Re: [WSG] Screen readers, flash, DOM

Sorry, I didn't mean to be patronising. Oh, I didn't feel it this way, I really appreciate it, I'm sorry if it sounded ungrateful. I've no idea if that's typical. I was under the impression that IE comes with the Flash plugin installed by default, but I don't know that for sure. I've never i

Re: [WSG] Screen readers, flash, DOM

Hi Jan, On 15/08/05, Jan Brasna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some screen readers sit on top of browsers like IE. If IE has Flash > > embedded in it, and the Flash has been made accessible (see > > ), then it's exposed to the > > screen reader. The reason

Re: [WSG] Screen readers, flash, DOM

Some screen readers sit on top of browsers like IE. If IE has Flash embedded in it, and the Flash has been made accessible (see ), then it's exposed to the screen reader. The reason that screen readers should have access to Flash is that developers sometime

Re: [WSG] Screen readers, flash, DOM

Hi Jan, > Maybe strange questions - Do the users of screen readers have flash? (I > have no idea for a reason why they shloud) Some screen readers sit on top of browsers like IE. If IE has Flash embedded in it, and the Flash has been made accessible (see )

[WSG] Screen readers, flash, DOM

Howdy. Maybe strange questions - Do the users of screen readers have flash? (I have no idea for a reason why they shloud) - And do the screen readers read the elements from the document, even if they're not in DOM? The reason I ask this - I'm including a flash header via UFO v1.0 [1], based