Re: [WSG] Dutch guild of front-end developers in the making

2007-07-03 Thread Matthew Pennell

On 03/07/07, Sander Aarts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Yesterday, PPK announced that he and others are busy setting up a Dutch
guild of Front-end Developers:
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/07/gilde_van_front.html (only
in Dutch for now).

The general idea is to professionalize front-end development, emphesize
the fact that it is in fact a branche of its own and to set up a
certification system by which customers can easily distinguish between
modern developers, using web standards, and old skool table hackers.



Interesting. Whenever the subject has arisen before, it's usually been felt
that because the pace of change is so rapid in web development,
certification is practically useless - you might have qualified for a
certificate a year ago, but that's no guarantee that you're still using the
most up-to-date techniques.

--




Matthew Pennell //
m: 07904 432123 //
www.thewatchmakerproject.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Dutch guild of front-end developers in the making

2007-07-03 Thread Sander Aarts


Matthew Pennell schreef:
On 03/07/07, *Sander Aarts* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Yesterday, PPK announced that he and others are busy setting up a
Dutch guild of Front-end Developers:
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/07/gilde_van_front.html
(only in Dutch for now).

The general idea is to professionalize front-end development,
emphesize the fact that it is in fact a branche of its own and to
set up a certification system by which customers can easily
distinguish between modern developers, using web standards, and
old skool table hackers.


Interesting. Whenever the subject has arisen before, it's usually been 
felt that because the pace of change is so rapid in web development, 
certification is practically useless - you might have qualified for a 
certificate a year ago, but that's no guarantee that you're still 
using the most up-to-date techniques.


True, and that's one of the issues they're working on. There will 
probably be different certification levels and as it seems now the 
highest levels will need to be updated regularly.
The fact that the pase is so rapid makes it even harder for customers to 
know who is old skool and who is up to date.


A one year old certificate, as you mentioned, will never be very 
outdated I guess. Unless the exam was already outdated of course. Sure 
there will be new techniques or best practices, but not that many become 
standards instantly.


cheers,
Sander



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Dutch guild of front-end developers in the making

2007-07-03 Thread Lucien Stals
I just started doing a Cert IV in Assessment and Training so that I'd be a 
qualified trainer (not necessarily for the web), and I was surprised to find 
out that the training packages for  qualifications are normally only reviewed 
every 5 years. In many industries that would be okay. But on the web?

I was also surprised to find some training packages for IT related certificates 
(here in Australia ) which included a unit on writing a web documents which 
claimed DHTML was a valid markup language.

The unit (ICAB4135A) Create a simple mark up language document to 
specification says...
Mark-up language  May include but are not limited to HTML, DHTML, XHTML, SGML, 
VRML, XML. 

That unit is part of a Cert IV in IT (Websites). 

Lucien.



Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Tue, Jul 3, 2007 at  3:53 PM, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: 
 On 03/07/07, Sander Aarts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Yesterday, PPK announced that he and others are busy setting up a Dutch
 guild of Front- end Developers:
 http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/07/gilde_van_front.html (only
 in Dutch for now).

 The general idea is to professionalize front- end development, emphesize
 the fact that it is in fact a branche of its own and to set up a
 certification system by which customers can easily distinguish between
 modern developers, using web standards, and old skool table hackers.

 
 Interesting. Whenever the subject has arisen before, it's usually been felt
 that because the pace of change is so rapid in web development,
 certification is practically useless -  you might have qualified for a
 certificate a year ago, but that's no guarantee that you're still using the
 most up- to- date techniques.

Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use 
of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or protected 
by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, 
distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly prohibited. The University 
does not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are secure and there is 
also a risk that it may be corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility 
to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you 
have received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 
and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept liability in 
connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, 
unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Dutch guild of front-end developers in the making

2007-07-03 Thread James Jeffery

Interesting, although i didnt read a word of it, its all in dutch, but i got
the english summary.

As for certification, its useless as one pointed out, technologys on the
internet change all the time. Im at uni at the moment doing web development,
and in the HTML side of things, they still teach old school methods. Lukily
for me i know alot on the web standards side of things.

Fair play to them though, thumbs up, wish them well.

On 7/3/07, Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I just started doing a Cert IV in Assessment and Training so that I'd be a
qualified trainer (not necessarily for the web), and I was surprised to find
out that the training packages for  qualifications are normally only
reviewed every 5 years. In many industries that would be okay. But on the
web?

I was also surprised to find some training packages for IT related
certificates (here in Australia ) which included a unit on writing a web
documents which claimed DHTML was a valid markup language.

The unit (ICAB4135A) Create a simple mark up language document to
specification says...
Mark-up language  May include but are not limited to HTML, DHTML, XHTML,
SGML, VRML, XML. 

