Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote:
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Yeah, I received dozens of copies of the message, what's wrong?
On 4/9/05 12:23 AM, Gizax Studios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Please, scott, I'm being spammed to death with your post in this thread
endlessly repeating in the WSG list.
Can you hold off the barbarian hordes for a while ?
Thanks
Lawrence Meckan
--
Lawrence Meckan
Absalom Media
Mob: (04) 1047 9633
ABN: 49 286 495 792
http://www.absalom.biz
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
I don't think it's him, because I only sent one copy of my previous message
and I just received two copies with the rest of the stuff from the list, it
may be a technical diffidulty with the list.
On 4/9/05 12:41 AM, Absalom Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, scott, I'm being spammed to
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote:
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Ryan wrote:
I don't think it's him, because I only sent one copy of my previous message
and I just received two copies with the rest of the stuff from the list, it
may be a technical diffidulty with the list.
I'm still only recieving one copy of everyone else's post on the list
apart from
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
