Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread Matt Fellows
Hi Tee,

What John is saying is that AJAX is JavaScript yes, but it can also make
calls to the server (using the XMLHttpRequest object) thus it validates
using server-side technologies such as PHP. But what is misleading is that
validation using AJAX can be disabled quite easily simply by disabling
JavaScript rendering a nice big security hole. That is where the true
server-side validation must double-check.

Actually, as Mike said you can and should use both. Server-side validation
makes the user wait, so using JavaScript is a good thing as it is reactive
and keeps the user informed as to what is going on.

If you are interested, I wrote a small JS library that may be of use to you.
It is a plug'n'play like JS file to automagically validate basic forms which
is totally unobtrusive and promotes separation of concerns. To add extra
fancy AJAX stuff is a matter of overriding a class and implementing your
specific needs. I've still got a bit of work to do on it, but you can
certainly get an idea.

The url is:
http://www.onegeek.com.au/articles/programming/javascript-form-validation.php

I'd be happy to help you if you need, just shoot us through an email.

Cheers,

Matt

On 2/12/08, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 tee wrote:
  Hi, I have a question about server-side vs client-side validation. I
  always use a same PHP form script that works really great and it's
  server-side validation using condition and requirement, and I like the
  feature better than client-side's. A website I was working on, client
  wants client-side validation, something fancy, something Ajax. I like
  to stick with this form script because it has a great support for
  anti-spam; I suppose I can turn off the server-side validation if
  client-side validation is used, but I am concerned with the
  accessibility issue - I am particular curious how screen readers treat
  client-side validation.

 As important as accessibility is, there is an issues many times more
 important which is relevant to your question: security. Unless you
 implement sever-side validation (either in addition to client-side, or
 instead of), neither yours, nor your visitors data is safe. For example,
 via SQL injection your database can become an open book to a cracker.


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread Алексей Новиков
Why client-side *VS* server side? Why *versus*?
They must work together.

1. We cannot dismiss server-side validation for security reasons.
   So, server-side validaion should stay.

2. Client-side script is usable. It checks the form before submission,
   saves user's time and improves user experience.

   Example here: http://blog.micromarketing.ru/contacts/
   (In Russian, but I hope you'll find the form :) )

   And, I believe, client-side validation decreases server load.
   It decreases the quantity of invalid forms submitted by users.
   If the form is valid, server doesn't have to handle errors,
   send error-page, etc.

--- 
Regards,
Alexey Novikov
http://studiomade.ru



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread libwebdev
Kat wrote:
Is Web 2.0 larger than the web itself?


I don't know, but it's certainly *beyond* the web. Librarians around
the world have been flapping their arms and gums about Library 2.0
for ages, which, imo, is even more ridiculous than Web 2.0.

lib.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread tee
Hi Matt, thank you very much! Your JS library looks very interesting  
and  I certainly will play with it. I see that the radio group has not  
been implemented, is this something coming out soon?


The web form has radio buttons with multi-selection options.

Cheers,

tee

On Feb 12, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Matt Fellows wrote:


Hi Tee,

What John is saying is that AJAX is JavaScript yes, but it can also  
make calls to the server (using the XMLHttpRequest object) thus it  
validates using server-side technologies such as PHP. But what is  
misleading is that validation using AJAX can be disabled quite  
easily simply by disabling JavaScript rendering a nice big security  
hole. That is where the true server-side validation must double-check.



If you are interested, I wrote a small JS library that may be of use  
to you. It is a plug'n'play like JS file to automagically validate  
basic forms which is totally unobtrusive and promotes separation of  
concerns. To add extra fancy AJAX stuff is a matter of overriding a  
class and implementing your specific needs. I've still got a bit of  
work to do on it, but you can certainly get an idea.


The url is: 
http://www.onegeek.com.au/articles/programming/javascript-form-validation.php

I'd be happy to help you if you need, just shoot us through an email.




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Katrina

kevin mcmonagle wrote:

yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a genre.


