Re: [WSG] Interview markup?

2004-09-05 Thread Lea de Groot
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 14:53:46 +1000, Michael Nelson wrote:
 I mean, a definition list is really for definitions

No, I don't agree.
The W3C docs site two example uses:
- a standard term and definition usage, and
- marking up dialogues.
see http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/lists.html#h-10.3

Clearly, the second of these is *not* a definition, and is somewhat 
close to an interview.

A Definition List, despite its poor name, is useful for linking series 
of two elements.
A1-A2
B1-B2
C1-C2

(yes, also D1-D2, D3)

I think its perfect for an interview type layout

Lea
-- 
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems - I Understand the Internet
The leading a href=http://elysiansystems.com/;Brisbane Search Engine 
Optimisation/a firm
Brisbane, Australia

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Browsing without images

2004-09-05 Thread Marc Greenstock
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
just checked the various IR methods. your best bet looks like 
Gilder/Levin and/or the Shea enhancement
http://www.mezzoblue.com/tests/revised-image-replacement/

Hmmm... I like the Gilder/Levin method... Oh and sorry I haven't been 
keeping up with the old image replacement disscussion lately, I was 
taking a shower.

Thanks,
Marc.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Recap of free briefing for Education and Government

2004-09-05 Thread russ - maxdesign
Last Thursday night was our  Adopting Web Standards - Free briefing for
Education and Government.

It was a highly successful night with almost 100 education and government
developers in attendance.

Roger Hudson presented Universal Accessibility - with some very
interesting demonstrations. His notes (which do not do justice to the great
presentation) are here:
http://we04.com/resources/accessibility/

Dean Jackson from the W3C spoke about Web Standards in Education and
Government. His notes are here:
http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/dj-we04-edugov/

A more detailed recap here:
http://we04.com/blog/archives/90.htm

Thanks
Russ

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] scroll inside a page

2004-09-05 Thread Daniela Hoffmann



HiTed, Ryan, Jeffery an Peter,
everything works fine now.
I didn't trythisthis 'overflow:scroll' 
yet, but I'll keep it in mind if I wanta mainpage-scroll look likean 
inner scroll 'cause I guess hereone can style them together via CSS. And 
http://www.shauninman.com/mentary/past/ifr_revisited_and_revisedphpis 
great for horizontal inner scrolls when I need them.
Mysolution for now I found in the answer from 
Jeffery Lowder [Re: Links to Anchors in scrolling Divs, 31-08-2004] on 

http://www.squidfingers.com/code/dhtml/?id=divscroller2, 
here you can use images for the scroll andhave links for different 
scroll-units on the same page which I found a good idea to add (great 
script!).
And Peter, I'll dive into this later, I've tryed 
the validation and most errors are the missing ALT-tags on images (and all my 
'margin's - why's that?!), and I must admit I never really thought of blind 
people...
Thanks for all,
Dani


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ted Drake 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 5:19 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [WSG] scroll inside a 
  page
  
  Hi 
  Dani
  The 
  easiest approach is putting your information in a div and then setting it to 
  add scroll bars when the data overflows. I believe it is 
  overflow:scroll. I'm doing this off the top of my head and it could be auto or 
  another setting. You could also use css to style the scroll bar. 
  What you have is clean looking, almost flash-like. I'm sure there is a 
  cross-browser _javascript_ that will do a similar job.
  Ted
  
  Thorsten 
  wrote:you can use "overflow:auto;" on a div which results in scroll bars being
added as soon as the contained text/content gets too longthe proprietary scroll bar stuff one of the other posters mentioned is
colouring the scroll bars themselves, i believe, not "overflow:;".
  
  
-Original Message-From: Daniela Hoffmann 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 
5:06 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] 
scroll inside a page
Hi all,

I'm new to this group and allI 
knowabout webstandards is that if you follow them, it makes your site 
better browser-compatible.
And that's my problem: In my site http://home.uva.nl/daniela/new/in 
the page http://home.uva.nl/daniela/new/contact.htmI use some 
_javascript_ for a scroll inside the page that only works in Microsoft IE. 
How kan I check my sites about how far they 
(don't!) meet these standards, anddoes anyone know 
abrowser-compatible solution forsuch ascroll?

Thanks, guess I'm a humble 
beginner...
Dani


[WSG] When to start?

