On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
or even what makes a good usability consultant

Perhaps, but I think what makes for usability itself should be a concern to us all. What are standards for after all? Is writing valid code an end in itself, or a means to an end? As I see it, it must be a means to an end, and that end is usability. Standards compliance tends towards maximising accessibility, and accessibility is the gatekeeper of usability: if a site is inaccessible then by definition it's unusable. Unfortunately, however, just because site is accessible, it is not necessarily usable. (The maze at Hampton Court is certainly accessible to almost any group I can think of - does that make it an ideal model for, say, the lobby of a bank?)

But, standards are continually developing, and browsers are not all standards compliant and interpret standards differently.

Tables for layout are anathema around here, right? But you can still write a table-layout page that validates?

The recent long discussion of the semantic value of <hr> was interesting to me because I felt the real question being discussed was what is the USE of <hr>.

So, is a compliant site that validates without error *by definition* accessible? I think not. Usable? Still less.

Conversely, would a highly usable site *necessarily* validate without error?

In an ideal future world we will deal with browsers that consistently display standards compliant sites, while at the same time still negotiating successfully with the millions (billions?) of pages that pay absolutely no heed to the very idea of standards. I'm not holding my breath...

My point (finally) is this:

Are there situations in which standards can be compromised in the name of usability?

Andrew

109B SE 4th Av
Gainesville
FL 32601

Cell: 352-870-6661

http://www.andrewmaben.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"In a well designed user interface, the user should not need instructions."








*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to