Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
I'm using the standalone MSIE 5.01 and 5.5 from www.quirksmode.org to
tweak a design for IE5 and 5.5.
Is it just me or don't these versions pick up conditional comments for
various older IE versions?
No, only the latest...
Have a read:
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/live5/
Seems to be working now... but
still falls apart in Safari 1 on OS X
Any comments on how to improve this would be greatly (and gratefully) received
Adam
**
The discussion list for
Thanks!
Just wanted to make sure the comments WILL be picked up by real 5.0
or 5.5 users.
I can fake things for testing and I got everything rendering the way
I wanted so I guess I'm fine.
Cheers,
Marco
On Nov 19, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
Ok, I have a test page up. It is using the basic structure of the site I
am making.
I am using Firefox 1.0.7.
www.re-entity.com/FF_Flicker_Bug.htm
Regards,
Stuart
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
its not to do with a bold font taking up more space and shifting
other elements?
also are you certain
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
I'm using the standalone MSIE 5.01 and 5.5 from www.quirksmode.org to
tweak a design for IE5 and 5.5.
Is it just me or don't these versions pick up conditional comments
for various older IE versions?
here is the fix, if you or
Ok, it seems SPAM but is ON TOPIC, IMHO.
So, why don't you simply ignore it or delete it?
Why do you need to complain? IMHO yours and therefor mine too, messages are
OFF TOPIC right now.
So, sorry for all the users but I needed to say this to Mark.
On 16/11/05 8:50, Mark Harris [EMAIL
Absolutely, way off and it started over 2 weeks ago. Stop now!
P
IMHO yours and therefor mine
too, messages are
OFF TOPIC right now.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Yes, removing that line with overflow:auto; removes the flicker, but it
also breaks the design.
From the perspective of the current project, I'd rather loose the
font-weight:bold. If I can keep both then the client will be happy.
Nick Cowie wrote:
It is overflow: auto; in
.clear .module_bg
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
www.re-entity.com/FF_Flicker_Bug.htm
Setting 'overflow: hidden;' on the outer wrapper - #thePage - makes the
flickering stop in Moz 1.7.12.
Makes sense in a way, in that all such flickering in older Moz/FF
usually stops when the page is isolated[1] from the
On 19 Nov 2005, at 1:07 AM, Bert Doorn wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
It is difficult to give a link layout, but 'zoom: 100%' will work.
Question: Which CSS standard defines the zoom property?
you suspicions are correct Bert, but then hasLayout, which accounts for
a lot of gotchas in
Terrence Wood wrote:
On 19 Nov 2005, at 1:07 AM, Bert Doorn wrote:
Question: Which CSS standard defines the zoom property?
The MSDN standard[1]... :-)
you suspicions are correct Bert, but then hasLayout, which accounts
for a lot of gotchas in stanards design, isn't a standard property
That's great Gunlaug.
Is this a bug worth reporting or is it something that is already known?
I have only seen variations of bugs with overflow set but none with the
flickering.
Your thoughts?
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
www.re-entity.com/FF_Flicker_Bug.htm
Setting
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Is this a bug worth reporting or is it something that is already
known? I have only seen variations of bugs with overflow set but none
with the flickering.
Such flickering doesn't appear to be a problem in any case I've tested
in the latest FF-versions, so I guess that
13 matches
Mail list logo
