Brian:
Doesn't seem an easy task (I'm not a css master anyway), but I think you
could use combinations of several selectors to accomplish what you want (not
nesting it though).
Using descendent, child, adjacent and universal selectors,
(check http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/descend
Andy Budd wrote:
Sorry for the rather random and off topic post, but I wonder if anybody
here knows what the web design scene is like in Christchurch, NZ?
Are there any particularly well known web design firms for there,
especially those working in the web standards arena?
Andy Budd
There is a
I've never seen such 'nesting' listed anywhere in any CSS how-to info,
and I presume that (a) if it were possible, the technique would have
been published, and (b) it hasn't been published because it doesn't
work. Having said that, I haven't ever tested it, so I don't know for
sure...
What you
Is there a syntax in CSS declarations which 'wraps' classes/ids in a
parent condition? I'm not asking this very clearly, but the idea is
similar to the Javascript syntax...
with {
...
}
The purpose being, I find myself writing a lot of statements like the below
#navigation p {...}
#navigation
On Saturday, Oct 2, 2004, at 19:32 Australia/Sydney, russ - maxdesign
wrote:
That does not take into account headings of different character
length. From
what I understand, the underline must be under the content only, no
matter
how long the content is.
Oh, OK - the bg image is being tiled, rig
While the wordpress blogging package does an admirable job publishing
valid XHTML/CSS with good semantic code there is one feature which fails
accessibility guidlelines.
read more about Make Wordpress ‘More’ Links Accessible :
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/2004/10/02/make-wordpress-more-links-acce
thanks James you have confirmed my suspicion that "by default
elements are 100% wide"
everyone else, thanks for the suggestions. I only had it set on "inline"
for a few minutes anyway as i knew it was not the best method, and I
know that "As soon as you convert something to inline you allow ot
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:16:43 +1000, Neerav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im experimenting with some techniques from dan cederholms book "Web
> Standards Solutions" and found that setting a background image like so
>
> h1 , h2 , h3 , h4 , h5
> {
>text-align : left;
>padding-bottom: 14px;
>
> Neerav, in any case... What if you leave the Hx as block elements, but
> use no-repeat instead? I think it's your repeat-x that's causing the
> problem...
That does not take into account headings of different character length. From
what I understand, the underline must be under the content only,
Uh - no... the point is that the markup doesn't change *regardless* of
what you do with it the css. Separation of content and presentation -
right? That's how come we can use ul's for horiz navbars, vertical
buttons, or whatever.
Neerav, in any case... What if you leave the Hx as block elements
> Are there any caveats to bear in mind when forcing Hx tags to be "inline" ?
Yes, but not from a structural point of view, from a visual point of view.
As soon as you convert something to inline you allow other inline elements
to run up beside it - depending on the available space in the parent
c
Now I'm thorougly confused, because that one works! I cleared cache,
etc, but the same code isn't working on my server.
*shakes head in dismay*
Well, eary this morning I was able to look up some code online, did some
comparisons, and was able to fix it (fix so I can see it!).
Thanks for your h
Hi, first time poster... anyway.
I think most would agree that forcing Hx elements to become inline
elements, rather than block level elements, is a poor use of the
markup. In other words, semantically it's probably not the best idea.
Technically you could take an unordered list and style it so
13 matches
Mail list logo
