Hi,
I use an internal web application that someone else coded.
Once I have navigated to URL for this web app (from whenever I was) I can
never go back to where I came from...which is very frustrating.
The developers of the web app say that the back button processing has been
overridden and it
There are a couple of ways of putting links on your page which mimic the
back button that I know of.
One is by using JavaScript, history.back() is what you will want to use. If
you don't want to use JavaScript it is possible through code, well with .Net
at least. You can easily access the
On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:11 AM, Jamie Stewart wrote:
One is by using JavaScript, history.back() is what you will want to
use. If you don't want to use JavaScript it is possible through
code, well with .Net at least. You can easily access the
UrlRefferer which gives you the full URL of the
Hello,
I've been trying to decide which is more semantically correct for an
FAQ, either 2 paragraph (one for the question, one for the answer), a
single paragraph (with spans for formating), or a definition list. I
think the definition list is probably the most appropriate, but at the
same
Hello Christian,
I've been trying to decide which is more semantically correct for an FAQ
[...]
definition list is probably the most appropriate
My vote is in favor of a DL. I feel it is absolutely the most appropriate
element to use in such a case.
Cheers.
Mike Cherim
On Jan 17, 2008, at 10:01 AM, Christian Snodgrass wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to decide which is more semantically correct for an
FAQ, either 2 paragraph (one for the question, one for the answer),
a single paragraph (with spans for formating), or a definition list.
I think the
Thanks everyone for the replies. I think I will go with a definition
list, which is what I was leaning towards in the first place.
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Christian Snodgrass
Sent: Thursday, January 17,
When he designed divaFAQ, Thierry Koblentz felt that DLs were the best
way to go for FAQs.
E. Michael Brandt
www.divahtml.com/products/scripts_dreamweaver_extensions.php
Standards-compliant scripts and Dreamweaver Extensions
--
Hi,
Personally, I'd use heading's for the questions and paragraphs for the
answers but that's down to my own preference and have seen it done a variety
of ways.
Cheers
Dave
- - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 17/01/2008, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
James Pickering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Input/Participation is needed - don't miss these opportunities to have your
say.
Sounds like a fun weekend project.. while the snow falls out here on the
Eastern USA. Also, will be a nice change from all of the OASIS standards that
have been coming
Latest iterations:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/
Input/Participation is needed - don't miss these opportunities to have your say.
James Pickering
Pickering Pages
http://jp29.org/
At 12:23 AM +0530 1/18/08, varun krishnan wrote:
Hi All,
I work for a company where there are about 1000 employees and We are
mainly into Web Development.
Im taking a presentation on Web Standards and the Semantic Web next
week and I want make sure that I put across some really valuable
I think you may talk about the accessibility issues that semantic and web
standards help.
You can show what the use of standards can help in the development.
2008/1/17, varun krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
I work for a company where there are about 1000 employees and We are
mainly into
Hi Varun.
I'm not sure if you're looking for specific examples or techniques
that you'd like to present, or a general overview of why use
standards?
If it's the latter, I would argue that standards, when used well:
* Reduce overall cost of development for cross-browser compatibility
* Assist
varun krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I work for a company where there are about 1000 employees and We are mainly
into Web Development.
Im taking a presentation on Web Standards and the Semantic Web next week and
I want make sure that I put across some really valuable
I will be out of the office from 21 January 2008, returning on 29 January
2008 and will attend to your message then. If your matter is urgent, please
contact either Kenji Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Damian Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
16 matches
Mail list logo