That's an interesting thought. Is Web 2.0 larger than the web itself? 
Has it become an art movement/period, in the same way as Modernism, 
Post-Modernism, Humanism, Impressionism, etc?


Kat


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread Paul Bennett
+1 on this.

I am no l33t h4x0r (by any stretch of the imagination), but even I know I can 
easily circumvent  client-side validation for nefarious purposes in at least 
the following ways:
1. save the form onto my drive, remove all js and submit the form to your 
server url with pretty much any data I like in it
2. switch off javascript and mash that submit button

Web apps should be built to work first without JS, and then the js behaviour 
should be layered over the top:
http://domscripting.com/blog/display/41

:)
Paul


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread Breton Slivka
It should be made clear that there really is no such thing as Client
Side Validation. What we are talking about here is client side form
assistance. The goal of validation is to make 100% sure that the data
you are recieving is of the correct type, and contains no extraneous
data or security exploits BEFORE depositing it into a database or
running other type sensitive functions across it.  This is why you
must perform validation on the server side, because that's the part
you can control, so you can make sure from there that the data is
correct.


 There is absolutely no certainty about whether the data you are
receiving from the client is valid, regardless of what javascript you
have running. The data could be coming from anywhere! not just desktop
browsers with javascript. Thus, there can be no such thing as client
side validation.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread kevin mcmonagle

yes its a buzzword mostly but from a design standpoint its also a genre.


Thomas Thomassen wrote:

Nothing. Web 2.0 is a buzzword. There's nothing truely new.
It's often accociated with social networking. Sites where the users 
provide the content.
 





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Thomas Thomassen
Nothing. Web 2.0 is a buzzword. There's nothing truely new.
It's often accociated with social networking. Sites where the users provide the 
content.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Gitanjali 
  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [WSG] hello


  What is the difference between normal web template and web 2.0 templates???


  On Feb 12, 2008 6:40 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello aleagi

Thank you very much..


On Feb 12, 2008 6:17 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hello Gitanjali,

  In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.

  There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
  between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...

  But, in general, the design must be clean and balanced.

  If this can help:
  http://www.templateworld.com/all_web_2.0_templates_1.html

  But, web 2.0 is more about structure of the pages like XHTML 1.0
  Strict (or 1.1) without errors, CSS well structured, tableless, WCAG
  1, 2 and 3...

  So, if your pages are already with this elements (well coded), the
  design will be a very easy thing to do. An advice: less is more! @;]

  Have a nice day!


  Regards,
  Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
  -
  Nosce te ipsum
  -
  http://sapiensdc.com.br





  On Feb 12, 2008 10:26 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hello aleagi!
  
   i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0
  
  
  
  
  
  
   On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Hello Gitanjali,
   
Help with what?
   
Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...
   
What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).
   
Regards,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br
   
   
On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello all!

 Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please

 --
 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***
   
   
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
   
   
  
  
  
   --
  
  
   Regards.
   Gitanjali,
   Web Designer.
  
   ***
   List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ***


  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***






-- 
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.




  -- 
  Regards.
  Gitanjali,
  Web Designer.

  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


[WSG] tableless forms !!!

2008-02-12 Thread Naveen_Bhaskar
Hi ,

 

Could anyone tell me which is the best way to build a form without
tables in w3c standards.

 I would really appreciate if you can provide a good referral link. J

 

Thanks a ton in advance..

 

Thanking you

Naveen Bhaskar 

 



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: [WSG] tableless forms !!!

2008-02-12 Thread Chris Broadfoot

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi ,

 

Could anyone tell me which is the best way to build a form without 
tables in w3c standards.


 I would really appreciate if you can provide a good referral link. J

 


Thanks a ton in advance..

 


Thanking you

*Naveen Bhaskar *



Please read the thread that's been going in the past week called 
Styling Forms


Chris


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] tableless forms !!!

