On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:48:13 -0700, Ben Curtis wrote:
On Sep 16, 2005, at 1:43 PM, kvnmcwebn wrote:
browsers do not cache the images
linked from the stylesheet so caching is a little more work
wow, thats news to me.
I believe that's actually browser, singular. Who else, but IE?
Hi Ben -
browsers do not cache the images
linked from the stylesheet so caching is a little more work
wow, thats news to me.
I might have to rethink my tactics.
So even if a sitewide image was placed in one page as an img and on
subsequent pages as a css background it
On Sep 16, 2005, at 1:43 PM, kvnmcwebn wrote:
browsers do not cache the images
linked from the stylesheet so caching is a little more work
wow, thats news to me.
I believe that's actually browser, singular. Who else, but IE?
IE's problem will crop up (I believe -- someone
G'day
Is the img tag still widly used among list members. Should
we put as many of the images we can in the css as backgrounds etc.
Right now i put most sitewide images in the css and the page by page content
in with the img tag.
My approach is (generally) that purely decorative images
kvnmcwebn wrote:
hello,
Just Wondering-
Is the img tag still widly used among list members. Should
we put as many of the images we can in the css as backgrounds etc.
Right now i put most sitewide images in the css and the page by page content
in with the img tag.
IMG elements should always be
I agree with Bert!
Regards,
-- Cláudio Diashttp://www.mundonu.com
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:03 +0100, kvnmcwebn wrote:
Is the img tag still widly used among list members. Should
we put as many of the images we can in the css as backgrounds etc.
Right now i put most sitewide images in the css and the page by page content
in with the img tag.
I don't think
techniques like FIR of hiding foreground text and putting images in CSS
have problems in accessibility software
So the designer should use a smart IR solution.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The
Is the img tag still widly used among list members. Should
we put as many of the images we can in the css as backgrounds etc.
Right now i put most sitewide images in the css and the page by
page content
in with the img tag.
Content goes in the html.
Presentation guides for content go in
I find that centralizing images in css is useful for maintainability.
However, if page load time is an issue, it's a good idea to stress test the
site with both images in html and css. when they're in html, the height and
width tells the browser how big the image is which helps it load a little
10 matches
Mail list logo
