There is no need to style the forms strongly but you can try to
explicitly coax the style to be more uniform by applying CSS
intelligently.
BTW: Buttons should be buttons and not an obscure graphic acting as a
link or calling JavaScript.
If you keep your head on your shoulders there should
He all!
I have been searching the net for rumors and facts about E4X
implementations. This is what I've found:
Mozilla (Spidermonkey and Rhino) support E4X today - and has been doing
it for a while!
Adobe does too.
So does (already/soon?) MbedThis. At least they are 100% committed.
Hi All.
Im not familiar with test plans for Websites, i have my own way of running
tests that usually run of what the client wants i.e: Is the header 320px
heigh? and does it expand when the font size is incremented?.
I have to do an in depth test plan for an assignment, which i would also use
In short, if it isn't available in IE7, then not for at least a year at
the very least, but more likely about 3+ years.
I wouldn't try to right any critical applications with it any time soon.
Keryx Web wrote:
He all!
I have been searching the net for rumors and facts about E4X
Keryx Web skrev:
He all!
Should have been Hi all!
Answering (partially) my own question.
Webkit:
The E4X standard adds some XML-related features to the
JavaScript language. We should consider adding these to the
JavaScriptCore engine.
I found the tracking bug as well:
When you talk about 'standard' or 'government' test plans, what you mean is
documentation as per IEE 829. Unfortunately this is an appallingly bad
standard that guarantees inefficient and ineffective testing. However, this
is what most test consultants peddle because it's easy to teach and some
I'd love to see the stuff online. I think this is a very important part
of web standards. QA should not be an afterthought but an integral part
of the process.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Steve Green wrote:
When you talk about
On 2008/01/15 12:05 (GMT+1000) Tate Johnson apparently typed:
From my experience, Konqueror and Safari render pages identically. In
addition, now that Safari is available on Windows
...
there is virtually no difference between browsers that
are available on Windows, OS X and Linux.
I've just sent James a heap of sample test plans and stuff, but
unfortunately very little of it is online because it's mostly stuff I've
collected over the years in case it was ever useful (it wasn't).
If you want to learn about how to do bad testing, just Google IEE 829 or
ISEB.
If you want to
Hi again!
I do have a lot of questions - at least a few at the moment.
How do you handle ordinal numbers in order to satisfy both the normal
reader as well as screen readers.
a. Today, when a screen reader *might* read both an elements textcontent
and it's title-attribute, it's title
Ross Bruniges skrev:
the abbr and acronym elements have extra value
in the fact that a screen reader will say
out each letter opposed to trying to pronounce the word.
Here is how I understand the difference between an acronym and other
abbreviations:
Acronyms should *not* be spelled as, but
Guys, all i can say is WOW! and thanks alot. I didn't expect many replies
and surprisingly everyone kept on topic (which is good).
I thank everyone for their replies and thanks a million steve, really
appreciate that mate. Ill spend all night tonight on research and as well as
meeting the
Lani is currently on extended leave. Please contact Gillian Foley on 02 6276
6105
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
I will be out of the office on Wednesday 16 January, 2008.
For urgent issues, please contact the Axe Group office on (02) 9966 9336.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
14 matches
Mail list logo
