RE: [WSG] [OT] Posting [was:Best way to hide form legends?]

2008-05-01 Thread michael.brockington
Maybe for you, but for many of us, a carefully edited reply makes perfect sense. Failing to ever truncate a conversation may be wasteful, but even then, by top-posting you allow people to easily check previous messages that have since been deleted. The message that you are quoting was neither

[WSG] will this ever validate?(swfobject 2.0)

2008-05-01 Thread kevin mcmonagle
Hi, Im trying swf object 2.0. http://www.seaviewnightclub.com/mockup2.html Im using the static-standards compliant method that uses conditional comments. I thought it would validate better than this. Theres a lot of unclosed errors on the param tags. Should i just self close those i

Re: [WSG] will this ever validate?(swfobject 2.0)

2008-05-01 Thread Joseph Taylor
All the javascript methods for embedding flash use a script within the page to replace a div with the flash code, which is another way validation fails. If you write an unobtrusive script that adds the script tag to the page once the dom loads, you can write a fallback for the flash for

[WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Dean Matthews
When you set up an anchor rule that has an underline on hover meant for text, is there a simple way to prevent the underline on image links in the same ID or do you have to set up a separate class with anchor rules? Thanks, Dean

Re: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Benjamin White
On 5/1/08, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you set up an anchor rule that has an underline on hover meant for text, is there a simple way to prevent the underline on image links in the same ID or do you have to set up a separate class with anchor rules? By underline do you mean the

Re: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Mahendran Venkatesan
* **img a *{ text-decoration : none; } Is there any chance 'img' can be a parent of 'anchor' tag? I suggest the following: a.someclassname{text-decoration:none;} OR a{text-decoration:none;} Thanks! Venkatesan M On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL

[WSG] making big selections

2008-05-01 Thread Andrew Harris
Been having problems with deciding on the best user interface for a particular type of form input (for an intranet application). When we have a list of values from which a user can select one or more items, there are a couple of choices. - we can use checkboxes, which is nice and easy for (lets

Re: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Adam Martin
it should be: a img { } On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Mahendran Venkatesan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * **img a *{ text-decoration : none; } Is there any chance 'img' can be a parent of 'anchor' tag? I suggest the following: a.someclassname{text-decoration:none;} OR

Re: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Hi Venkatesan, Is there any chance 'img' can be a parent of 'anchor' tag? How about this then: a img, img a { text-decoration : none; } This is a fuller version with some interaction as a usability enahancement. img, a img, img a { text-decoration : none; border : 2px solid #ccc; /* try

RE: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Jason Gray
a img{ border:none; } Isn't the order decided based on how you have coded the inline elements? Maybe someone else can clarify...? Regards Jason Gray Webwidget Pty Ltd ABN 27 122 916 134 | PO Box 2633 Taren Point NSW 2229 | Ph 0423 038 000 | Fax 02

Re: [WSG] Image links

2008-05-01 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
it should be: a img { } Ah, yeah, duh, sorry can't do img a. Drop that from my previous example please. It's late, I'll Tweet my goof and go to bed :) Mike *** List Guidelines: