Re: [WSG] While we're on the subject of validators...

2007-05-01 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On May 1, 2007, at 2:40 PM, John Horner wrote: Well perhaps your second point is valid (and well formed) but this example: body { background: url('image.gif')no-repeat top } isn't just about cross-browser compatiblity. Surely without the whitespace, it's actually invalid CSS? The same as

[WSG] While we're on the subject of validators...

2007-04-30 Thread John Horner
I recently came across two niggling CSS errors: 1) body { background: url('image.gif')no-repeat top } Here, the coder has left no whitespace after the URL in the shorthand background declaration. Firefox is OK with it, IE doesn't display the image. 2) #right navbar

RE: [WSG] While we're on the subject of validators...

2007-04-30 Thread John Horner
It's CSS validator. It doesn't validate cross-browser compatability or the logic (or existence of) of HTML tags. Well perhaps your second point is valid (and well formed) but this example: body { background: url('image.gif')no-repeat top } isn't just about cross-browser compatiblity.