2004-09-05 Thread Dylan Egan
Hi,
I was wondering what would be the best time to start using XForms? 
Thankfully IBM and Novell are lending a hand to Mozilla to get XForms 
into the core and I hope this isn't a long development process.

I am unsure as to what I should limit myself to in terms of standards 
compliance and semantic markup. I am working on a project with a few 
people and they're sort of wanting to make a partial living out of it, 
whereas im in it for the coding and this is stopping me from adopting 
XForms straight into the framework because of their potential customers 
being a mass IE user base. I know there are a few plugins around for IE, 
but should I really worry if IE doesn't support something that is, in my 
mind, wonderful for the internet?

Im just thankful I could convince the designers to use XML/XSLT on the 
template side, which allows us to add more portability to the software.

Anyways, just checking in to see if anyone is adopting XForms at this 
moment, going with Web Forms 2.0, or going to just force themselves to 
adopt MS technologies.

Regards,
Dylan.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] web essentials briefing/ westciv CSS Guide

2004-09-05 Thread Kay Smoljak
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:43:36 +1000, Hugh Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If you're based in Oz however you'd be a fool to miss it.
 
 Why, though? The calibre of the people looks fantastic, but would it be
 worth spending $750 to see them?

I really, really, really, REALLY wish I could go, but making the trip
across the Nullabor is just not possible this year (moving into our
new house in three weeks time).

The calibre of speakers looks great, and from my experiences attending
MXDU these past two years, a major part of attending conferences like
these is the social and networking aspect. Where else will you get to
hang out with html geeks, standards nazis and css heads? You can learn
stuff just by osmosis.

Yet another reason to support conferences like these is to encourage
the industry to hold more.

Damn, I *so* wish I could go!

K.

-- 
Kay Smoljak
http://kay.smoljak.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] www.meetup.com launches standards compliant site

2004-09-05 Thread Neerav
the css for www.meetup.com is valid and except for a few small quibbles 
the xhtml is valid too

--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development  IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-05 Thread Mordechai Peller
I'm building an expanding menu and I'm trying to decide the best route 
to take. The idea is that by clicking on an item it will either be a 
link or open the sub-menu. The problem come in for the sub-menu headings 
and IE's lack of support for :hover. So here are the options:

1) dta href=#Heading/adt;
2) dtHeadingdt and use JavaScript mouse-overs; or
3) dtHeadingdt, CSS :hover, and feed JavaScript to IE via 
Conditional Comments?

The onclicks will be added through scripting and the close effect will 
be through CSS.

As I see it, 1) is non-semantic mark-up, 2) is mixing presentation with 
behavior, and 3) is a kludge. I'm thinking of going with 1) is it isn't 
totally without semantic value. On the other hand, 3) it tempting since 
it starts with proper separation, even though it uses a hack (though a 
relatively safe one).

If JavaScript isn't available the menus will either default to all open 
or use PHP.

So, what are your thought?
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Empty DT's?

2004-09-05 Thread Mordechai Peller
Related to my last thread (Fake link,...), I'm debating which is the 
better choice: using a consistent framework, but have an (usually) empty 
dt, or use a ul for the top level? Here's what the code would look like:

*dl
   dt!--optional Menu Heading--/dt
   dda href=opt1.htmlOpt1/a/dd
   dd
   dl
   dtSub-Menu Heading Opt2/dt
   dda href=opt2a.htmlOpt2a/a/dd
   dd
   dl
   dtSub-Menu Heading Opt2b/dt
   dda href=opt2b1.htmlOpt2b1/a/dd
   dda href=opt2b2.htmlOpt2b2/a/dd
   /dl
   /dd
   dd**a href=opt2c.htmlOpt2c/a/dd**
   dl
   /dd
   dd**a href=opt1.htmlOpt1/a/dd**
dl
The dt's are the headings and the dd's are the links. Very consistent 
and very semantic (except for the first empty dt). It may even simplify 
scripting because it's consistent.

The alternative is to use a ul for the top level:
ul
   li**a href=opt1.htmlOpt1/a**/li
   li
   dl
   dt**Sub-Menu Heading Opt2**/dt**
   dd**a href=opt2a.htmlOpt2a/a**/dd
etc...
In**consistent**, but no empty dt's.
***
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-05 Thread Kristof Neirynck
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:24:09 +0200, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm building an expanding menu and I'm trying to decide the best route
 to take. The idea is that by clicking on an item it will either be a
[snip]
 If JavaScript isn't available the menus will either default to all open
 or use PHP.

