Hi Julie
- Original Message -
From: Julie Romanowski
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: [WSG] skip links
Screen magnification users also benefit from skip links. Making these
links visible help more than just screen reader and
I'm a bit late but here are some good 'skip link' links:
http://joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/Chapter08.html
http://www.webaim.org/techniques/skipnav/
http://juicystudio.com/article/skip-links.php
***
List
On 29 Oct 2009, at 11:48, designer wrote:
Screen magnification users also benefit from skip links. Making
these links visible help more than just screen reader and keyboard
users.
div class=skip
a href=#content accesskey=SSkip to Main Content/a
/div
Presumably, the accesskey caters for
Hi - I'll be on leave and will return to the office Monday 2nd November.
In that time Vikki Hsieh can help you with any matters relating to USiT.
Cheers
Chris Khalil,
Director of User Experience, USiT
ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote:
Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility,
but it's not completed.
I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers
but:
* Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't
define it)
* Users may define
David Hucklesby さんは書きました:
ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote:
Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the
accessibility, but it's not completed.
I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen
readers but:
* Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't
Yes, I know it's off topic, but I really need a hand with a mystifying
problem. I've tried the google forums, but have received no replies.
If there are any listers who understand the free Google Custom Search
Engine, webmaster tools, sitemaps and indexing problems, then I'd
really appreciate you
Craig,
OK - that's a really interesting comment.
I had, as far as I knew, used the right formatting, the sitemap validates as
XML and Google's webmaster tools accepted it as a valid feed (after a few
tweaks!)
I followed this document, which I understand is the definitive source.
Bother! that last reply was supposed to be off list!
Oh well, the discussion had got around to web standards by that point,
so it's fair game.
...and it's a friday afternoon, cut me some slack!!
Thanks to all those who have replied off list. By way of reporting
back to the list, I'll say...
1)
