I totally agree with you.
This is the very first time that I post here, I'll try to be more active and
participate with quality replies.
Greetings from Mexico.
Gregorio Espadas
gespadas [at] gmail [dot] com
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> The dis
Please do not teply to this thread either
Russ
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 15, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Matt Fellows wrote:
With no offense intended to the list moderators, I feel the
usefulness of this mailing list is diminishing due to an increase
in irrelevant and lazy postings.
...
Out on a limb here - does anybody else feel the same? If so, do you
have a s
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Matt Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Out on a limb here - does anybody else feel the same?
I really feel that you could have answered that question elsewhere, or even
with a quick search on Google, instead of lazily exploiting the goodwill of
this list...
With no offense intended to the list moderators, I feel the usefulness of
this mailing list is diminishing due to an increase in irrelevant and lazy
postings.
The majority of people on this list are genuine web developers, who care for
the future of the Web and the place Web Standards has in it. B
Please can this be closed? It's far off any standards related topic.
Possibly the only thing I can see as a relevant part of the 'Web 2.0
movement' is the abstraction of the presentational information from data on
a page, which isn't being discussed here.
If posting an off-topic message, pl