2008-02-12 Thread Jermayn Parker
best to use are fieldsets and in the fieldsets you can either use p
tags or lists (depending on what side you swing)



On Feb 13, 2008 3:01 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hi ,



 Could anyone tell me which is the best way to build a form without tables in
 w3c standards.

  I would really appreciate if you can provide a good referral link. J



 Thanks a ton in advance..



 Thanking you

 Naveen Bhaskar


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



-- 
JP2 Designs
http://www.jp2designs.com

http://www.germworks.net


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] tableless forms !!!

2008-02-12 Thread John Faulds
Plenty of references here:  
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2006/11/11/css-based-forms-modern-solutions/


On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:26 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi ,


Could anyone tell me which is the best way to build a form without
tables in w3c standards.

 I would really appreciate if you can provide a good referral link. J


Thanks a ton in advance..


Thanking you

Naveen Bhaskar




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




--
Tyssen Design
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread Mordechai Peller

Matt Fellows wrote:
What John is saying is that AJAX is JavaScript yes, but it can also 
make calls to the server (using the XMLHttpRequest object) thus it 
validates using server-side technologies such as PHP.
What you describe is what AJAX actually is; however, the term is often 
misused to include any action or change to the page which doesn't 
include a page refresh. Whether it's drag-and-drop, or popping up an 
error message (especially without a JavaScript alert box), that's AJAX, 
or at least according to most clients. It was my impression that Tee was 
making that error. So, whether the validation done before leaving the 
page was done client-side or server-side via (true) AJAX is irrelevant. 
What is most important is that the data is validated AFTER YOU LEAVE THE 
PAGE, even if it was already validated before.
But what is misleading is that validation using AJAX can be disabled 
quite easily simply by disabling JavaScript rendering a nice big 
security hole.
Even with JavaScript working perfectly, it's child's play to send 
whatever garbage (or worse) you want to the server. For example, there's 
a Firefox add-on, Tamper Data, which allows you to intercept and modify 
all calls to the server. So the issue of whether or not JavaScript is 
enabled is irrelevant to that nice big security hole.

That is where the true server-side validation must double-check.

And that's my bottom line.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread aleagi
Hello Gitanjali,

Well, in my opinion, web 2.0 templates is more clean, spaced, balanced
and don't use elements like borders and heavy background images.

For instance, http://google.com, is the most web 2.0 that I know. @:D

Another ones:
http://del.icio.us/
http://furl.net/
http://digg.com/

What is common between this sites?

1. Clean as possible designs;
2. There's a box: round corner!
3. dégradé (gradient);

But, the most important of all:
Less is more.

There's a lot of sites that can inspire you to construct a web 2.0 template:

http://csszengarden.com/
http://cssremix.com/

Regards,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br





On Feb 12, 2008 11:21 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What is the difference between normal web template and web 2.0 templates???


 On Feb 12, 2008 6:40 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  Hello aleagi
 
  Thank you very much..
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Feb 12, 2008 6:17 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hello Gitanjali,
  
   In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.
  
   There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
   between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...
  
   But, in general, the design must be clean and balanced.
  
   If this can help:
   http://www.templateworld.com/all_web_2.0_templates_1.html
  
   But, web 2.0 is more about structure of the pages like XHTML 1.0
   Strict (or 1.1) without errors, CSS well structured, tableless, WCAG
   1, 2 and 3...
  
   So, if your pages are already with this elements (well coded), the
   design will be a very easy thing to do. An advice: less is more! @;]
  
   Have a nice day!
  
  
   Regards,
   Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
   -
   Nosce te ipsum
   -
   http://sapiensdc.com.br
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   On Feb 12, 2008 10:26 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello aleagi!
   
i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0
   
   
   
   
   
   
On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Hello Gitanjali,

 Help with what?

 Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...

 What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).

 Regards,
 Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
 -
 Nosce te ipsum
 -
 http://sapiensdc.com.br


 On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello all!
 
  Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
 
  --
  Regards.
  Gitanjali,
  Web Designer.
 
 
 ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ***


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


   
   
   
--
   
   
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.
   
