On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:55 PM, David McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For a while now, I've been operating on the principle Code for Firefox,
hack for IE.
That is, writing CSS for the most standards-compliant browser, and then
making adjustments for non-standard behaviour.
I said
Interesting to read the many comments on this. It's utilising Webkit as a
rendering engine (also behind Safari and Konquerer 4), which is BSD and LGPL
licensed. In turn Google say they are licensing Chrome as Open Source, meaning
depending on the actual license, items like V8
There is an interesting and very humorous comic that describes Chrome:
http://books.google.com/books?id=8UsqHohwwVYCprintsec=frontcover#PPA19,M1
I like the multi-threading.
--
The generation that used acid to escape reality is now taking antacid to deal
with reality.
I am looking forward to Google's Chrome browser.
I have been on many IRC channels today, and on many forums and everyones
talking about Chrome. Its got more hype than FF3 had, so lets hope it loves
up to the hype.
***
List
Why not just user Safari for Windows rather than Opera to get an idea
how Safari works?
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
willdonovan wrote:
I would have to agree with the others here.
Coding for / with FF is easier because of the
I like the IE6Blocker from Chris Coyier, check it out at
http://css-tricks.com/ie-6-blocker-script/
I made a spanish translation of IE6Blocker, download it from
http://espadas.com.mx/2008/09/01/bloqueando-internet-explorer-6/
Gregorio Espadas
http://espadas.com.mx
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:37
Gregorio Espadas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the IE6Blocker from Chris Coyier, check it out at
http://css-tricks.com/ie-6-blocker-script/
I made a spanish translation of IE6Blocker, download it from
http://espadas.com.mx/2008/09/01/bloqueando-internet-explorer-6/
Gregorio
IMHO it seems to me to be a violation of web standards to tell the user
what browser to use.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Gregorio Espadas wrote:
I like the IE6Blocker from Chris Coyier, check it out at
2008/9/2 Gregorio Espadas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like the IE6Blocker from Chris Coyier, check it out at
http://css-tricks.com/ie-6-blocker-script/
In my opinion this is worst practice.
First priority should be for a website to make the content available
to as many people as possible. Browser
I agree that it's not a good idea to flat out block someone from
browsing your website with a certain browser. That reminds me of way
back when during the IE/Netscape wars where half the pages you would go
to had a block for one or the other.
I think a better idea if you want to drop IE6
Also Spracht Jens Brueckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my opinion this is worst practice.
First priority should be for a website
to make the content available to as
many people as possible. Browser
discrimination is at least as bad as
accessibility and usability violations.
I remember back
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Jens Brueckmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/2 Gregorio Espadas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like the IE6Blocker from Chris Coyier, check it out at
http://css-tricks.com/ie-6-blocker-script/
ONLY if a web application absolutely relies on certain javascript
methods
Yet another thing that is Facebook specific that I just thought about. I
may be overstating this, since I have no actual statistics to back it
up, but I'd wager that a very large part of Facebook's population is
from the more tech-savvy generations, so their usage statistics of IE6
may be far
Christian Snodgrass wrote:
Yet another thing that is Facebook specific that I just thought about.
I may be overstating this, since I have no actual statistics to back
it up, but I'd wager that a very large part of Facebook's population
is from the more tech-savvy generations, so their usage
Most schools around here don't even allow win2k on their network anymore.
An interesting discussion.
Agree that Facebook is an application and not a website - and an absolutely
huge and complex one.
From what I can see, Facebook is doing the right thing... offering full
support for latest
On Sep 2, 2008, at 5:24 AM, James Ellis wrote:
Interesting to read the many comments on this. It's utilising Webkit
as a rendering engine (also behind Safari and Konquerer 4), which is
BSD and LGPL licensed. In turn Google say they are licensing Chrome
as Open Source, meaning depending on
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
On Tue 2/09/08 10:18 PM , tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 5:24 AM, James Ellis wrote:
Interesting to read the many comments on this. It's utilising
Webkit
as a rendering engine (also
This may be acceptable for facebook if thier statistics indicate a low
amount of IE6 users, however I think this is hardly acceptable for a
majority of my audience, which includes many proffesionals who still
run IE6 so they can use company intranets, etc.
I would love nothing more than to
On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
It has no Mac version! :(
tee
***
List Guidelines:
Can't wait to get into the office!!!
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 03/09/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
On Tue 2/09/08 10:18 PM , tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at
Quoting russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Most schools around here don't even allow win2k on their network anymore.
An interesting discussion.
Agree that Facebook is an application and not a website - and an absolutely
huge and complex one.
From what I can see, Facebook is doing the
tee wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
It has no Mac version! :(
Nor Unix.
