I use this tool a lot when I am optimizing my code to see how much I saved
(every byte adds time!).
Using this tool, you can see just how much fat there is in your code. I have
literally shaved off 50% off of some pages.
Unfortunately, while it is possible to build a web page that will get
Neerav blurted out:
This maybe OT, but should be useful to all web developers on the list,
because a site ight well be standards compliant but if it takes 30
seconds to load than its still failing ...
I wouldn't say it was offtopic. Something like this could be used to
demonstrate the
Robert Moser wrote:
Something like this could be used to
demonstrate the advantages of using CSS vs table layout.
The only problem I can see is images referenced in the CSS are not taken
into account
Jason
*
The discussion list for
Nor is the fact that stylesheets (and images, for that matter) are
cached. You're only comparing a first hit on one page. One of the
beauties of CSS is that once you're past that first page, and into
other pages on the site, you're not going to be downloading table code
again and again and
I think the reason for that is that the structure of the page is built and
the images can d/l while the the content is in place and the reader can
begin seeing something atleast.
This tool (which I discovered last month as part of a plug-in for Mozilla
and Firefox) sold me the rest of the way on