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
  
  
   ***
   List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ***
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Regards.
  Gitanjali,
  Web Designer.
 



 --


 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

2008-02-12 Thread Matt Fellows
Hi Tee,

It sure is, I have actually implemented it locally but a bit of testing is
needed. It was more a test-of-prinicple kind of thing that actually turned
out useful.

So we don't move off topic however, I will reply to your email privately
about the library instead of the WSG list.

Cheers,

Matt

On 2/13/08, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Matt, thank you very much! Your JS library looks very interesting
 and  I certainly will play with it. I see that the radio group has not
 been implemented, is this something coming out soon?

 The web form has radio buttons with multi-selection options.

 Cheers,

 tee

 On Feb 12, 2008, at 2:12 AM, Matt Fellows wrote:

  Hi Tee,
 
  What John is saying is that AJAX is JavaScript yes, but it can also
  make calls to the server (using the XMLHttpRequest object) thus it
  validates using server-side technologies such as PHP. But what is
  misleading is that validation using AJAX can be disabled quite
  easily simply by disabling JavaScript rendering a nice big security
  hole. That is where the true server-side validation must double-check.
 
 
  If you are interested, I wrote a small JS library that may be of use
  to you. It is a plug'n'play like JS file to automagically validate
  basic forms which is totally unobtrusive and promotes separation of
  concerns. To add extra fancy AJAX stuff is a matter of overriding a
  class and implementing your specific needs. I've still got a bit of
  work to do on it, but you can certainly get an idea.
 
  The url is:
 http://www.onegeek.com.au/articles/programming/javascript-form-validation.php
 
  I'd be happy to help you if you need, just shoot us through an email.



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread aleagi
Hello Dave,

I supose you've said the right thing.

The most important thing is to be closes as possible to web standards,
accessibility and usability.

For the visual, in my sight, there's only one rule to be followed:
KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid. @:D

Best Regards from hot as hell Brazil,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br




On Feb 12, 2008 11:34 AM, Dave Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Also, think about the important factors first when creating a website. Build
 something that satisfies the requirements, provides the function/content
 required, is accessible, usable and uses the latest web standards and if the
 site falls into the web2.0 category then so be it, if not then really who
 cares?



 On 12/02/2008, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions of web
 2.0:
 
 http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2
 
  A good slide show on the topic:
  http://www.andybudd.com/presentations/dcontruct05/
 
  Or, sit down with some popcorn and watch a web 2.0 video:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc
 
  HTH
  Russ
 
 
 
  on 12/2/08 11:07 PM, Gitanjali at wrote:
 
 
 
  Hello all!
 
  Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
 
 
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread russ - maxdesign
Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions of web
2.0:
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.h
tml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2

A good slide show on the topic:
http://www.andybudd.com/presentations/dcontruct05/

Or, sit down with some popcorn and watch a web 2.0 video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc

HTH
Russ


on 12/2/08 11:07 PM, Gitanjali at wrote:

 Hello all!
  
 Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Gitanjali
Hello aleagi

Thank you very much..

On Feb 12, 2008 6:17 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello Gitanjali,

 In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.

 There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
 between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...

 But, in general, the design must be clean and balanced.

 If this can help:
 http://www.templateworld.com/all_web_2.0_templates_1.html

 But, web 2.0 is more about structure of the pages like XHTML 1.0
 Strict (or 1.1) without errors, CSS well structured, tableless, WCAG
 1, 2 and 3...

 So, if your pages are already with this elements (well coded), the
 design will be a very easy thing to do. An advice: less is more! @;]

 Have a nice day!

 Regards,
 Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
 -
 Nosce te ipsum
 -
 http://sapiensdc.com.br




  On Feb 12, 2008 10:26 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello aleagi!
 
  i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hello Gitanjali,
  
   Help with what?
  
   Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...
  
   What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).
  
   Regards,
   Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
   -
   Nosce te ipsum
   -
   http://sapiensdc.com.br
  
  
   On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
   
Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
   
--
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.
   