That unit is part of a Cert IV in IT (Websites).

Lucien.



Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Tue, Jul 3, 2007 at  3:53 PM, Matthew Pennell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 On 03/07/07, Sander Aarts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Yesterday, PPK announced that he and others are busy setting up a
Dutch
 guild of Front- end Developers:
 http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/07/gilde_van_front.html(only
 in Dutch for now).

 The general idea is to professionalize front- end development,
emphesize
 the fact that it is in fact a branche of its own and to set up a
 certification system by which customers can easily distinguish between
 modern developers, using web standards, and old skool table hackers.


 Interesting. Whenever the subject has arisen before, it's usually been
felt
 that because the pace of change is so rapid in web development,
 certification is practically useless -  you might have qualified for a
 certificate a year ago, but that's no guarantee that you're still using
the
 most up- to- date techniques.

Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the
use of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or
protected by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly
prohibited. The University does not warrant that this e-mail and any
attachments are secure and there is also a risk that it may be corrupted in
transmission. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses
or defects before opening them. If you have received this transmission in
error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 and delete it immediately from
your system. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Dutch guild of front-end developers in the making

2007-07-03 Thread Rob Crowther
James Jeffery wrote:
 Interesting, although i didnt read a word of it, its all in dutch, but i
 got the english summary.
 
I tried translating it with Babelfish, the result was somewhat
incoherent but more intelligible (to me) than Dutch.

 As for certification, its useless as one pointed out,

They're not useless, though their main benefit is demonstrating a level
of technical competency to non-technical people - eg. managers, HR
departments and recruiters, rather than as a direct benefit to the
certificate holder.

 technologys on the internet change all the time.

This is simply not true, HTML 4.01 was published in December 1999.  CSS
2.0 was published in May 1998, neither of these are obsolete.  Even in
terms of practical implementations, IE6 was launched in 2001 and not
superseded until late last year.  What changes more frequently is the
more nebulous concept of 'best practice' rather than the standards
themselves, and those, I think, change more gradually over time rather
than the epochal pattern of browser/standards release cycles.

Even if a certificate were only valid for one year it would still have
some long term value - someone with a two year old certification ought
to have more value in a potential employer's eyes than someone who's
never gained any certification at all.

Perhaps the certification process itself should include some portion of
'keeping up' - ie. reading mailing lists and blogs, attending
conferences etc. - similar to professional development programmes that
already exist in management and other parts of IT?

Rob


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Robot meta tags

2007-07-03 Thread Joyce Evans
I'm new to this group, so if this discussion has occurred in the past, I'm
not aware of it.

 

Is it important to include the following as part of the meta tags on web
pages?

 

meta name=robots content=index,follow

 

Joyce



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Robot meta tags

2007-07-03 Thread Lea de Groot
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:45:26 -0500, Joyce Evans wrote:
 Is it important to include the following as part of the meta tags on 
 web pages?
  
 meta name=robots content=index,follow

No.
'index' and 'follow' are the default values for the robots meta - any 
robot will assume these values if there is no robots meta element on 
the page.
You only need to include them if you are resetting them to eg 'noindex' 
or 'nofollow', etc.

Of course, it isn't *wrong* to include them, just redundant.

warmly,
Lea
-- 
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems
Brisbane, Australia


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Footer Problem IE5.x

2007-07-03 Thread Joyce Evans
Regarding Why beat your head against the wall of buggy browsers when the 
manufacturer themselves supplies a workaround?

I want to know more about conditional comments.  Is this a good resource?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512.aspx#Conditional_Statement
s


Joyce

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Gleitzman
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 3:28 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Footer Problem IE5.x


On 2 Jul 2007, at 6:09 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:

 I guess I was hoping to fix the problem(s), rather than just rely on a
 hack. Other suggestions appreciated.

Fair enough, but I'd say your chances of getting the one set of css 
rules to display correctly in all browsers are pretty slim - especially 
if you want to include browsers as flawed as Exploder 5.x. Even MS 
themselves accept how hard this is - hence CCs.

I routinely serve as many as three alternative stylesheets vis CCs for 
different versions of IE. They only need to contain a handful of rules 
necessary to override the correct values served to compliant browsers.

Whether you consider CCs a hack is, I guess, subjective. But your code 
will validate, and they're easy to remove with a global search and 
replace if and when the time comes that you don't need them any more.

Why beat your head against the wall of buggy browsers when the 
manufacturer themselves supplies a workaround?

N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Images not showing on the MAC (JavaScript issue)

2007-07-03 Thread Taco Fleur
Hi all,

I hope its not off-topic, it is after all to do with user friendliness.

