Those tools should be accurate for text-only combinations that don't use
transparency*, but I don't think they can detect the contents of images.
Regardless, if you need something that works absolutely on the final rendered
result, try
I need to pass a site for SC 1.4.3 and I was told some areas (especially link
texts) do not passed.
I ran the site through Juice studios Color Contrast Analyser as well as Color
Checker Firefox extension and they fail in some areas that I find suspicious.
Example, the site has #333 for body
Try a standalone contrast checker where you enter your own colour
codes/numbers. Remember that you need to take into account images may
be disabled too.
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 May 2010, at 11:50, tee weblis...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to pass a site for SC 1.4.3 and I was told some areas
Hi tee
On 3 May 2010 20:20, tee weblis...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to pass a site for SC 1.4.3 and I was told some areas (especially link
texts) do not passed.
I ran the site through Juice studios Color Contrast Analyser as well as
Color Checker Firefox extension and they fail in some
So my question, how accurate is for Juicestudios Color Contrast Analyser
and Color Checker Firefox extension? Will the brightness of monitor affect
the result.
Those tools should be accurate for text-only combinations that don't use
transparency*, but I don't think they can detect the
