RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
Return Receipt Your document: RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest document
Re: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
Hi Richard, Very good work! Very nice web site! My suggestions: 1. The XHTML 1.0 recommendation states that both lang and xml:lang attributes should be used when specifying the language of an element. The value of the xml:lang attribute takes precedence. 2. The style attribute has been
Re: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
John S. Britsios wrote: Hi Richard, Very good work! Very nice web site! My suggestions: 1. The XHTML 1.0 recommendation states that both lang and xml:lang attributes should be used when specifying the language of an element. The value of the xml:lang attribute takes precedence. assuming
RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
sites need to be aesthetically pleasing as well as accessible and CSS and DOM scripting gives us more than enough power to do both. agreed, It would be hard to get customer sign off on such adesign, even soits quick loading and accessible. Perhaps you could sit down with a graphic
Re: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
2005-11-04
Thread
Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
Looks great m8 , only I would do a better header /logo that one is a bit fuzzy or it's supposed to be like that!? 2005/11/4, QM Consulting Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have been following this list with interest for some time and I am currently working on creating my web site. I've done some
Re: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
QM Consulting Ltd wrote: I have been following this list with interest for some time and I am currently working on creating my web site. I've done some testing on IE and Firefox and validated on w3. I would appreciate any feedback, regarding standards, semantics, usability, accessibility etc.
RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
Hi Richard, Your content is indeed usable, accessible, semantic and valid,but if I was a potential client of yours, I wouldn't be saying, 'Wow, that site looks great, I hope my site will look like that'. I'm not trying to put you down, I'm simply giving you my honestopinion. Now maybe I'm
RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Page Check: www.qm-consulting.co.uk/test/indextest document
