Title: RE: [WSG] Siter Review Please
OUCH!
Mr. Meyer has a If you can't say anything nice, don't say
anything at all rule on his list. Is that in effect here as
well??
Perhaps a recommendation to http://webdesign-L.com would have
been nicer...
At 4:42 PM +1100 12/2/04, Cook, Graham R wrote
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:47:21 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to get some feedback about aesthetics and design on my site if
possible please and also the funcionality. Yes it is designed in tables but
still I would like some criticism please.
J.LinasDesign
To be honest dude that was not rude at all but that was probably the best suggestion that I have received thus far thank you.
J.LinasDesignGraphic Designerhttp://www.jlinasdesign.com/
On 2 Dec 2004, at 1:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to get some feedback about aesthetics and design on my
site if possible please and also the funcionality. Yes it is designed
in tables but still I would like some criticism please.
J.LinasDesign
Graphic Designer
Jason,
It looks O.K. The navigation presents no major drama. No, I am not sure why you've designed the site, other than self promotion, but is that an issue. I can't and won't comment on the coding - on the basis that the av erage punter doesn't care, so lojng as they don't get lost.
Peter
This is however the WSG mail list so you should comment on the coding.
Peter Blakey wrote:
Jason,
It looks O.K. The navigation
presents no major drama. No, I am not sure why you've designed the
site, other than self promotion, but is that an issue. I can't and
won't comment on the
In one word -
crap!
basic problems
include:
Use of tables
Fonts don't
resize
Use of images for textural
links
Erroneous map tag in
code
Use of one large image for Bio
details
No way to get back to home
page
Use of serif
fonts
No ALT
to wsg
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [WSG] Siter Review Please
This is however the WSG mail list so you should comment on the coding.
Peter Blakey wrote:
Jason,
It looks O.K. The navigation presents no major drama. No, I am not sure why you've designed
I'm far from the best designer around, but I'll try and give you some
constructive feedback.
1. From a design angle, the page is lovely to look at (see, we can be
nice here!).
2. Using tables for layout is totalyl unnecessary and totally against
what this list is about.
3. Use of spans when you
On 2 Dec 2004, at 4:42 PM, Cook, Graham R wrote:
In one word - crap!
Nah, don't stuff around... tell us what you think!
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for
, be they coders or not, should attend
a course on web standards and accessible design.
Graham Cook
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Natalie Buxton
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 5:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Siter Review
best ren voice
must resist feel a font debate coming on.. serif vs.
sans-serif. ughh!!! the pain!!!
/best ren voice
My 2 cents about people not really being interested in code. I disagree.
Totally. Good code for consumers [buzz-word for users not of the elicit
drug
12 matches
Mail list logo
