Bob Schwartz wrote:
That's what I thought, but a few days ago someone made a snide remark
about them on a test page I had put up, so I just thought I'd double
check.
Was it because css was being used to indicate a cell was selected when
there was no data there (nbsp)?
I'm glad you brought
Chris,
Also, from you(?) (has been fixed), but there was a reference from
someone else as to the need for all the nbsp's that populate the
empty cells.
Bob Schwartz wrote:
That's what I thought, but a few days ago someone made a snide
remark about them on a test page I had put up, so I
Hi,
Thank you for your email.
I am out of the office travelling until Monday 19th March, and will have
limited email access during this time. For support related enquiries please
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], otherwise I will respond to you when I can.
Regards,
Andrew
Hello everyone,
I always work with PHP, use it to output my (x)HTML in the way i want.
Now a get to a agency that only work with ASP, i just can believe that
there's no way to avoid runnet_server, IDs with 1000 characters, the
some IDs on img, values of forms with 50lines height, and the form
at
I thinks this would help,
http://www.friendsofed.com/download.html?isbn=1590595335
DOM Scripting
he have somes examples it's allowed to download, in chapter 11 on
contact.html see the example.
And if u buy the book u will learn some good stuff .
On 04/03/07, Chris Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gaspar wrote:
I thinks this would help,
http://www.friendsofed.com/download.html?isbn=1590595335
DOM Scripting
he have somes examples it's allowed to download, in chapter 11 on
contact.html see the example.
And if u buy the book u will learn some good stuff .
On 04/03/07, Chris Price [EMAIL
On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Designer wrote:
So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:
Buy now,
Buy it now,
etc...
I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're
looking for would be:
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy
Andrew Maben wrote:
On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Designer wrote:
So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:
Buy now,
Buy it now,
etc...
I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're looking
for would be:
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 5 nowBuy Now/a
This is an elegant solution but has one drawback.
The title attribute is
From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're
looking for would be:
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
a
Apologies if this is slightly off topic, but I'm happy to re-post elsewhere.
A client wants to be able to create some draft page layouts that they
want achieved. Basically, they want a simple piece of software that they
can use to drag drop things like buttons, lists, input fields etc onto
a
Sounds like a job for the likes of Visio, or Illustrator. Since you
don't appear to need anything functional, I would avoid the complexities
of NVU or Dreamweaver.
You would need to spend five minutes providing the basic shapes, but
then it is all down to the user.
Mike
-Original
A pen and a yellow legal pad.
Lightweight, portable, can be used on the airplane, available anywhere
for under $5, available in a wide array of colors, understood by
everyone, supports annotations of all kinds, and is the same
sophisticated tool used by 99% of web designers world wide for making
I thinks this would help,
http://www.friendsofed.com/download.html?isbn=1590595335
DOM Scripting
he have somes examples it's allowed to download, in chapter 11 on
contact.html see the example.
And if u buy the book u will learn some good stuff .
If you (or anyone else reading this) are in or
Try Axure ( http://www.axure.com/)
On 3/12/07 9:15 AM, Nick Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies if this is slightly off topic, but I'm happy to re-post elsewhere.
A client wants to be able to create some draft page layouts that they
want achieved. Basically, they want a simple piece
If you use a Mac, OmniGraffle is a good tool for this purpose.
http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnigraffle/
On 3/12/07 9:15 AM, Nick Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies if this is slightly off topic, but I'm happy to re-post elsewhere.
A client wants to be able to create some
Chris Williams wrote:
A pen and a yellow legal pad.
hehe, or how about MS Paint? poor thing barely gets a look-in these days.
I think most of the comps I receive are done in word... Just find
something they know how to use already, save faffing around with any
software training and the
Subject: [WSG] Simple to use page layout 'tool' ?
Apologies if this is slightly off topic, but I'm happy to
re-post elsewhere.
A client wants to be able to create some draft page layouts that they
want achieved. Basically, they want a simple piece of
software that they
can use to drag
OneNote 2007 is pretty cool. It's sort of fits in with the legal pad
suggestion (smile), except it's electronic, and is closer to a spiral
notebook than a legal pad. Comes with a few ruled templates as well, and
you can use a stylus!
ByteDreams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
So, according the the site Georg posted, the world's most used
browser does not support the empty-cells property.
In light of that bit of news, would tdnbsp;/td still be
considered the wrong answer?
Shelley Purvis wrote:
No, they should be marked up as:
tdnbsp;/td
Bzzzt - wrong answer
Shelley Purvis wrote:
No, they should be marked up as:
tdnbsp;/td
Bzzzt - wrong answer -- the nbsp; is meaningless.
Meaningless under certain definitions but completely harmless. Besides,
an empty cell is already meaningless. Attack the very notion if you're
truly concerned about a
Bob Schwartz wrote:
In light of that bit of news, would tdnbsp;/td still be
considered the wrong answer?
pony warning
Of course!
You should _always_ follow standard, even when it doesn't work...
...but, if reality kicks in, then you _can_ use td!--[if
IE]nbsp;![endif]--/td and apply the
Barney Carroll wrote:
Meaningless under certain definitions but completely harmless. Besides,
an empty cell is already meaningless.
Excuse me? In any DB (or programming language) I use, a null value
is *not* equal or equivalent to a space character.
In any case it's certainly unambiguous
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Excuse me? In any DB (or programming language) I use, a null value
is *not* equal or equivalent to a space character.
