Helmut Granda schrieb:
I discovered something weird today. When I was creating my layout that
contains includes for some reason my rules would not work properly
only if the layout was like this.
-- code starts
Main Layout
div id=’header’
Include ‘header.php’;
/div
div id=’content’
I saw the Target Sued story over on Cnet (http://tinyurl.com/b3u29).
What was amazing to me was the response from a Mr Troy Gaddis in the
talkback section (bottom of above page under the title This is
Absurd. Here's a highlight:
Why do people with disibilites think they DESERVE compensation for
On 2/11/06, Paul Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw the Target Sued story over on Cnet (http://tinyurl.com/b3u29). What
was amazing to me was the response from a Mr Troy Gaddis in the talkback
section (bottom of above page under the title This is Absurd. Here's a
highlight:
Why do people
Christian Montoya wrote:
Sounds like he has no idea how simple it is to make a website
accessible. But that's not the big deal here. If you look at all the
comments at Cnet, you'll see that a lot of people agree with Mr.
Gaddis... which brings to light a bigger social problem behind the
fight
Far better to approach the problem by emsuggestingem/ that it's a
'good idea'
to do x and y because the resulting site can be visually identical but
more accessible.
Screaming and shouting and making money for lawyers is just fanaticism,
and
considerably discouraging. The answer, like
At which point does one's right to do as one chooses start stepping on
another one's right to access services?
I believe there is no right to access services. Any such aberration of
'rights' that necessarily violates the legitimate rights of others is
destructive to our liberty. The
On 2/12/06, Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At which point does one's right to do as one chooses start stepping on
another one's right to access services?
I believe there is no right to access services. Any such aberration of
'rights' that necessarily violates the legitimate
Designer wrote:
The objections
cited, such as the sarcastic suggestion that we sue the radio because
the deaf can't hear it, does actually make a valid point and highlights
the senseless extremes that one could go to.
The nature of radio itself is purely the transmission of audio signals.
Hi all,
I have a site that is pretty close to pixel-perfect in IE Firefox.
However, with Opera 8.5 I have run into problems with the layering of
floats. It seems 8.5 is not recognising 'position:
relative; z-index:n;' in the float layer. Does anyone know if this is
a recognised bug? If it is,
Lynne Pope wrote:
... It seems 8.5 is not recognising 'position: relative; z-index:n;'
in the float layer. Does anyone know if this is a recognised bug? If
it is, could you please direct me to a workaround?
It is a recognized Opera bug - which is fixed in Op9 previews...
I'd like to hear from folks who've used screen-readers:
What are the best ways to drill down into a nested list?
Consider a nested menu that's marked up as an unordered list
(UL). Select an item in the top-level menu and the page reloads with
a second-level menu of items opened up within the
Nic wrote:
At which point does one's right to do as one chooses start stepping on
another one's right to access services? Would we even *have* this
discussion if people being refused access to websites were black and the
refusal was because they are black?
I really don't see the point you are
There is no difference between refusing access to someone based on
physical/mental disability
and someone based on their race, culture, religion, etc. It's unnecessary
discrimination either way.
Lachlan, that was, actually, my point. Only people don't recognise that
refusing access to
Paul Novitski wrote:
When the page reloads the screen-reader begins reading the menu from
the beginning again.
Correct.
The user would have to listen for a new sub-menu, but without really
knowing for sure whether a new sub-menu had appeared.
Correct.
browsing with a screen-reader must
14 matches
Mail list logo
