Hi Shane,
It's and IE problem. Looks great on Firefox.
(I don't have linux :( Firefox 0.10.1)
--
Gmail invites - just ask nicely
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:45:50 +1000, Joshua Street
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Be nice to PC's. I've got a PC, and all that looks fine to me.
>
> Mind you, I'm r
Be nice to PC's. I've got a PC, and all that looks fine to me.
Mind you, I'm running Linux... ;)
(Firefox 0.10.1, SuSE 9.1)
Josh
p.s. I do get a JavaScript error, though.
Error: window.attachEvent is not a function
Source File: http://sonze.com/lange/includes/scripts.js
Line: 73
On Sat, 2004
I was having a great week in my Mac world of coding my newest client's
website in CSS & XHTML. All was well in my happy little MacLife. The
site was working just fine in Mac Safari, Firefox, Netscape, & IE
5.2.3. Then I got curious as to what was going on in the PC world. So
I went to a fri
I think I understand...
You want to make the semi-transparent div cover the entire window, and
to remain covering the window on window.onresize.
Moz will do this for you using CSS only, provided it is not contained in
another element with positioning, or the containing element is :
/* css file
in my opinion this is still rather sketchy, i am yet to see some
examples where people are using this technique in the realworld. yes
there are a lot of 'how to' on the w3c site but i am more interested
in the realistic examples. But anyway thanks for your replies guys. It
would be good to see if a
Option 3 for me, on the grounds that yes, it's a list, but that the
order of the list items is important (as it effectively denotes a
step-by-step path from the site's home page to the current page, and
these steps need to be taken in that particular order). It's this
hierarchy inherent in the orde
> Option 4 is... interesting. There is something subtlely wrong with it,
> but I can't quite put my finger on it. Perhaps it just seems overkill?
I think at this stage i'm an option 4 convertee... unless you can
convince me otherwise!
It just seems the most semantically correct... turn off styles
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:43:08 +1000, Gavin Cooney wrote:
> So what do you think? How do you do your breadcrumbs?
Option 1 - ul list.
Simple to do and applies some semantics to it, without using too much
bandwidth or work.
Option 2 (nested ul) and 3 (ol) actually have stronger arguments for
them,
In most legal documents the number is very important and is referenced
in dozens of places, other documents etc.
For this reason I'm not sure if s even with css 3 support are that
suitable beyond the inital creation of the document.
I'd just use a 1 main section
and 1.1 not so main section
and 1.
Hi all,
Apologies if this has been asked on WSG before, but I was wondering
the general opinion on the most correct semantic way of coding
breadcrumb trails.
There's many webpages dealing with this:
http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2004/02/23/sqxii_conclusion.html
http://www.google.com/search?
hi Natalie,
just delete the height rule from the .floatleft div. that way the
divs will expand to contain the text.
in fact, Mozilla and Firefox are behaving exactly as the standards say
they should - it's IE that is getting it wrong by expanding the div
beyond your stated height.
On Fri, 15 O
scrap that - it now works as expected.
Thanks for pointing out the height!
It doesn't work in my real-world code (not uploaded) though - must be
some other element in the actual page causing the issue.
Thanks again.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:07:36 +1000, Natalie Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I've removed the height (oops thought I already had!) and re-uploaded the file.
The problem still exists :(
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:54:58 +0800, Tania Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a height set on the .floatleft class of 240px on the page you
> listed in your msg.
>
> Tania
>
> -
13 matches
Mail list logo