Please note that we have closed down for our Summer Break from 14 December 2007
till 2 January 2008. Limited access to e-mail.
If you urgently need to contact me, then please use the online contact form on
http://www.asq.co.za/contact.aspx.
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hi,
On the below 3 column page
http://www.jfl.ie/index.php
Does that look allright?
-best
kvnmcwebn
Yes, I suppose so.
But there seldom is a correlation between how well a page /looks/ on the
Web and how well that page /works/ on the Web (with user discretion
Michael Horowitz wrote:
It would be a wonderful world.
I can't imagine how government does anything but lower standards in
these areas.
Assuming you're being serious, I would love to hear your reasoning for
this. With most things even remotely technical now happily existing in
a market
At http://theatomicconservative.typepad.com/ when I click on any of my
links the text at Subscribe to this blog's feed turns red (which is the
color is should change to when clicked.
Here is what I believe is the relevant CSS
.module a:link { color: #1e77f5 }
.module a:visited { color:
Michael Horowitz wrote:
At http://theatomicconservative.typepad.com/ when I click on any of my
links the text at Subscribe to this blog's feed turns red (which is
the color is should change to when clicked.
Hi Michael,
It's not doing it here - FF 2.0.0.11 or IE 6.0.
Andrew
Interesting as Andrew pointed out the issue does not occur is IE 6. I
have it only occur in IE 7 which would make it a new IE bug. The
frustrating part of typepad is I cannot delete the original css
declaration only overwrite it with the new one.
I'm also new to learning firebug, how does
Michael Horowitz wrote:
Interesting as Andrew pointed out the issue does not occur is IE 6. I
have it only occur in IE 7 which would make it a new IE bug. The
frustrating part of typepad is I cannot delete the original css
declaration only overwrite it with the new one.
I'm also new to
Do you forcibly work for the government or do you offer your services in
the free market? Does your company hire the worst developers and
designers or the best it can afford at the salary it is willing to pay.
In the free market their tends to be high and low quality products based
on the
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here is how I added the CSS for that
The image is definitely
therehttp://theatomicconservative.typepad.com/images/atom.gif
/*define look of buttons*/
ul a{
display:block;
width: 98%;
Michael Horowitz wrote:
In the free market their tends to be high and low quality products based
on the price the buyer wishes to pay. You can buy a Lexus or you can by
Kia. All transactions are between a willing buyer and seller.
Only until you get to a situation of oligopoly or monopoly.
56 Flash tutorials
http://www.blogcreativo.com.ar/56-tutoriales-de-flash/
65 Illustrator tutorials
http://www.blogcreativo.com.ar/65-tutoriales-de-illustrator/
800 Photoshop Brushes
http://www.blogcreativo.com.ar/mas-de-800-brushes-para-photoshop/
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here is how I added the CSS for
that
The image is definitely
where in the folder structure is the css file?
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here
try url(../images/atom.gif)
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server that I want to show up
on my buttons but it isn't appearing. Here is how I added the
On Dec 16, 2007 9:54 PM, Adam Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where in the folder structure is the css file?
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 9:21 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to my issues I put a image on the server
Look how Firefox has grown to 16% of the market. I think that shows how
you are not correct. I also suspect that Open Office is going to start
challenging Microsoft as well. Especially is MSFT succeeds with
establishing good copy protection
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
That was a stupid mistake but when corrected I still have the issue. I
also should at least have had the hover working when I make that mistake
and it didn't show either
/*define look of buttons*/
ul a{
display:block;
width: 98%;
line-height:1.4em;
background:#1c1c1b url(images/atom.gif)
Solved it I had to use /images not images
Strange that it is so specific.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Adam Martin wrote:
try url(../images/atom.gif)
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, krugonN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I said you need to change to
background:#1c1c1b url(../images/atom.gif) no-repeat left bottom;
note the ../
On Dec 17, 2007 11:31 AM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was a stupid mistake but when corrected I still have the issue. I
also should at least have had the hover
On Dec 16, 2007 7:06 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does your company hire the worst developers and
designers or the best it can afford at the salary it is willing to pay.
I just finished working for a company that would hire the worst
developers and designers. I think it was
On Dec 16, 2007 8:27 PM, Michael Horowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look how Firefox has grown to 16% of the market. I think that shows how
you are not correct. I also suspect that Open Office is going to start
challenging Microsoft as well. Especially is MSFT succeeds with
establishing good
Michael Horowitz wrote:
Look how Firefox has grown to 16% of the market. I think that shows how
you are not correct.
Aeh..you ARE aware of the various antitrust actions the government took
to prevent MSFT from becoming an actual monopoly, don't you? Without
government action in the past,
Again this isn't about supporting one company over another. It's about
using the coercive power of government to control someone elses private
property (which is what a business is)
I don't like a lot of how MSFT does things. But they don't control the
world. Frontpage died while
And see what happens to the company in the market.
6 months ago I was let go because my boss thought I was a threat to his
job. The company continues a spiral towards bankruptcy. They are the
oldest company in their business and their chief competitor beats them
every time they go head to
It isn't the overwritten style. I verified that by changing the visited
link to green
.module a:link { color: #1e77f5; }
/*.module a:visited { color: #d22539; }*/
.module a:visited { color: green; }
.module a:hover { color: #1e77f5; }
.module a:active { color: #1e77f5; }
and now it changes to
Michael Horowitz wrote:
And see what happens to the company in the market.
The damage has already been done however. What happens when rather then
it being a piece of software thats faulty, its a car. or a child's toy,
or an aeroplane. Sure, eventually the company would get its just
deserts,
Now that I have mastered putting an image in a site using CSS do we just
throw out the img tag in standards based xhtml. And how does the use of
css compare with use of the object tag
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/jun2004/ I found in my
google searches on the issue.
--
Guys,
While the thread is interesting, do try to keep it on the topic of *web
standards*.
Some of the points which are either off topic or verging there include:
- is Microsoft the boogey man?
- should the government implement standards.
The thread is still open, and it will stay that way if
I assume you mean you are setting a background image using css - now what if
you want another image on top - you use img tag for that.
For example have a look at http://qps.shockmedia.com.au/About-QPS - if you
resize the browser window you will see that the logo appears on top of the
image on the
Personally, I think the img tag has the correct semantics (and attributes) for
an image. I'd just keep them for images in paragraphs and use css background
for everything else.
An object is just that!
-Original Message-
From: Michael Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December
Michael Horowitz wrote:
Now that I have mastered putting an image in a site using CSS do we
just throw out the img tag in standards based xhtml. And how does the
use of css compare with use of the object tag
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/jun2004/ I found in
my google
31 matches
Mail list logo
