [WSG] More on spam traps

2012-08-22 Thread Ken Robinson
Sender: li...@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:37:51 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Reply-to: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] More on spam traps Hi All, I have recently attempted to 'trap' spammers who use autofilling tactics on the site at www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk

Re: [WSG] More on spam traps

2012-08-22 Thread Oliver Boermans
Hi Bob, A few points: - The form submission was likely posted without JavaScript - There is no point confronting a robot with the reality of it’s existence Look into writing a filter on your email inbox or server that can eliminate such messages without your intervention. Don’t give up :) Ollie

RE: [WSG] More on spam traps

2012-08-22 Thread Mike Kear
...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of coder Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012 9:38 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] More on spam traps Hi All, I have recently attempted to 'trap' spammers who use autofilling tactics on the site at www.gwelanmor

Re: [WSG] More on spam traps

2012-08-22 Thread MJ Ray
Mike Kear I think its important to give the spammer no indication that you are onto them. If you give them any kind of feedback, they can use that to work a way through your maze.The filters i use (which are similar to yours on the client side, but I also use some tests on the server