You've got php, right?
Create the menu as nested unordered lists.
Add a class to the current menu and have its submenu be visible with css.
#nav li ul{display: none;}
#nav li.current ul{display: block;}

The heading links should be normal links.
http://www.evolt.org/article/Links_and_JavaScript_Living_Together_in_Harmony/17/20938/

If you don't have any pages that represent the top level in your menu
you can still inform your server about the click.
a href=?currentmenu=contactcontact heading/a

You can add javascript if you don't want to make people with javascript wait.
Add event handlers onload and make them change the classname of the li
to open or something like that.
Then add this to your css:
#nav li.open ul{display: block;}


-- 
Kristof
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Browsing without images

2004-09-05 Thread James Denholm-Price
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:16:26 +0100, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You just realised it, but this has been a huge part of the whole image
 replacement discussion from the beginning.
 http://www.google.com/search?q=accessibility+image+replacement+css
 No, there's no way to test if images are turned off. 

If I read it correctly Peter-Paul Koch's DOM-based FIR does:
http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/fir.html

Neat -- loads a test image into the DOM and only does the
image-replacement once that's loaded. Dunno if the assumption about
screen readers not loading images is correct, though...

James
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Z-Index in IE - Got a problem need help

2004-09-05 Thread Jay Hills



Hello,

After reading DWWS (Zeldman) and fiddling around with some DOM 
script, I've got a series of tabs which when clicked reveal a menu underneath, 
using toggling of the CSS display element. (display: 
none; and display: ; is toggled).

I used Z-index 1 for the tab, and Z-index 2 for the content, 
so that the content will be above the tab and the content background will 
overlap the bottom of the tab for that "extending effect". 

You can use Mozilla/Firefox/Opera to see what I mean at http://www.ikonik.net/2/. It works in 
Internet Explorer but the tabs 'flicker'. Is this a problem with the Z-index in 
IE or have I done something else wrong with my CSS? link: http://www.ikonik.net/2/css/visual.css.

Any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance.




Snippets:
CSS:

#features .sidecontent {background: 
url(../img/iko/sdmid.gif) repeat-y bottom center;z-index: 
2;position: relative;margin-top: -15px;padding: 
5px 10px 10px;
}#features h2 
{z-index: 1;margin-top: 5;margin-left: 
0;margin-bottom: 0px;width: 
195px;background-color: #FFF;color: #666;position: 
relative;

XHTML:

 div id="features"  
h2a href=""  
title="Categories (View/Hide)"img src="" 
alt="Categories" //a/h2 div 
id="categories" class="sidecontent" style="display:none;" 
 
ul liTech and 
Web/li liArt and 
Design/li 
liThoughts and Life/li 
/ul /div
/div




Thanks again, it's probably something real silly but I can't 
work it out. I only have a flicker problem in IE.

Jay S Hills
www.ikonik.net


Re: [WSG] Browsing without images

2004-09-05 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
James Denholm-Price wrote:
 Dunno if the assumption about
screen readers not loading images is correct, though...
The main mistake in that article is that, for the most part, screen 
readers don't do anything on their own. They're pieces of software 
which run on top of the normal operating system. To browse the web, a 
blind person uses IE, Firefox or whatever, with screen reader software 
interpreting the output of said browser. Therefore, it's not about 
whether screen readers load images...it's about the browser that the 
user is running.

(caveat: there are older pieces of software, not completely screen 
readers but more like custom talking browsers, which can behave 
differently...but they're certainly the exception)

I'm not particularly fond of PPK's solution, as it only allows for two 
scenarios: CSS+javascript - to get nice image replacement - or bare 
bones text. No middle ground for just CSS.

As I said, the safest option are those techniques that cover the 
original text with an image, without hiding the underlying text via 
visibility:hidden, display:none or text-indent:-1000em or whatever.

Patrick
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Fake link, All JS, or CSS+Conditional Comments?

2004-09-05 Thread Mordechai Peller
Kristof Neirynck wrote:
You've got php, right?
 

