Hey all
Came across this today.. mainstream business site presented by CSS.
http://www.netspace.net.au/
Gripe : 800x600 res is a bit "full".
Note the comments :
Cheers
James
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Dave Shea redesigned Fog Creek Software's site.
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/11/03/fog_creek_so/
Validation nutters beware!
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/6519.htm
Haven't read it yet, but should be interesting. The beauty of WMW is that
there are people from a very diverse range of backgrounds, from hardcore
spammers and "search engine optimisers" to standards geeks and techs.
Cheers
Mark
__
Ma
The competition is over, and all entires are online:
http://builtforthefuture.com/reuseit/contestants.php
Russ
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
Well to me those css errors just look like the kind of last minute thing
that we all know can easily sneak through
As for the html... well some of that stuff will make it easier for legacy
browsers to understand and not feck up the site. But if this was the reason
for their inclusion it rather beg
37 Signals just launched the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) site:
http://www.sra.org/
Very nice, simple, elegant design. Three interesting points
1. Uses a basic table grid and then mostly CSS for style - not that this is
a bad thing, but slightly surprising.
2. invalid xhtml - they have gone f
The next Sydney meeting (and end of year party) will be Thursday 4 December,
2003.
John Allsopp will be guest presenter for the evening and will be talking
about the history of CSS, where it is now, and where it will be going in the
future.
For those of you who do not know about John Allsopp, he
