RE: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread FLYNN, Joanne
Visit Australia's central bank website: www.rba.gov.au -Original Message-From: Universal Head [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 16:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags Thanks for the replies. I didn'

Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Universal Head
Interesting - so why do we all religiously add meta descriptions and keywords, not to mention all the other stuff? Curious. Peter On 26/02/2004, at 4:14 PM, Peter Firminger wrote: In fact, we believe that only one (not too significant) SE looks at them at all and they would be far down the deci

Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread James Ellis
Peter You can add your own meta data if you want. (take a look at the macromedia.com website - http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/ts/documents/fail_load_fp7.htm as an e.g). This makes it really easy for internal tracking of pages, internal searches etc - as Peter F said, the external use

RE: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Lindsay Evans
Universal Head wrote: > Thanks for the replies. I didn't realise they should be specific to > each page - I would set them up once and then repeat on every page. > > BTW, is there a site somewhere that describes them all? I have a few > I use that I only half understand - 'Robots', for example,

Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Chris Blown
http://literarymoose.info/=/synopsis/metadatum.xhtml http://literarymoose.info/=/destroy/metadatum.xhtml As with most of the Moose's work, this CSS technique only works in the most compliant of browsers. By adding an alternate style sheet you can actually view meta data on screen using this tec

RE: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Firminger
> PS. Not all search engines read nor care about meta keywords In fact, we believe that only one (not too significant) SE looks at them at all and they would be far down the decision list there anyway as they are perfect spambait for spamming the engines with incorrect metadata. There is some st

Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Universal Head
Thanks for the replies. I didn't realise they should be specific to each page - I would set them up once and then repeat on every page. BTW, is there a site somewhere that describes them all? I have a few I use that I only half understand - 'Robots', for example, and 'MSSmartTagsPreventParsing' P

Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Chris Blown
meta tags should generally be added to each page, listing keywords that are accurately relevant to the content on the page. Keep the list short and precise. Cheers Chris Blown PS. Not all search engines read nor care about meta keywords On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:16, Universal Head wrote: > Dum

Re: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Nick Lo
Hi Peter, Put them on every page of your site and ideally they should be specific to that page...as in "This page is about..." type stuff. Nick Dumb question but ... Do you repeat your META tags on every page of your site, or only the index page? Thanks Peter

RE: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Firminger
TED] > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 3:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [WSG] silly question about meta tags > > > Dumb question but ... > > Do you repeat your META tags on every page of your site, or only the > index page? > > Thanks > Peter > &

[WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Universal Head
Dumb question but ... Do you repeat your META tags on every page of your site, or only the index page? Thanks Peter * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *