[WSG] RE: Stupid Questions? (was RE: [WSG] "display: inline-block": valid or not? W3C validator says not.)

2005-08-15 Thread John Foliot - WATS.ca
Patrick Lauke wrote: >> John Foliot - WATS.ca > >> There is no such thing as a stupid question (although >> occasionally we will see stupid responses...) > > You tell 'em John :) > > P As a point of clarification, when I say stupid responses, I meant in the form of condescending or mean respons

RE: Stupid Questions? (was RE: [WSG] "display: inline-block": valid or not? W3C validator says not.)

2005-08-15 Thread Patrick Lauke
> John Foliot - WATS.ca > There is no such thing as a stupid question (although > occasionally we will see stupid responses...) You tell 'em John :) P __ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk __

Stupid Questions? (was RE: [WSG] "display: inline-block": valid or not? W3C validator says not.)

2005-08-15 Thread John Foliot - WATS.ca
SunUp wrote: > I do realise this is probably a very stupid question, and it's more > than a little scary asking a stupid question on this list, but I'll > wear the result if it means I can understand what I've done wrong. > > Thanks, > sunny. Goodness Sunny, There really is no such thing as a st