Sorry, but your answer is irrelevant as it completely ignores my 
question. I wasn't asking HOW to make it work. I am already skilled in 
CSS, JavaScript, and PHP and the methods suggested by the evolt article 
are good for a beginner, but I find them flawed as they mix the behavior 
and semantic layers. My question was since IE doesn't understand the 
proper way, where presentation, semantics, and behavior are all properly 
separated (I think :hover is proper in the presentational layer as the 
behavior is already separated, but instead of through scripting, it's 
built in to the browser), which work-around is the least evil? In 
truth, I'm not looking for an answer, for I'm not sure there even is a 
right answer; what I am looking for are opinions. In the end I'll make 
my own decision, but with the help of other opinions I hope to make a 
better decision.

Thanks anyway, though.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Z-Index in IE - Got a problem need help

2004-09-05 Thread Jay Hills


Hello,

After reading DWWS (Zeldman) and fiddling around with some DOM script, I've
got a series of tabs which when clicked reveal a menu underneath, using
toggling of the CSS display element. (display: none; and display: ; is
toggled).

I used Z-index 1 for the tab, and Z-index 2 for the content, so that the
content will be above the tab and the content background will overlap the
bottom of the tab for that extending effect.

You can use Mozilla/Firefox/Opera to see what I mean at
http://www.ikonik.net/2/. It works in Internet Explorer but the tabs
'flicker'. Is this a problem with the Z-index in IE or have I done something
else wrong with my CSS? link: http://www.ikonik.net/2/css/visual.css.

Any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance.



---

Snippets:
CSS:

 #features .sidecontent {
 background: url(../img/iko/sdmid.gif) repeat-y bottom center;
 z-index: 2;
 position: relative;
 margin-top: -15px;
 padding: 5px 10px 10px;
}

#features h2 {
 z-index: 1;
 margin-top: 5;
 margin-left: 0;
 margin-bottom: 0px;
 width: 195px;
 background-color: #FFF;
 color: #666;
 position: relative;

XHTML:

  div id=features
h2a href=# onclick=toggle('categories');return false;
title=Categories (View/Hide)img src=img/iko/sdtop-categories.gif
alt=Categories //a/h2
div id=categories class=sidecontent style=display:none;
  ul
liTech and Web/li
liArt and Design/li
liThoughts and Life/li
  /ul
/div
/div



---

Thanks again, it's probably something real silly but I can't work it out. I
only have a flicker problem in IE.

Jay S Hills
www.ikonik.net

ps. For some reason 'MDaemon' (daemonite.net?) puts me down as spam so I can
never submit to this list usually.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Anyone know of any good DOM tutorials?

2004-09-05 Thread Seona Bellamy
Hi Michael,

No, :hover isn't an option since what I want to do is have stuff hidden when
you print it. I'm using Zeldman's toggle script, and I want to set it up
so that only expanded items will print (at the moment the headings of
non-expanded items also prints, so that you get a lot of wasted paper). It's
in a reports section, so logically a person printing the page is only
interested in the section they've expanded.

So we have something like:

ul
  li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(1)
onKeyPress=toggle(1)CategoryName1/a/li
  li class=noPrint
ul id=1 style=display: none;
  li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(2)
onKeyPress=toggle(2)SubcategoryName1/a/li
  li class=noPrint
ul id=2 style=display: none;
  li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(3)
onKeyPress=toggle(3)SectionName1/a/li
  li
div id=3 style=display: none;
  pItemName1/p
/div
  /li
/ul
  /li
/ul
  /li
  li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(4)
onKeyPress=toggle(4)CategoryName2/a/li
  li class=noPrint
ul id=4 style=display: none;
  li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(5)
onKeyPress=toggle(5)SubcategoryName2/a/li
  li class=noPrint
ul id=5 style=display: none;
  li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(6)
onKeyPress=toggle(6)SectionName2/a/li
  li
div id=6 style=display: none;
  pItemName2/p
/div
  /li
/ul
  /li
/ul
  /li
/ul

This is a cutdown version of the code for the page, taking out all of the
other details that show along with the ItemName, as well as the code for the
looping (I've pasted in two sets instead, just to give the idea), but it
shows the essential format. What I want is that if only the top set is
expanded, CategoryName2 will not actually print at all. So when a link is
clicked, as well as toggling the referred ID to visible, it will set the
class of the parent element from noPrint to Print.

Is that something that can be done? How do you isolate the parent element to
do something to it?



Seona.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Michael Nelson
 Sent: Saturday, 4 September 2004 8:45 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Anyone know of any good DOM tutorials?
 