--
~~~
TheHolierGrail.com | MacNimble.com | Cyber-Sandbox.com | Anytowne.com
Bill Brown,
That was heavily talked about accross most topics already.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 03/09/2008, at 7:41 AM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:41 PM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
It has no Mac version! :(
Nor Linux! (But they're coming... eventually.)
--
Scott
Unless you're behind a firewall which requires proxy auth. In this case, you'll
need to wait until tonight :(
http://thingsilearn.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/attention-software-developers-dont-make-assumptions-about-my-internet-connection/
Hi Tee,
According to product info, it's been in private beta for a while.
This is the first public beta (well, to 100 or so countries anyway)
Rest assured a Mac ( *Nix ?) version will follow soon :)
Paul
***
List Guidelines:
Heh. Looks like somebody at Google is a big fan of Understanding Comics
By Scott McCloud. This is nice though.
Regards,
Spell
Michael Spellacy
Senior User Interface Developer
TMP Worldwide Advertising Communications, LLC
205 Hudson Street, 5th Floor
New York, NY 10013
-Original
Just downloaded it. Seems that yet another blue chip is using a browsing
phishing tool, this time it was to rely specific download instructions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Spellacy, Michael
Sent: 02 September 2008 23:11
To:
Just tried it. It is fast.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
Bill Brown wrote:
tee wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
It has no Mac version! :(
Nor Unix.
I thought it was about the same speed as Firefox 3, though memory usage
is much improved and the multi-threading has improved the speed of web
apps running in multiple windows.
Of course they could bite the bullet and make it red - then it would be
faster...
I know, I tired it on a couple of the more intensive ajax dependent
pages I've been working on and it puts FF to shame.
If people realize how much faster they can surf the web - this thing
is going to take off big time.
On 03/09/2008, at 10:01 AM, Michael Horowitz wrote:
Just tried it.
Indeed. We have some very clunky sites and they loaded almost
instantly. I couldn't believe the rendering speed.
However Gmail won't load on any computers with Chrome on at work (in
fact, I can't sign in to any google services). Is this problem
affecting everyone or is it just our network? If
Google Chrome wasn't working for me in the office either, but I think its
all due to the firewall and proxy that we have setup here. It couldn't seem
to negotiate between the proxy and the installer. I just hooked it up to an
outside ADSL connection (my work PC that is), and typing this Email
working fine my end.
On 03/09/2008, at 10:43 AM, Blake wrote:
Indeed. We have some very clunky sites and they loaded almost
instantly. I couldn't believe the rendering speed.
However Gmail won't load on any computers with Chrome on at work (in
fact, I can't sign in to any google services).
However Gmail won't load on any computers with Chrome on at work (in
fact, I can't sign in to any google services). Is this problem
affecting everyone or is it just our network? If it's affecting
everyone that's pretty massive fail for Google.
We had that problem here but it turned out to be a
Oh, the browser works fine. I can access everything except google
services which require me to login. It just attempts to redirect to
their authentication page and kind of... stops. Loads for a while then
nothing, just a blank white page.
Again, only Google services, so kind of epic fail.
On
You can grab the source from : http://code.google.com/chromium/
http://dev.chromium.org/Home and try to build it if you want ..
According to the site, it won't (yet) build fully on Mac or Linux
(http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-linux) but I'm
sure it'll happen
You might want to read this and think about uninstalling it ;)
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/does_google_have_rights_to_all.php
R
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Thomler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I thought it was about the same speed as Firefox 3, though memory usage
is much
On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Rae Buerckner wrote:
You might want to read this and think about uninstalling it ;)
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/does_google_have_rights_to_all.php
Just my 2 cents who had hired two lawyers to draft out policy/
copyrights/contact for my business.
The
On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Rae Buerckner wrote:
You might want to read this and think about uninstalling it ;)
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/does_google_have_rights_to_all.php
Just my 2 cents who had hired two lawyers to draft out policy/
copyrights/contact for my business.
The
The list server is duplicating posts!
You might want to read it all before you decide it may be a mistake, doesn't
read like a mistake to me!
R
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:44 PM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Rae Buerckner wrote:
You might want to read this and
Tee,
my take on the legal stuff as it may apply to bloggers and other web content
providers:
http://onblogging.com.au/2008/09/03/does-google-own-my-blog-if-i-post-through-chrome
Cheers, Andrew
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:39 PM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Rae
Question: does Chrome actually record your browsing and send that
information back to Google or are people just freaking over nothing?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee,
my take on the legal stuff as it may apply to bloggers and other web content
people are just freaking over nothing.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: does Chrome actually record your browsing and send that
information back to Google or are people just freaking over nothing?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL
If they don't have that functionality built in to chrome yet, they certainly
have written themselves a license to built that in whenever they want to.
R
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: does Chrome actually record your browsing and send that
information
Seems about par for the course.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Anton Babushkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
people are just freaking over nothing.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
46 matches
Mail list logo
