Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think what would be more interesting is if browsers let you set your rendering mode (quirks vs standards).This would be really useful for testing purposes. However it would be even more useful when writing user stylesheets. I wrote an "accessible" user stylesh
I think what would be more interesting is if browsers let you set your
rendering mode (quirks vs standards).
This would be really useful for testing purposes. However it would be
even more useful when writing user stylesheets. I wrote an "accessible"
user stylesheet a while back that changed te
Alan Trick wrote:
If a free DTD
or CSS (or whatever would be required) was released, then mabye browsers
(besides IE) would conform to the non-standard standard.
Unless I'm misreading you, I think it's worth clarifying one thing: a
DTD alone does absolutely nothing. Browsers have some hardcoded
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:38:32 -0500, Alan Trick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It would be nice, however if we had some standard about this that the
browsers could at least be encouraged to implement. It might help with
the goal of making older sites "viewable in any browser". If a free DTD
or
To solve the issue of standarts-compliant browsers rendering non-standards-compliant web pages. Could the W3C create a 'Quirks DTD' for webpages that do not specify there own DTD?
-Alan Trick
Well, that's basically what is happening...just that browsers have
different interpretation of what
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To solve the issue of standarts-compliant browsers rendering
> non-standards-compliant web pages. Could the W3C create a
> 'Quirks DTD'
> for webpages that do not specify there own DTD?
Well, that's basically what is happening...just that browsers have different
i
To solve the issue of standarts-compliant browsers rendering
non-standards-compliant web pages. Could the W3C create a 'Quirks DTD'
for webpages that do not specify there own DTD?
-Alan Trick
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup
