: [WSG] Accessible Open Source CMS
John Horner wrote:
I don't mean to be difficult, but I'm always baffled by this question.
A CMS, presumably, outputs the code you tell it to output. Whether it
serves up accessible/valid is completely up to you.
To put it another way, a CMS which won't
Tee wrote:
[XStandard] Mac version finally came out - a very long wait,
must be at least 2 year
It wasn't a straight port - we were pioneering new accessible UI and few
features such as authoring definition lists at the same time as we were writing
the OS X code. Whenever you're first to do
Anyone here try out exponent cms?
I've found it extremely to use, and administer, very simple to convert
designs as well. It uses smarty for the view output, and pretty much only
uses code in the actually files that control the design and layout for data
pulling from the database, not for the
On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:13 AM, Web Dandy Design wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone advise on the most accessible, open-source CMS between
Joomla,
Drupal or Plone?
Modx cms
tee
***
List Guidelines:
Tee G. Peng wrote:
On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:13 AM, Web Dandy Design wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone advise on the most accessible, open-source CMS between Joomla,
Drupal or Plone?
Modx cms
snip
Does anyone have any thoughts on Text Pattern?
http://www.textpattern.com/
Marghanita
--
Marghanita da
Web Dandy Design wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone advise on the most accessible, open-source CMS between Joomla,
Drupal or Plone?
No takers? I'll answer the question: Plone.
You'll need Python (pretty rare on servers as a whole) as opposed to the
far more widespread PHP to run the shebang, but I find
Hi,
No takers? I'll answer the question: Plone.
I'll second that. We've been using Zope for some time in my current
workplace and are now moving to Plone.
Plone comes out of the box with good standards support, although you'll
naturally want to customise the look and feel -- you can give a
On 9/12/07, Marghanita da Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee G. Peng wrote:
On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:13 AM, Web Dandy Design wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone advise on the most accessible, open-source CMS between Joomla,
Drupal or Plone?
Modx cms
snip
Does anyone have any thoughts on Text
Prochnau
bkdesign solutions
- Original Message -
From: Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible Open Source CMS
On 9/12/07, Marghanita da Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee G. Peng wrote
On 12/9/07 (14:55) Bruce said:
These and related are as accessible as their programmers make them. I find
them all difficult to configure for the reason that one is limited my
mambots, modules, plugins, etc which are made to add functions and wysiwyg
editors. All the code in the templates (if
This article may be useful:
http://juicystudio.com/article/choosing-an-accessible-cms.php
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com
XStandard XHTML WYSIWYG Editor for CMS
***
List Guidelines:
- Original Message - From: Christian Montoya
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible Open Source CMS
On 9/12/07, Marghanita da Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I do: use Wordpress http
On Sep 12, 2007, at 7:57 AM, Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
This article may be useful:
http://juicystudio.com/article/choosing-an-accessible-cms.php
Hmm, I wonder why they didn't include Modx. The survey was done in
May, maybe Modx (v 0.9.5) wasn't quite ready yet! The v.9.6 has
On 12/09/2007, at 7:13 PM, Web Dandy Design wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone advise on the most accessible, open-source CMS between
Joomla,
Drupal or Plone?
Thanks,
I'd encourage you to take a look at Silverstripe. It's flexible --
you have *full* control of the markup that it outputs and it's
Tee wrote:
Personally I don't think there is a fully accessible
WYSIWYG Editor existed that delivers pure clean code.
It all depends on how you define fully. XStandard has a keyboard accessible
interface and most definitely delivers clean, accessible markup.
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com
On Sep 12, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
Tee wrote:
Personally I don't think there is a fully accessible
WYSIWYG Editor existed that delivers pure clean code.
It all depends on how you define fully. XStandard has a keyboard
accessible interface and most definitely
I don't mean to be difficult, but I'm always baffled by this question.
A CMS, presumably, outputs the code you tell it to output. Whether it
serves up accessible/valid is completely up to you.
To put it another way, a CMS which won't allow you to output
standards-based code is by definition not
John Horner wrote:
I don't mean to be difficult, but I'm always baffled by this question.
A CMS, presumably, outputs the code you tell it to output. Whether it
serves up accessible/valid is completely up to you.
To put it another way, a CMS which won't allow you to output
standards-based code
On 9/13/07, Marghanita da Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From another perspective, could someone relying on assistive technology
contribute webpages?
This is what i always wonder with these questions, too. I can think of a lot
of examples where the administration/editing interface is
19 matches
Mail list logo