Re: [WSG] Embed a flash file 100%

2008-05-14 Thread nate hanna
var so = new SWFObject("main.swf", "main", "100%", "100%", "8", "#ff"); The value of #ff is what is causing your white bg at the top; this ends up being the "bgcolor" attribute of the embed tag and is used as the stage background color in flash unless you set the window mode (wmode) to "tra

[WSG] IE6 background image positioning problem

2008-05-14 Thread Susie Gardner-Brown
Hi there I'm sure I should know how to fix this but I can't! http://crunchie.tedi.uq.edu.au/trials/UCTLC/index6.html http://crunchie.tedi.uq.edu.au/trials/UCTLC/uctlc6.css That big image on the right is a bg image in a container that has absolute positioning. It works fine in Firefox on my Mac,

Re: [WSG] Feedback - ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED

2008-05-14 Thread russ - maxdesign
ADMIN _ THREAD CLOSED Hi Matthew, Happy to chat with you about mail list options, but this should be sent to the list admins, rather than to the list. All of these sort of comments, enquiries, suggestions should go to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Russ on 15/5/08 8:50 AM, Matthew Chambers at wrot

Re: [WSG] Feedback

2008-05-14 Thread dwain
hi matthew, why don't you make your settings to get individual emails? then you could scan all of the conversations and have your pick. cheers, dwain On 5/14/08, Matthew Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear sir / madam > > I recently joined this mailing list and signed up for the daily dig

[WSG] Feedback

2008-05-14 Thread Matthew Chambers
Dear sir / madam I recently joined this mailing list and signed up for the daily digest however I'm finding the digest hard to skim through to see if there is anything of interest to me. It would be great if you had the subject summary list at the top of the email which shows each of the conversat

Re: [WSG] Large Background Images

2008-05-14 Thread David Owens
A quick Google seems to suggest it can. http://icanhaz.com/litelerpicturz David On 14 May 2008, at 19:14, Chris Kennon wrote: Hi, Could this be done with PS? Chris On May 14, 2008, at 4:11 AM, David Owens wrote: Hi, I've been wrestling with one of these for a while. I've found that the

Re: [WSG] Large Background Images

2008-05-14 Thread Chris Kennon
Love the BBC option and the one below. Thanks. On May 13, 2008, at 10:39 PM, David Hucklesby wrote: On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:11:29 -0400, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote: Hi Chris, bandwidth. However standards are still a concern, what perils of wisdom for using a "full-page" BG can the list c

Re: [WSG] Large Background Images

2008-05-14 Thread Chris Kennon
Hi, Could this be done with PS? Chris On May 14, 2008, at 4:11 AM, David Owens wrote: Hi, I've been wrestling with one of these for a while. I've found that the ability to create jpgs with various degrees of compression in Fireworks is pretty handy. It means that an area which will be c

[WSG] Sorry, Campbell Craig is out of the office.

2008-05-14 Thread campbell . craig
I will be out of the office starting 14/05/2008 and will not return until 19/05/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. If it is a matter of urgency, feel free to contact me on my mobile on +61422029994. The

Re: [WSG] Large Background Images

2008-05-14 Thread David Owens
Hi, I've been wrestling with one of these for a while. I've found that the ability to create jpgs with various degrees of compression in Fireworks is pretty handy. It means that an area which will be covered up by other content can be compressed more than the parts of the image which will

Re: [WSG] XHTML 1.1 & CSS3 - Is it worth using right now?

2008-05-14 Thread David Dorward
On 14 May 2008, at 05:26, Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote: Nikita wrote: the META tag would have to end in a /> and then it wouldn't be valid HTML anymore. I encourage you to try that with the W3C validator. You will not get the result you expect. Comes back as valid HTML, as I expected

Re: [WSG] XHTML 1.1 & CSS3 - Is it worth using right now?

2008-05-14 Thread Dean Edridge
Dean Matthews wrote: On May 13, 2008, at 3:44 PM, dwain wrote: where is it and is it incorporated into firefox yet? dwain On 5/12/08, Dean Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 12, 2008, at 11:13 PM, dwain wrote: and if you are wanting valid css then css3 will throw up errors in the w