[WSG] Automatisch antwoord bij afwezigheid: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Ik ben vandaag (25 april) een aanstaande vrijdag (27 april) niet aanwezig. Tijdens mijn afwezigheid kunt u voor dringende zaken contact opnemen met Alexander Kroon ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - 050 368 88 88). Met vriendelijke groet, Edwart Visser Wisdom *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] dfn and a: Which Order?
Semantically, which is better: dfna/a/dfn or adfn/dfn/a My thoughts are the latter, as the dfn is closer to the word or phrase to which it's referring. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] dfn and a: Which Order?
I agree that it should be adfntext/dfn/a since the text is actually a definition. --Michael Turnwall Mordechai Peller wrote: Semantically, which is better: dfna/a/dfn or adfn/dfn/a My thoughts are the latter, as the dfn is closer to the word or phrase to which it's referring. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] dfn and a: Which Order?
Mordechai Peller wrote: Semantically, which is better: dfna/a/dfn or adfn/dfn/a My thoughts are the latter, as the dfn is closer to the word or phrase to which it's referring. In those situations, I always try to reason it out loud to myself...the one I had quite often in a recent project was acite/cite/a vs citea/a/cite Am I linking a citation, or citing a link? In my case, it was the former. In your example: is this the defining instance of a link, or are you linking a defining instance? I'd think the latter. in your case. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ __ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] dfn and a: Which Order?
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: In those situations, I always try to reason it out loud to myself... In your example: is this the defining instance of a link, or are you linking a defining instance? I'd think the latter. in your case. My thoughts paralleled that, though your vocalization would probably have saved me some mental effort. Then again, think of all the calories those neurons must have burned; I must have lost a whole gram! No wonder I was thinner back when I used to spend all day playing chess. :) *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
You can also solve the IE problem using conditional statements in your
HTML:
See http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/cc-plus.html
For the gist
Christopher Skene
E-Business Officer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Land Water Australia
knowledge for managing Australian landscapes
Land Water Australia graphic
Level 1, 86 Northbourne Ave, Braddon ACT
GPO Box 2182, Canberra ACT 2601
phone +61 2 6263 6067
fax +61 2 6263 6099
mobile 0422 969 899
www.lwa.gov.au
This email is confidential. If received in error please delete and
advise Land Water Australia by return email.
-Original Message-
From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2007 7:42 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
From: Marian WEATHERSTONE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:43:15 +1000
Subject: Re: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org (Out of the office
until 30/04/2007)
I am currently out of the office until Monday 30 April 2007.
If you have an enquiry please contact:
Martha Herewini on 9391 9048
or Saikat Choudhury on 9391 9769
Regards, Marian Weatherstone
Web Support Officer
NSW Department of Health
__
This email has been scanned for the NSW Department of Health by the
MessageLabs Email Security System. The Department regularly monitors
emails and attachments to ensure compliance with its Electronic
Messaging Policy.
_
From: Roberts, Amanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:57:07 +1000
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: [Suspected Spam]digest for
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Wednesday 25th April is Anzac Day (a public holiday).
I'll be back in the office Thursday 26th April.
Regards,
Amanda
Amanda Roberts
Producer
Sensis Interactive
Sensis Pty Ltd
222 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000
03 8653 7898
0408 311 478
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sensis. Australia's leading information resource.
Making complex lives simpler by helping you find, buy and sell.
www.about.sensis.com.au
www.sensis.com.au
www.yellow.com.au
www.whitepages.com.au
www.citysearch.com.au
www.whereis.com.au
www.gostay.com.au
www.smallbusiness.sensis.com.au
www.justlisted.com.au
www.linkme.com.au
www.telstra.com.au
www.tradingpost.com.au
www.universalpublishers.com.au
www.invizage.com.au
Sensis cares for the environment - think before you print.
This email and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
recipient and may be confidential and/or legally privileged.
Sensis Pty Ltd disclaims liability for any errors, omissions, viruses,
loss
and/or damage arising from using, opening or transmitting this email.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, interfere with,
disclose, copy or retain this email and you should notify the sender
immediately by return email or by contacting Sensis Pty Ltd by
telephone
on [+61 3 8653 5000]
From: al morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:07:42 +1000
Subject: Re: [WSG] Disappearing positioned footer in IE7 - works in IE6
Hi,
IE 7 now supports the *html hack, so the 'position: relative' style is
bein
g
applied. You can still add hacks for IE 6 and/or IE 7 but it's tricky..
If you need to send something to IE6 and nothing else: use the
underscore
attribute hack ( border:1px solid pink;)
If you want to send something to IE7 AND IE6, use the attribute hack
(*border:1px solid black;).
If you want to send something to IE7 and NOT IE6, use a combination
(*border:1px solid black; border:1px solid pink;).
Try adding an underscore in the IE 6 class...
*html #bottom nav { /*Enables the footer to be positoned below the
wrapper in IE6*/
position: relative;
bottom: -75px;
right: 25px;
text-align: right;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
}
Al
On 4/24/07, Cole Kuryakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All -
I was having an absolutely-positioned footer problem in IE6 which was
fixed with the following:
#bottom nav {/*Compliant Browsers*/
position: absolute;
bottom: -75px;
right: 25px;
text-align: right;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
}
*html #bottom nav { /*Enables the footer to be positoned below
the
wrapper in IE6*/
position: relative;
bottom: -75px;
right: 25px;
text-align: right;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
}
Yes, well, now that IE 7 has come out the footer ***Poof!*** vanishes
-
like it did under IE6 previous to the implementation of he above *html
declaration.
Could someone give me a lead on what to do about this issue in IE 7?
Unfortunatly, I am not allowed to use conditional comments to issue
version specific declarations - which makes problems
[WSG] commenting javascript in script tags
'morning all, It is common and often recommended practice to comment javascript placed in a document. script type=text/javascript language=javascript !-- myVariable = 'woo'; // -- /script The reason cited is that 'very old browsers' that do not understand the script tag may print the raw code. How old are we talking? Has anyone ever seen this happen? Can't we safely leave behind what is essentially a hack? While I'm on the topic - what about the whole ![CDATA[ ... ]] thing? Should I be using that? What are the possible consequences of ignoring it like the vast majority of page authors? -- Andrew Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.woowoowoo.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] commenting javascript in script tags
Andrew Harris wrote: 'morning all, It is common and often recommended practice to comment javascript placed in a document. ... While I'm on the topic - what about the whole ![CDATA[ ... ]] thing? Use external scripts, and you avoid both issues quite elegantly. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ __ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] commenting javascript in script tags
On 4/26/07, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use external scripts, and you avoid both issues quite elegantly. Thanks Patrick - I should point out that this question is mostly in regards to a case where the bulk of the js is an external script. I just need to occasionally insert a variable relevant to a particular page. So, abhorrent as it might be, the script snippet has to live in the head. -- Andrew Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.woowoowoo.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