 
 Seona,
 
 Is there good reason not to use CSS psuedo classes such as :hover etc?
 (http://www.htmldog.com/guides/cssintermediate/pseudoclasses/)
 
 I guess you're doing something more complex than the example below...
 
 On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 08:28, Michael Nelson wrote:
  Hmm... not sure about a tutorial, but adapting Patrick Griffaths DOM
  example for avoiding email spam at
  http://www.htmldog.com/ptg/archives/63.php
  
  would give something like:
  
  function changeClass(id, newclass){
  
elementToChange = document.getElementById(id);
elementToChange.setAttribute(class, newclass);

  }
  
  Then you'd need to associate this function with the element/event that
  you want to use... such as:
  
  document.getElementById(myMenuItem).onmouseover = function(){
  changeClass(myMenuItem, thenewclassname)}
  
  Actually, with the last bit I'm not too sure whether I'm mixing my old
  JS habits with proper DOM coding... perhaps someone more knowledgable
  can check it when they read this!
  
  Hope it helps!
  -Michael.
  
  On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 07:42, Seona Bellamy wrote:
   Hi guys,
   
   Anyone know where I can find a good, easy to follow online 
 tutorial on using
   the DOM to control elements on a webpage? Specifically, I 
 need to change the
   class of an element to a different class.
   
   Cheers,
   
   Seona.
   
   __
ella for Spam Control  has removed Spam messages and set 
 aside Later
   for me
   You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com
   
   ---
   Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
   Version: 6.0.749 / Virus Database: 501 - Release Date: 1/09/2004
   
   
   **
   The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
   
   Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
   To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
   
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
   **
   
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
  Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
 To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 

Re: [WSG] Z-Index in IE - Got a problem need help

2004-09-05 Thread Peter Asquith

Jay Hills wrote:
You can use Mozilla/Firefox/Opera to see what I mean at
http://www.ikonik.net/2/. It works in Internet Explorer but the tabs
'flicker'. Is this a problem with the Z-index in IE or have I done something
else wrong with my CSS? link: http://www.ikonik.net/2/css/visual.css.
Hi Jay
Once you've dropped down a .sidecontent menu, in IE6, if you click 
elsewhere on the page, the hidden element leaps to the top of the 
z-order. I think the problem arises from using margins to effect the 
overlap. Additionally, due to the order of execution, this is also 
responsible for the flicker.

If you use the actual positioning of the .sidecontent elements (say, 
top: -25px;) instead of deflating the margin then the strange effects in 
IE go away.

I've created a mock up at http://www.wasabicube.com/test/testover.html 
which demonstrates this working.

Cheers
Peter
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] Anyone know of any good DOM tutorials?

2004-09-05 Thread Lee Roberts
Why not simply set up your Print CSS file to print only
the main content?  If the person is only after that
information everything else is a waste of paper.

Everyone always tries to find fancy ways to do simply
tasks.  Shame.

Lee Roberts
HYPERLINK http://www.roserockdesign.com
http://www.roserockdesign.com
HYPERLINK http://www.applepiecart.com
http://www.applepiecart.com


 _ 
 From: Seona Bellamy [HYPERLINK
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 5:55 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: [WSG] Anyone know of any good DOM
 tutorials?
 
 Hi Michael,
 
 No, :hover isn't an option since what I want to do is
 have stuff hidden when you print it. I'm using Zeldman's
 toggle script, and I want to set it up so that only
 expanded items will print (at the moment the headings of
 non-expanded items also prints, so that you get a lot of
 wasted paper). It's in a reports section, so logically a
 person printing the page is only interested in the
 section they've expanded.
 
 So we have something like:
 
 ul
   li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(1)
 onKeyPress=toggle(1)CategoryName1/a/li
   li class=noPrint
 ul id=1 style=display: none;
   li class=noPrinta href=#
 onclick=toggle(2)
 onKeyPress=toggle(2)SubcategoryName1/a/li
   li class=noPrint
 ul id=2 style=display: none;
   li class=noPrinta href=#
 onclick=toggle(3)
 onKeyPress=toggle(3)SectionName1/a/li
   li
 div id=3 style=display: none;
   pItemName1/p
 /div
   /li
 /ul
   /li
 /ul
   /li
   li class=noPrinta href=# onclick=toggle(4)
 onKeyPress=toggle(4)CategoryName2/a/li
   li class=noPrint
 ul id=4 style=display: none;
   li class=noPrinta href=#
 onclick=toggle(5)
 onKeyPress=toggle(5)SubcategoryName2/a/li
   li class=noPrint
 ul id=5 style=display: none;
   li class=noPrinta href=#
 onclick=toggle(6)
 onKeyPress=toggle(6)SectionName2/a/li
   li
 div id=6 style=display: none;
   pItemName2/p
 /div
   /li
 /ul
   /li
 /ul
   /li
 /ul
 