I'm using some JavaScript to hide any images that have not loaded properly
or are missing. I don't like seeing the red crosses on a site, it looks
unprofessional.

http://www.sellmystuff.com.au/buystuff/generalstuff/parent-category.cfm?cate
goryIdentity=1

The problem is that on the MAC it removes all images like they have not
loaded properly. It only removes the ones within the HTML, not those placed
by CSS.

Following is the code used to check, obviously isLoadedImage always seems to
return false on the MAC for some reason. Would anyone know why?

function isLoadedImage( obj ) {
 if (!obj.complete) {
  return false;
 }
 if ( typeof obj.naturalWidth != undefined  obj.naturalWidth == 0 ) {
  return false;
 }

return true;
}

function checkImage() {
 for ( var i = 0; i  document.images.length; i++ ) {
  if ( !isLoadedImage( document.images[ i ] ) ) {
   document.images[ i ].style.visibility = hidden;
  }
 }
};
myWindow.doAddOnloadListener( checkImage );

Thanks in advance.

Kind regards, Taco Fleur




clickfindT
www.clickfind.com.au the new Australian search engine for businesses,
products and services . 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Robot meta tags

2007-07-03 Thread Bruce Morrison
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 19:04 -0400, Brian Cummiskey wrote:
 Joyce Evans wrote:
 
  Is it important to include the following as part of the meta tags on 
  web pages?
 
  meta name=robots content=index,follow
 
 No.   Meta tags are all but depreciated at this point.  he only common 
 one still being used is the langauge/charset type.

Most possibly getting off topic but meta name=description content
=meta description here /  WILL be used by google for the description
under the title in search results.

Cheers
Bruce

-- 
Bruce Morrison
Solution Architect

designIT Pty Ltd
Website Content Management Specialists



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Dutch guild of front-end developers in the making

2007-07-03 Thread Sander Aarts


James Jeffery schreef:
As for certification, its useless as one pointed out, technologys on 
the internet change all the time.

Lukily for me i know alot on the web standards side of things.


Well, that knowledge is useless too then as web technology changes all 
the time.


Even though things change more rapidly in web development than in other 
technology branches, that doesn't necessarily mean that certification is 
useless. As Rob Crowther already pointed out web *standards* don't 
really change that often. And even best practices evolve in such a pase 
(certainly not every month) that, for front-end development, a 
certificate with a validity of 1 or 2 years (depending on the level) can 
give quite an accurate indication of the developer's skills.


Besides that, I want to know where I stand and what areas I need to 
improve that perhaps I'm not aware of.


cheers,
Sander



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Developing Accessible Applications With Flash, Asp and visual Basic

2007-07-03 Thread Marvin Hunkin
Hi.
now just wondering, can i develop flash web applications, using jaws, and 
say using a programming interface say like microsoft visual studio, asp, or 
the flash development kit, and like say developing web applications, with a 
flash interface, and say doing animations, lines, arrows, buttons, and a 
flash movie, inserting, audio and video.
how accessible with jaws?
if you could let me, know, send asap.
cheers Marvin. 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Re: video

2007-07-03 Thread Paul Bennett
Flash: (google video, youtube, yahoo video, revver, dailymotion, etc etc)
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_1/
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_2/
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_3/ 

Yes, you can get (pretty) good quality flash video at a low file size

Quicktime gives good quality (at a larger file size) but just isn't as 
ubiquitous as flash...

My 2c anyway


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Re: video

2007-07-03 Thread Karl Lurman

Flash all the way im afraid.
2c
Karl

On 7/4/07, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Flash: (google video, youtube, yahoo video, revver, dailymotion, etc etc)
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_1/
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_2/
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_3/

Yes, you can get (pretty) good quality flash video at a low file size

Quicktime gives good quality (at a larger file size) but just isn't as 
ubiquitous as flash...

My 2c anyway


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Re: video

2007-07-03 Thread Marghanita da Cruz

Karl Lurman wrote:

Flash all the way im afraid.
2c
Karl

On 7/4/07, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Flash: (google video, youtube, yahoo video, revver, dailymotion, etc etc)
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_1/
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_2/
http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_rise_of_flash_video_part_3/

Yes, you can get (pretty) good quality flash video at a low file size

Quicktime gives good quality (at a larger file size) but just isn't as 
ubiquitous as flash...


My 2c anyway

snip
You could also look at OGG/Theora and MPEG4...
see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora

and there are some filesize comparisons at
http://www.ramin.com.au/linux/acs-os-sig.html#slide6

Marghanita
--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://www.ramin.com.au/linux
Phone: 0414 869202


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Footer Problem IE5.x

2007-07-03 Thread Thierry Koblentz
 On Behalf Of Joyce Evans
 I want to know more about conditional comments.  Is this a good
 resource?
 http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-
 us/library/ms537512.aspx#Conditional_Statement

Yes it is. You can also check this article I wrote: 
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/conditional_comments.asp

HTH,
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***