Wo! Well said, Hassan. You're right, a string to replace null values is
significant. I take back my earlier point - a character could be
introduced
Barney Carroll wrote:
Wo! Well said, Hassan. You're right, a string to replace null values is
significant. I take back my earlier point - a character could be
introduced with JS, I suppose.
How is that any different? The resulting document is the same.
--
David Dorward
David Dorward wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
Wo! Well said, Hassan. You're right, a string to replace null values
is significant. I take back my earlier point - a character could be
introduced with JS, I suppose.
How is that any different? The resulting document is the same.
If somebody's
David Dorward wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
Wo! Well said, Hassan. You're right, a string to replace null values
is significant. I take back my earlier point - a character could be
introduced with JS, I suppose.
How is that any different? The resulting document is the same.
FWIW I don't
Barney Carroll wrote:
David Dorward wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
Wo! Well said, Hassan. You're right, a string to replace null values
is significant. I take back my earlier point - a character could be
introduced with JS, I suppose.
How is that any different? The resulting document is
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
How is that any different? The resulting document is the same.
FWIW I don't agree, the content layer would be *clean*.
So the user agent gets clean content providing it doesn't support
JavaScript. Great. Now all we have to do is make sure that no user agent
David Dorward wrote:
Intranet? Where did this start being limited to an intranet?
...
But HTML is not a presentation language, it describes structure /
semantics.
Internet, David. Honestly, HTML may be very nice indeed, but I'd
strongly advise against it for general purpose data-handling.
Barney Carroll wrote:
David Dorward wrote:
Intranet? Where did this start being limited to an intranet?
...
But HTML is not a presentation language, it describes structure /
semantics.
Internet, David.
Sorry, somehow I misread that.
Honestly, HTML may be very nice indeed, but I'd
I'd like to apologize for being snarky with my first reply. That's what
I get for replying before the first cup of coffee.
It's just that, in my experience, the time spent spec'ing and teaching
people to use spec'ing tools is better spent with a rough cut alpha/beta
running and people giving
Al Sparber wrote:
From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're
looking for would be:
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE
Barney Carroll wrote:
Internet, David. Honestly, HTML may be very nice indeed, but I'd
strongly advise against it for general purpose data-handling. Are you
honestly going to write these things in HTML, and for purposes other
than the internet?
When you say purposes other than the internet
From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There really is not an accessibility validator in the same sense
as there is an HTML or CSS validator. Accessibility is not black
and white. I believe your original code is fine:
h1 EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER /h1
a href=esim/btsa.htmlAbout the book/a
a
On 3/12/07, Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But clearly it's your client, and you have to work they way they want to
work.
this is not completely true. if you are an employee, then yes, but if it is
a client, not always the case.
they hired you to do a job and it is your
I *was* the early poster...
From: Dwain Alford
Subject: Re: [WSG] Simple to use page layout 'tool' ?
i agree with an early poster about the pencil and paper layout tool.
***
List Guidelines:
On 3/12/07, Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Iam working with the interface/html team and maybe the team that build
the aplications wouldn be so open to that changes, they say that is
easiest and quicky putting the native elements of .net tham building,
They're absolutely right, it is easier.
then i agree with your earlier post. i did not find it snarky. it was true
what you said.
dwain
On 3/12/07, Chris Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I **was** the early poster…
--
*From:* Dwain Alford
*Subject:* Re: [WSG] Simple to use page layout 'tool' ?
Gaspar wrote:
Could someone give me some links or some stuff that someone without
knowledge of ASP could help implementing some improves generate GOOD
(X)HTML
What version of .NET are you using? There is a big difference between 1.0
2.0. These following links apply to version 2.0
Many thanks to all for the suggestions, I'll check them out. Actually my
preference would probably be the pen and paper approach as well, but the
client insists that they want a *proper* tool for the job.
Thanks again folks.
Nick
Dwain Alford wrote:
then i agree with your earlier post. i
Nick Roper wrote:
Many thanks to all for the suggestions, I'll check them out. Actually my
preference would probably be the pen and paper approach as well, but the
client insists that they want a *proper* tool for the job.
In that case point 'em at iRise
NR A client wants to be able to create some draft page layouts that they
NR want achieved. Basically, they want a simple piece of software that they
NR can use to drag drop things like buttons, lists, input fields etc onto
NR a page in order to create an initial draft requirement. No
Hi Gaspar,
Looks like you guys are still using Visual Studio 2003, therefore .NET
1.1. You should consider moving up to VS 2005 and .NET 2.0 as the
standards support is much better.
Ben
On 12/03/07, Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I always work with PHP, use it to output my
I second the Axure recommendation. While it is nearly twice the cost of
Visio, it is much easier to use, far more flexible, and actually
designed for prototyping websites.
Tim
McLaughlin, Gail G wrote:
Try Axure ( http://www.axure.com/)
Hello All -
I've got a site that has a fairly MASSIVE style sheet. It's quite long as
the design spec dictates a number of different pages be layed-out
differently.
Accordingly, its becoming quite tedious to find certain style blocks that
need to be altered/tweaked as development
At my company, the business groups often use Visio to produce the
wireframes that the design groups then work toward. They also use
Powerpoint to produce light specs. I can't say I am fond of these
tools from a web development perspective, but they do allow those not
familiar with
I can assure you that wire frames for layouts are used in nearly every
design studio that I've worked in.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael MD
Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 10:28 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject:
I don't have a problem with it, in fact the site I'm working on at the
moment has 30 separate style sheets. However, remember that every style
sheet will be a separate HTTP connection to retrieve it, so no matter how
fast someone's connection is, they still have to make multiple HTTP requests
to
49 matches
Mail list logo