 This is a cutdown version of the code for the page,
 taking out all of the other details that show along with
 the ItemName, as well as the code for the looping (I've
 pasted in two sets instead, just to give the idea), but
 it shows the essential format. What I want is that if
 only the top set is expanded, CategoryName2 will not
 actually print at all. So when a link is clicked, as
 well as toggling the referred ID to visible, it will set
 the class of the parent element from noPrint to
 Print.
 
 Is that something that can be done? How do you isolate
 the parent element to do something to it?
 
 
 
 Seona.
 
-- 
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.262 / Virus Database: 264.7.7 - Release Date:
9/3/2004
 
attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [WSG] When to start?

2004-09-05 Thread Justin French
Dylan,
If you have no worries about shunting out a massive percentage of IE 
(and other browser) users to adopt a new technology with very little 
support, then go for it.

Yes, that's sarcasm.
You haven't told us what sort of site it is, but there ARE 
circumstances where this would be fine (if you could guarantee browser 
support via plug-ins or browser choice, like a corporate intranet), and 
there are some sites that could get away with forcing tight browser 
restrictions (like a site just for your small circle of friends, all of 
which have the necessary browser requirements).

But the reality is that any site aimed at the general public needs to 
cater for the widest possible user base, without requirement of obscure 
plug-ins or edge browsers.

Justin

On 05/09/2004, at 7:37 PM, Dylan Egan wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what would be the best time to start using XForms? 
Thankfully IBM and Novell are lending a hand to Mozilla to get XForms 
into the core and I hope this isn't a long development process.

I am unsure as to what I should limit myself to in terms of standards 
compliance and semantic markup. I am working on a project with a few 
people and they're sort of wanting to make a partial living out of it, 
whereas im in it for the coding and this is stopping me from adopting 
XForms straight into the framework because of their potential 
customers being a mass IE user base. I know there are a few plugins 
around for IE, but should I really worry if IE doesn't support 
something that is, in my mind, wonderful for the internet?

Im just thankful I could convince the designers to use XML/XSLT on the 
template side, which allows us to add more portability to the 
software.

Anyways, just checking in to see if anyone is adopting XForms at this 
moment, going with Web Forms 2.0, or going to just force themselves to 
adopt MS technologies.

Regards,
Dylan.

---
Justin French
http://indent.com.au
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Brisbane Meeting, Wednesday

2004-09-05 Thread Lea de Groot
Wednesday 8 September (2 days from now) sees the Brisbane September 
meeting.

We are proud to have John Allsopp (WestCiv - well known for 
Stylemaster) who will give a presentation entitled HTML, XHTML, 
semantics and the future of the web.

Please make an entry in your diary and RSVP to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you haven't already done so - usual 
location, 6:30 start for 7PM.

Drop us a line if you like to come but aren't familiar with the 
location and we'll fill you in :)

warmly,
Lea
-- 
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems - I Understand the Internet http://elysiansystems.com/
Web Design, Usability, Information Architecture, Search Engine 
Optimisation
Brisbane, Australia
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Horizontal Scroll

2004-09-05 Thread Richard Czeiger
Hiya  :o)

CSS Question here:
How do I get a horizontal scroll bar in a DIV but NOT a vertical scroll
bar?

Cheers,
Richard

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Brisbane Meeting, Wednesday

2004-09-05 Thread John Allsopp
Lea,
can I just say I am very much looking forward to being there.
But just one slightly off topic question for any who lives in Brisbane 
or travel there frequently (please answer offlist)

What's the best way to get from the airport to the CBD. Taxi? Bus? 
Other?

Thanks, and see you in Brisbane Weds night,
John
John Allsopp
:: westciv :: http://www.westciv.com/
software, courses, resources for a standards based web
:: style master blog :: http://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/
 :: WebEssentials Sept 2004 Sydney Australia :: http://www.we04.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**