You can get clever and offer abbreviations and such - I believe the
attribute is 'abbr'? - but I don't have an URL handy.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/tables.html#h-11.2.6
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
hmm
well its bad idea to use table in my case.
I'll try to find a better way to list my hosting plans
maybe boxes module
ah its hard to build a good site heh
Thank you folks
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:34:58 +0100, Patrick Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get clever and offer
This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correct
inside a table. Instead of thinking of ways to convert it into divs, you
should be working on implementing accessibility features:
id, headers for, summary, caption, etc.
A rough example if id's and headers in action is here:
thank you Russ
you know what! I feel like you are the only one who can understand
What web is and what Web standards is
heh
Thank you mate
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:07:57 +1000, Russ Weakley - Maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correct
Thank you guys
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:21:36 +1000, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jad
That really looks like table data to me so I think its best to keep
it in tables. Tables are not evil in and of themselves, in fact they
are very useful in cases like yours. Its just when they
Sent: 07 June 2004 11:08
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] getting ride of table layout
This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correct
inside a table. Instead of thinking of ways to convert it into divs, you
should be working on implementing accessibility features
: Monday, June 07, 2004 5:59 AM
Subject: RE: [WSG] getting ride of table layout
That's a good one Russ, very handy, helps build a mental picture too!
Thanks.
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Russ
One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still make sense?
In the case of properly coded (read: with correct table headings, scope, etc)
data tables, meaningful linearisation should be taken care of by the user agent.
Don't worry about it...this should not, in my view anyway,
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:07:36 -0600, RC Pierce wrote:
One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still
make sense?
snip
nbsp; = Disk Space = Bandwidth = c.; =
Bronze = 400 MB = 7 GB = c.; =
Silver = c.; =
Gold = c.; =
Platinum = c.;
I haven't looked at the source of the
