RE: [ADMIN} spam alert - Thread Closed Re: [WSG] RE:

2010-08-12 Thread Nixon David
I don't think anyone wants to see your tactical nukes Lea :-) -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Lea de Groot Sent: 12 August 2010 10:24 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [ADMIN} spam alert - Thread Closed

Re: [ADMIN} spam alert - Thread Closed Re: [WSG] RE:

2010-08-12 Thread tee
Hi Lea, The message of that spam is very familiar. I received similar messages from friends and a number of people I know in the past few months. It was very uncharacteristic to receive this sort of email from friends so I emailed them and learned that their gmail accounts got hacked and they

Re: [ADMIN} spam alert - Thread Closed Re: [WSG] RE:

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Grant
Maybe the guy genuinely won a Mac from that site and couldn't resist but share the news with the rest of the world?! :-D We will never know. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, tee weblis...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Lea, The message of that spam is very familiar. I received similar messages from

Re: [ADMIN} spam alert - Thread Closed Re: [WSG] RE:

2010-08-12 Thread Russ Weakley
What part of thread closed do people not understand? Lea, I say we take off and nuke the entire list from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. Russ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Re: [WSG] HTML5 offline storage question

2010-08-12 Thread Rob Crowther
Ryan Seddon wrote: If you make an update to the manifest file it will re-download every asset listed in the manifest. You can split resources across multiple manifest files, though, as far as I can tell, the you only get one manifest per page. Have you ever tried caching pages which

[WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread Tom Livingston
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site? http://html5boilerplate.com/ Looks pretty good to me... what say ye? -- Tom Livingston | Senior Interactive Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com

RE: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread Dan Freeman
Considering the link doesn't even look right in IE8, I'm not sure I'd use it to build anything. Dan Freeman Webmaster ERP Administrator 800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE) 330.655.0341 (DIRECT) www.lexi.com -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]

Re: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread Sam Sherlock
Dan I would look past per-site design choices such as that. and look into the neat and beneficial features which are many and various (also the example in use there is outdated compared with the code on github) the site has the initial release of html5boilerplate where as the github repo is

Re: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread Hugo Mendes
I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but an HTML5 Professional Template with BROWSER DETECTION (those conditional comments in the markup) is not a best practice. - HM On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Sam Sherlock sam.sherl...@gmail.com wrote: Dan I would look past per-site design choices such as

Re: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread Tom Livingston
I rather liked the conditionals around the body. What's not to like? On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Hugo Mendes hugo.men...@gmail.com wrote: I'm sorry to disappoint you guys, but an HTML5 Professional Template with BROWSER DETECTION (those conditional comments in the markup) is not a best

Re: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread David Hucklesby
On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site? http://html5boilerplate.com/ Looks pretty good to me... what say ye? Some useful ideas there, although I won't be using it as-is. Thanks for sharing. Cordially, David --

Re: [WSG] Paul Irish/Divya Manian HTML5 Boilerplate

2010-08-12 Thread Tom Livingston
Like the site says, it's delete-key friendly :-) On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site? http://html5boilerplate.com/ Looks pretty good to

[WSG] Getting my feet wet in HTML5

2010-08-12 Thread Tom Livingston
List, Here's a theory question ( i think) for ya. I'm working on a layout, and am attempting to use section and aside. Properly, I believe. But as I look at my layout, I'm thinking ok, i'll put an ID on this section, and one on that section... and I stopped and thought Uh oh... it's the same as

Re: [WSG] Getting my feet wet in HTML5

2010-08-12 Thread Chris Knowles
Tom, I think the answer to that is semantics - div has no meaning. Id's are there for you to manipulate the look and behaviour, the tags themselves offer a way for third parties to glean meaning from the page. e.g you could build an overview of a page by grabbing the first bit of text inside

Re: [WSG] HTML5 offline storage question

2010-08-12 Thread Ryan Seddon
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Rob Crowther robe...@boogdesign.com wrote: You can split resources across multiple manifest files, though, as far as I can tell, the you only get one manifest per page. Yeah that is a good point. Although doing so would require the person to visit each page