Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css hacks i used. Is there a way to
hide those hacks when i validate it?
--
Fuji kusaka
***
List Guidelines:
Hi Fuji - Not sure what type of hacks you have used in, presumably thinking
some of these types
like _ and * for IE versions.
Those _ * will show errors when you validate, better option to use
conditional comments
Sundar
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Fuji kusaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say plug your code directly into the W3C CSS validator
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_input
and delete the hacks.
However i have used hacks before and found that they did still pass through the
validator.
Could there be errors in your hacks.
Also, just as a note,
Ive use
#min-height:300px !important;
*html #mainContent{
behavior: url(iepngfix.htc) !important;
but cant get those validation..
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM, sundar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fuji - Not sure what type of hacks you have used in, presumably thinking
some of
hi,
not sure what's going on in your CSS exactly.
but behavior is non-standard, it's a microsoft thing. with that png fix
I don't think you'll ever get it to validate but I could be wrong.
what's the hash (#) in front of min-height, is min-height an id? and
which element or selector is it
Fuji kusaka wrote:
#min-height:300px !important;
This should be:
SomeSelector {min-height:300px !important;}
What SomeSelector is, some selector.
*html #mainContent{
You need a space between * and html
behavior: url(iepngfix.htc) !important;
This will never validated because it's IE only.
I'm assuming most of the hacks are for IE? Why not just conditionally
include them, i.e. unless the validator obeys IE policies, it won't even
see the IE-specifi CSS.
Dave
Fuji kusaka wrote:
Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css
Hi Patrick,
i know thats the case with flash but what about the css/xhtml no flash
content that validates when you use swf object 2.0 static method. If
theres no flash support it degrades to normal xhtml navigation.
A more specific question is if the majority of users are using the flash
to
I agree, this is not web standards. However remember they could be
following web standards with their CSS version.
and I don't think it is just in the UK, it is every where for Vodafone.
Which not only defies any effort you made to put the thing together for
presentation standards as well.
On 25 Jun 2008, at 00:35, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Using swf object 2.0 embeded swfs as an xhtml sites primary
navigation - what are the liabilities?
Assuming SWFObject 2 is like SWFObject 1 it writes your Flash file
into a named Div. This div can (and should) hold alternative/falback
hi lynette,
check out http://www.studiokdd.com/ the site still isn't finished
under the hood, because i still need to add long descriptions. maybe
your client could see that content with keywords can be tastefully
done without clutter. remember, it's all about design!
cheers,
dwain
On 6/24/08,
Rick Lecoat wrote:
If the visitor has Flash then the Flash swf replaces the alternative
content. If they don't (or if they don't have javascript turned on)
then they'll get the fallback content, which should also suffice for
search engines. (Of course, don't make your fallback navigation
Regardless of whether you stick alternative navigation in the div that's
going to be replaced, I've personally found using Flash for navigation about
the worst use of Flash possible. Are you sure that you cannot achieve what
you want by using HTML with some enhancements thrown in by javascript?
If the number of times the font is used per page isn't excessive, you could
also resort to sIFR3 for font replacement.
Check: http://novemberborn.net/sifr3 for more information.
If you need help with this, you can contact me off-list. :)
Gr.
Matijs
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Lynette
There isn't really a way for a search engine to see how many times a link
has been clicked. It is however possible for a search engine to see / count
how many links are pointing to a page (either internally or externally),
thereby measuring its 'popularity'.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:44 PM,
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/scripts.html#edef-SCRIPT
*Start tag: required, End tag: required*
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#prohibitions
C.3. Element Minimization and Empty Element Content
Given an empty instance of an element whose content model is not EMPTY (for
example, an empty
Thank you matijs thats what i was wondering, you make a good point about
using javascript but im not an expert in using it.
Matijs wrote:
There isn't really a way for a search engine to see how many times a
link has been clicked. It is however possible for a search engine to
see / count how
On 25 Jun 2008, at 11:49, Matijs wrote:
Regardless of whether you stick alternative navigation in the div
that's going to be replaced, I've personally found using Flash for
navigation about the worst use of Flash possible. Are you sure that
you cannot achieve what you want by using HTML
any good standards based tutorials out there for adding them to regular
xhtml pages?
-best
kevin
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Best one I've seen and used is at Veerle Pieters' blog:
http://veerle.duoh.com/blog/comments/fickr_badge_w3c_valid/
Melissa
Web Developer Graphic Designer
www.technocolor.net
On Jun 25, 2008, at 7:45 AM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
any good standards based tutorials out there for adding
Michael,
My understanding is that they have different styles targeted for the
different handsets and that is the other justification for carrying out
such an exercise.
William
Michael MD wrote:
I agree, this is not web standards. However remember they could be
following web standards
I know that there are a lot of free javascript libraries available for
you to use without having to go to the extent of programming your own
javascript features.
things like dhtml goodies and scriptaculous, I'm sure the group has some
other options but this is getting off topic now. a quick
Thanks thats just what i was looking for.
Melissa wrote:
Best one I've seen and used is at Veerle Pieters' blog:
http://veerle.duoh.com/blog/comments/fickr_badge_w3c_valid/
***
List Guidelines:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael MD
Sent: 25 June 2008 11:10
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: RE: [WSG] Mobile phone support of CSS
I agree, this is not web standards. However remember they could be
following web
24 matches
Mail list logo
