RE: [WSG] lotus domino vs doctype

2004-06-03 Thread Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st
/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of matt sawkill Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2004 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] lotus domino vs doctype Great idea, but i can't get it to work - Have tried window.document.childNodes[0

RE: [WSG] lotus domino vs doctype

2004-06-03 Thread Patrick Lauke
xhtml is the client's request - they don't see the point of undergoing a major redevelopment without being up to date (as an example to their own clients among other things). This was made clear at the start of the project but i gather that the technology decisions had already been

RE: [WSG] lotus domino vs doctype

2004-06-02 Thread Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st
With regard to the DOCTYPE, you could use a DOM script to re-write it, if you like (I'd be wary though - you might end up with more in-valid pages than not). I would first start with whatever the CMS can output easily (least work), if that's HTML 4.0 then go with that - as this is still a

Re: [WSG] lotus domino vs doctype

2004-06-02 Thread matt sawkill
Great idea, but i can't get it to work - Have tried window.document.childNodes[0].nodeValue = '!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN \n http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;'; and similar in ie6, but the document stays in quirks mode. Any ideas or working examples of a doctype

RE: [WSG] lotus domino vs doctype

2004-06-02 Thread Lindsay Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great idea, but i can't get it to work - Have tried window.document.childNodes[0].nodeValue = '!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN \n http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;'; and similar in ie6, but the document stays in quirks mode. Any