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
  
  
   ***
   List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ***
  
  
 
 
 
  --
 
 
  Regards.
  Gitanjali,
  Web Designer.
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Gitanjali
What is the difference between normal web template and web 2.0 templates???

On Feb 12, 2008 6:40 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello aleagi

 Thank you very much..

   On Feb 12, 2008 6:17 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hello Gitanjali,
 
  In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.
 
  There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
  between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...
 
  But, in general, the design must be clean and balanced.
 
  If this can help:
  http://www.templateworld.com/all_web_2.0_templates_1.html
 
  But, web 2.0 is more about structure of the pages like XHTML 1.0
  Strict (or 1.1) without errors, CSS well structured, tableless, WCAG
  1, 2 and 3...
 
  So, if your pages are already with this elements (well coded), the
  design will be a very easy thing to do. An advice: less is more! @;]
 
  Have a nice day!
 
  Regards,
  Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
  -
  Nosce te ipsum
  -
  http://sapiensdc.com.br
 
 
 
 
   On Feb 12, 2008 10:26 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hello aleagi!
  
   i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0
  
  
  
  
  
  
   On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Hello Gitanjali,
   
Help with what?
   
Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...
   
What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).
   
Regards,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br
   
   
On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello all!

 Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please

 --
 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.


  ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  ***
   
   
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
   
   
  
  
  
   --
  
  
   Regards.
   Gitanjali,
   Web Designer.
  
   ***
   List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ***
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 
 


 --
 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.




-- 
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread aleagi
Hello Gitanjali,

In general, there's no rule to design to web 2.0.

There's a myth concerning that you have to use shades, a lot of spaces
between elements, large font sizes, and stuff...

But, in general, the design must be clean and balanced.

If this can help:
http://www.templateworld.com/all_web_2.0_templates_1.html

But, web 2.0 is more about structure of the pages like XHTML 1.0
Strict (or 1.1) without errors, CSS well structured, tableless, WCAG
1, 2 and 3...

So, if your pages are already with this elements (well coded), the
design will be a very easy thing to do. An advice: less is more! @;]

Have a nice day!

Regards,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br




On Feb 12, 2008 10:26 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello aleagi!

 i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0






 On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hello Gitanjali,
 
  Help with what?
 
  Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...
 
  What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).
 
  Regards,
  Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
  -
  Nosce te ipsum
  -
  http://sapiensdc.com.br
 
 
  On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hello all!
  
   Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
  
   --
   Regards.
   Gitanjali,
   Web Designer.
  
   ***
   List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
   Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ***
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 
 



 --


 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Gitanjali
Actually i want to know wat is web 2.0, what is the difference between web
designing and web 2.0, how to design a template using web 2.0 etc..
is it a software or an application??
should v download det software? if yes den from where?




On Feb 12, 2008 5:50 PM, varun krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey Gitanjali,

 What help you want with Web 2.0 ?

 Are you a general web designer moving into Web2.0 Design ?

 regards,

 Varun
 Web Technologist
 http://varunkrish.com


 On Feb 12, 2008 5:37 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hello all!
 
  Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
 
  --
  Regards.
  Gitanjali,
  Web Designer.
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] tableless forms !!!

2008-02-12 Thread Naveen_Bhaskar
Yes.. I got the solution... thanks guys...


Regards
Naveen bhaskar

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Faulds
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 12:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] tableless forms !!!

Plenty of references here:  
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2006/11/11/css-based-forms-modern-soluti
ons/

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:01:26 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi ,


 Could anyone tell me which is the best way to build a form without
 tables in w3c standards.

  I would really appreciate if you can provide a good referral link. J


 Thanks a ton in advance..


 Thanking you

 Naveen Bhaskar




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



-- 
Tyssen Design
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Gitanjali
Hello aleagi!

i want to know what is web 2.0 and how to do a template using web 2.0




On Feb 12, 2008 5:45 PM, aleagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello Gitanjali,

 Help with what?

 Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...

 What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).

 Regards,
 Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
 -
 Nosce te ipsum
 -
 http://sapiensdc.com.br


 On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello all!
 
  Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please
 
  --
  Regards.
  Gitanjali,
  Web Designer.
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread varun krishnan
Hey Gitanjali,

What help you want with Web 2.0 ?

Are you a general web designer moving into Web2.0 Design ?

regards,

Varun
Web Technologist
http://varunkrish.com

On Feb 12, 2008 5:37 PM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello all!

 Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please

 --
 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread aleagi
Hello Gitanjali,

Help with what?

Web 2.0 is a concept that has a lot of subjects to be discussed...

What do you want to know about web 2.0? (If this exists at all).

Regards,
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes
-
Nosce te ipsum
-
http://sapiensdc.com.br


On Feb 12, 2008 10:07 AM, Gitanjali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello all!

 Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please

 --
 Regards.
 Gitanjali,
 Web Designer.

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Gitanjali
Hello all!

Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please

-- 
Regards.
Gitanjali,
Web Designer.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Decorative bolding

2008-02-12 Thread Rochester oliveira
if the intention is give emphasis to this word use em or if is to give
stronger emphasis use strong

2008/2/12, Thomas Thomassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 The branding might change. I'm in favour of span with a class, like: span
 class=logo.


 - Original Message -
 From: Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:42 AM
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Decorative bolding


  Do I:
  a. Use the b tag, or...
  b. Use a span tag and bold it using CSS?
 
  I'd use span, b is deprecated
 
 
  Actually it's not deprecated, not in HTML 4, 5 or XHTML 1. If ever there
  was a case for the use the 'b' element, this might be a good one.
 
  ---
 
  Strong is important so, as Rachel stated, it isn't appropriate. A span
  is fine as others have pointed out, but the b element might also be a
  sound choice in this case. The b element is a highlight of sorts. That
 is
  its semantic value, its role as an element in a web document.
 
  From HTML 5:
  blockquote
  The b element represents a span of text to be stylistically offset from
  the normal prose without conveying any extra importance, such as key
 words
  in a document abstract, product names in a review, or other spans of
 text
  whose typical typographic presentation is boldened.
  /blockquote
 
  It is bold without the importance, at least that is its default
 rendering.
  Remember, just because it is bold might not necessarily mean that it is
 a
  style. All elements have a default rendering. Strong is bold and so
 are
  headings. They all have a role, and we don't think of those as a style.
 
  A better way to answer the original question might be to ask: Do you
 want
  the value retained in the mark-up, or is it purely a style that
 painted
  onto the presentational layer? Or, worded another way, should the
 boldened
  treatment exist without styles?
 
  If it should, then the b might be best. Otherwise I heartily agreee that
  the span element should be used.
 
  Respectfully,
  Mike Cherim
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
[]'s

-
Rochester Oliveira
http://webbemfeita.com/
Viva a Web-Bem-Feita
Web Designer
Curitiba - PR - Brasil


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread Dave Woods
Also, think about the important factors first when creating a website. Build
something that satisfies the requirements, provides the function/content
required, is accessible, usable and uses the latest web standards and if the
site falls into the web2.0 category then so be it, if not then really who
cares?


On 12/02/2008, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions of web
 2.0:

 http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2

 A good slide show on the topic:
 http://www.andybudd.com/presentations/dcontruct05/

 Or, sit down with some popcorn and watch a web 2.0 video:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LzQIUANnHc

 HTH
 Russ


 on 12/2/08 11:07 PM, Gitanjali at wrote:

 Hello all!

 Can anybody help me in web 2.0 please



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] hello

2008-02-12 Thread michael.brockington
Basically, there is no difference.
Web 2 is basically just marketing-speak, loosely meaning The Currently
Fashionable Thing
 
Regards,
Mike
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gitanjali
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:21 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] hello



What is the difference between normal web template and web 2.0
templates???

 



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***