On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:32, Chris Blown wrote:
>
> I can tab fine through that page. Using FF v1.0.4 under Linux.
>
Correction.. I can't tab through this. :|
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/archives/flash_satay_firefox_bug/
Doh!
**
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:38, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>
> Check out the example page in firefox.
>
> http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/76/
I can tab fine through that page. Using FF v1.0.4 under Linux.
**
The discussion list for http
A small heads-up to alert those (myself included) using the flash satay
method http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/ of an annoying
variation of an old bug in firefox:
"The flash satay method has become a widely used technique for embedding
flash into valid XHTML documents. However, e
sports fans,
if you had part of a form that had a checkbox that when checked
enabled a file upload input, how would you mark that up?
the result should look something like this:
http://skunkworks.farcrycms.com/wsg/label/label.gif
but i wasnt sure what the label tag/s would/should wrap around...
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Geoff Deering wrote:
The first is correct, but should only be used when
referencing the author of a document.
Arguably, though, if these are the contact details of the company
whose site you're on, then it *is* correct (as they would, in the
wider sense, be the au
Lea de Groot wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005 06:48:55 +1000, Geoff Deering wrote:
The first is correct, but should only be used when
referencing the author of a document.
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/address.html
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html-spec_5.html#SEC5.5.3
It's not used for
Geoff Deering wrote:
The first is correct, but should only be used when referencing
the author of a document.
Arguably, though, if these are the contact details of the company whose
site you're on, then it *is* correct (as they would, in the wider sense,
be the authors of their site - and n
Lea - I think the problematic part of the element as
described in Geoff's link is the part reading "authorship for the
current document". Yes, wrapping a street address is correct. However,
it specifies that the address must be related directly to the document
(e.g. the author's or owner organisat
On Mon, 23 May 2005 06:48:55 +1000, Geoff Deering wrote:
> The first is correct, but should only be used when
> referencing the author of a document.
>
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/address.html
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html-spec_5.html#SEC5.5.3
>
> It's not used for general cont
Bruce Gilbert wrote:
for an address, which way is best
1st line
2nd line
3rd line
or
1st line
2nd line
3rd line
TIA!
The first is correct, but should only be used when referencing
the author of a document.
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html3/address.html
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-
I would go for the first one, since in this I think the is
given semantic value as a separator (even though, technically the
element has zero semantic value). The first set of markup would by
default display a nice, multi-line formatted address in all browsers
and could be formatted into a comma-s
On 22 May 2005 at 15:57, Bruce Gilbert wrote:
> for an address, which way is best
>
>
> 1st line
> 2nd line
> 3rd line
>
>
> or
>
>
> 1st line
> 2nd line
> 3rd line
>
Hello Bruce,
I do actually not know the DTD, but the second version declares three
adresses. So the first version should
for an address, which way is best
1st line
2nd line
3rd line
or
1st line
2nd line
3rd line
TIA!
--
::Bruce::
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints o
Hi Mike, this is such a creative and entertaining way to introduce web
standards. Kudos!
Will the site be permanent? I have bookmarked it and hope to show to
potential clients when explanation of web standards is needed and let them
understand web standards is important for their sites.
tee
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
