On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:20:04 +0100, Ian Fenn wrote:
I've launched my first website using web standards for a client:
http://www.housedoctor.co.uk/
Checking the website in browsercam:
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=98657
...it doesn't seem to be rendering quite right in IE5 or
This seems weird to me as the layout uses a fixed width centred div of
700px and html has min-width:700px specified + there's an extra
div#mozscroll which is also 700px so the browser really ought to add
scrollbars when its width falls below 700px ... or am I
misinterpreting min-width? Any ideas
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:08:29 -0400, Ryan Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems weird to me as the layout uses a fixed width centred div of
700px and html has min-width:700px specified + there's an extra
div#mozscroll which is also 700px so the browser really ought to add
scrollbars
Quoting Ryan Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That wort of seems like beating a dead horse right there. If something
has width:700px;, declaring min-width:700px; defeats the purpose.
Fair point.
min-width is the maximum allowed shrinkage a site will allow with a
resized browser window *before* it
Kay wrote:
I created a floating div and stuck them in that - seems to work, but I'm
not sure it's the proper way to go!
Thanks Kay! For me, removing a div seemed to work... but I'm not entirely
sure my css markup is as good as it could be:
Kay wrote:
I created a floating div and stuck them in that - seems to work, but I'm
not sure it's the proper way to go!
Thanks Kay! For me, removing a div seemed to work... but I'm not entirely
sure my css markup is as good as it could be:
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=98657
Hi Ian,
I had a similar problem with my site - I had some tables that refused to
display in the proper(desired) placement - they insisted on appearing below
the absolutely positioned element - way down the page.
I created a floating div and stuck them in that - seems to work, but I'm not
sure
