Re: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad.

2005-05-13 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Thu, 12 May 2005 18:42:07 +0100, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used something similar on this site: http://www.csatravelprotection.com I don't see anything that would require tons of CSS on that page (checked FF nightly and Opera 8.01). Sub-navigation doesn't even change when

RE: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad.

2005-05-13 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 2:05 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad. On Thu, 12 May 2005 18:42:07 +0100, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used

[WSG] when navigation schemes go bad.

2005-05-12 Thread Drake, Ted C.
For what it's worth, I thought this style sheet might be interesting. We have a navigation that can be as deep as three nested elements. This style sheet is imported as nav.css. Each body is given a series of class elements (class=sub1 sub1sub1 asub1sub1) or something similar, depending on where

Re: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad.

2005-05-12 Thread David Laakso
On Thu, 12 May 2005 12:35:24 -0400, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth, I thought this style sheet might be interesting. [...] Thanks for sharing. BTW, Value for color#333 is empty(28 instances). David Laakso -- http://www.dlaakso.com/

Re: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad.

2005-05-12 Thread Mary Wright
Ted, Do you have a URL for a page that show's this in action? Mary On 12 May 2005, at 17:35, Drake, Ted C. wrote: For what it's worth, I thought this style sheet might be interesting. We have a navigation that can be as deep as three nested elements. This style sheet is imported as nav.css. Each

RE: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad.

2005-05-12 Thread Drake, Ted C.
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Wright Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:21 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] when navigation schemes go bad. Ted, Do you have a URL for a page that show's this in action? Mary On 12 May 2005, at 17:35, Drake, Ted C. wrote: For what it's worth, I thought