Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread designer
Thanks Gentlemen - I thought so! Bob *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***

Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread Edward Lynn
I've personally never had to use that Bob. There's an explanation here... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2025786/why-use-meta-tag-content-style-type-for-external-css But personally I dont feel it's at all necessary Ed On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:58 PM, designer wrote: > Sorry if this is obv

Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread aleagi
I think this page can help you: http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/metatags.detail.html Best Regards, ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ ,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°` Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes `°º¤ø,¸¸, http://sapiensdc.com.br | http://eopen.com.br Desenvolvedor Web - Padrões W3C, Drupal, Acessibilidade ¸

Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread David Dorward
On 1 Jul 2010, at 12:58, designer wrote: > Sorry if this is obvious, but could someone explain to me the value of using: > > > > a) what exactly it does, It specifies the style sheet language (e.g. CSS or JSSS) for inline style **attributes**. > b) what is 'missing' if it isn't there? I don

[WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread designer
Sorry if this is obvious, but could someone explain to me the value of using: In the section of a page. I can't grasp: a) what exactly it does, b) what is 'missing' if it isn't there? etc. Please. Thanks, Bob *** List