THREAD CLOSED
Please do not reply to this thread - it has already been closed
Russ
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting
d junkies)
Paul 'I miss Mozilla mail' Bennett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Worthington
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:23 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Plain text v HTML on this list
At 09:46
At 09:46 AM 2/22/2006, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
... could list members please use plain text for posting? ... kinder to
those who only have dialup connections ...
And those of us on slow supposedly "broadband" wireless links.
... makes the posts more legible. I, for one, tend to skip over posts
> Maybe we should take a
> poll to see if the majority want that implemented here. ;-)
THREAD CLOSED
1. Reason for thread closing
We have asked members on numerous occasions if they have problems or
On 22/02/06, Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All incoming HTML and other multipart gets filtered automatically to my
> trash, and so I only open what looks safe according to subject lines.
> Good thing for the subject key [WSG] or many posts from this list would
> never get opened, unlike
Terrence Wood wrote:
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
It can, but there are a variety of serious problems with Outlook that
make it an extremely
Terrence Wood wrote Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:02:32 +1300:
> On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
> > broken.
> Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think an equally big problem with Outhouse is tha
On 2/21/06 11:10 PM "Joshua Street" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
>> On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>>> Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
>>> broken.
>> Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
>
> I think Lachlan meant that + bo
On 2/22/06, Terrence Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
> > broken.
> Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think Lachlan meant that + bottom-quoting?
*
On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
broken.
Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I usually don't bother to read the 1mm tall text it sends out
(screenshots on request), unless I'm really interest
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
A frequent request, which occasionally needs to be remade: could list
members please use plain text for posting?
Yes, absolutely! The following articles discuss the various issues
further. Although they generally relate to USENET, most of the advice
applies equally to
11 matches
Mail list logo