[WSG] display: inline-block: valid or not? W3C validator says not.

2005-08-15 Thread SunUp
My style sheet contains this line: .clearfix {display: inline-block;} When I validate I get one error: Invalid number : display inline-block is not a display value : inline-block The word display links to http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#propdef-display. That's CSS2, right? I then

RE: [WSG] display: inline-block: valid or not? W3C validator says not.

2005-08-15 Thread Jason Turnbull
CSS 2 - W3C recommendation CSS 2.1 - Working draft Until CSS 2.1 becomes a recommendation, which shouldn't be too long (deadline for comments was July), the W3C validator will use what ever the current recommendation is. Regards Jason ** The

Re: [WSG] display: inline-block: valid or not? W3C validator says not.

2005-08-15 Thread Ben Ward
CSS 2 - W3C recommendation CSS 2.1 - Working draft Until CSS 2.1 becomes a recommendation, which shouldn't be too long (deadline for comments was July), the W3C validator will use what ever the current recommendation is. Just to be a touch pedantic, CSS2.1 only needs to become a 'candidate

Stupid Questions? (was RE: [WSG] display: inline-block: valid or not? W3C validator says not.)

2005-08-15 Thread John Foliot - WATS.ca
SunUp wrote: I do realise this is probably a very stupid question, and it's more than a little scary asking a stupid question on this list, but I'll wear the result if it means I can understand what I've done wrong. Thanks, sunny. Goodness Sunny, There really is no such thing as a stupid

RE: Stupid Questions? (was RE: [WSG] display: inline-block: valid or not? W3C validator says not.)

2005-08-15 Thread Patrick Lauke
John Foliot - WATS.ca There is no such thing as a stupid question (although occasionally we will see stupid responses...) You tell 'em John :) P __ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk

[WSG] RE: Stupid Questions? (was RE: [WSG] display: inline-block: valid or not? W3C validator says not.)

2005-08-15 Thread John Foliot - WATS.ca
Patrick Lauke wrote: John Foliot - WATS.ca There is no such thing as a stupid question (although occasionally we will see stupid responses...) You tell 'em John :) P As a point of clarification, when I say stupid responses, I meant in the form of condescending or mean responses, rather