With the absolute style you've tried, a z-index may help the ie issue's.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Unsworth
Sent: 04 September 2008 05:29
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Fwd: [WSG] Position and peace of mind
--
John Unsworth wrote:
So my questions to the group are; Was the decision to write the
markup in the order I did correct or pedantic? Because if I didn't
then I wouldn't have the layout issues I'm having I'd guess.
Positioning out of visual order on a detailed level, can easily create
more
Cole, can you post a url so people can see the validator results and
review the code? Everything looks on the up-and-up from what you've
posted. I've never used the FF HTML Validator extension (is it the one
based on HTML Tidy?), so i can't speak for that. The Web Developer
extension just
Do you relocate?
Anya V. Gerasimchuk
Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services
UNIFI Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(513) 595 -2391
Levell Rampono [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/03/2008 08:49 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
To
http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net Click the Essential eBiz Solutions
logo to visit our home page
Hi All,
This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm
building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a captcha one
because they are far from accessible,
It seems the best alternative might be to have the ability to call you or
contact you in some way for verification for handicapped individuals.
regards,
kevin
This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm
building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*[image: Click the Essential eBiz Solutions logo to visit our home
page]http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net
*
* Hi All,* *This is a mixed question, I have a contact form
that I'm
reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired
visitors worked fine.
The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that
cannot be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty amazing!
kevin
Hi,
I've seen this captcha service and, according to
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:34 AM, kevin erickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired
visitors worked fine.
The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that cannot
be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty
Hi eBiz,
In this article [1] I explain the how-to a bit and offer some additional
solutions. Perhaps you could integrate those code snippets in your order
form.
[1] http://green-beast.com/blog/?p=220
Respectfully,
Mike Cherim
- Original Message -
From: Essential eBiz Solutions
Well I can vouch that reCAPTCHA doesn't work for hearing impaired or
deaf folks. There have been times when I've been unable to decipher
the warped text visually (and I'm not sight impaired) - and audio is
no use at all.
Contact form spam should never be the problem of the user. And there
Mike your still a god in my eyes, even more so now. Many thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike at Green-Beast.com
Sent: 04 September 2008 17:12
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help
Hi eBiz,
In this
If you want to avoid captchas, my recommendation would be to add a
question that would foil a robot. Just explain that this field is for
that specifically.
Something like:
fieldset
legendHuman Verification/legend
pThis section is used to thwart evil spam robots. Fill in the correct
I am located in Florida, I am available 24/7. I do not let a phone call go
unnoticed.
I wish I could re-locate, however I will not put a company through the cost
of moving me and my family.
I would feel more comfortable working from my home office I have
established.
Please let me know if you
Hi Joseph,
?php
// check the answer
if ($_POST['human_verifier'] != 'blue')
{
// incorrect
echo 'Robot! Get out!');
}
else
{
// correct
echo 'Welcome, Human.';
}
?
You can make that a little more foolproof by setting the case of the text
before matching, upper or lower it doesn't matter, but
Pretty much what I was lucking for, similar to Mike's solution. Work on a
screen reader to unlike captcha.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Taylor
Sent: 04 September 2008 18:02
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG]
Good call.
?php
// check the answer
if (strtolower($_POST['human_verifier']) != 'blue')
{
// incorrect
echo 'Robot! Get out!');
}
else
{
// correct
echo 'Welcome, Human.';
}
?
I agree that Mike's form is well made too. It takes my concept and adds
in all the other pieces you'd want for the
Hi,
just another vote for Mike's GB Contact Form - been using it successfully
for a while now and it works beautifully.
Had tried a lot of other options and form setup - this one is by far the
best, in my humble opinion anyway.
So - thank you, Mike ;)
Prisca
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:48 PM,
Hi,
You can send your profile and portfolio to this company. Sometimes we
outsource some projects.
thanks regards,
n i s h a n t h
director- media operations
p.o box: 8284 | dubai | u . a . e
tel: 04 273 6885 fax: 04 273 6884
http://www.amdeas.com/ www.amdeas.com |||
I can't believe this is still going. You guys are ALL off-topic for
this list. Please take your employment discussions elsewhere (like,
off-list).
2008/9/4 nishanth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
You can send your profile and portfolio to this company. Sometimes we
outsource some projects.
--
--
ADMIN THREAD CLOSED
The employment aspect of this thread has been closed for two reasons
1. This list does not allow posts about employment opportunities. If you
wish tyo post a job, email me offlist and I can add it to the weekly email
that goes out to all members.
2. This discussion has
Good gosh, can you not see that people are only HUMAN and make MISTAKES for
the love of god,
Stop getting so huffy. I guess next to you being perfect nobody can make a
mistake!
No wonder I hardly post anything to this. I would hate to upset those that
are to perfect for this world!
Just got chrome on my XP machine. Looks good but I am concerned about
accessibility. Again, thanks Steve.
James Jeffery
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:19 PM, kevin erickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thank you for the report Steve. It was very helpful!!
kevin
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:23:15 -0400,
what do you all think about the way chrome re-sizes (ctrl +)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First i thought it felt unfinished, but then the minimal design grew on
me. Very uncluttered. And drop down menus consolodate a lot of screen
real estate. Well designed gui, all its needs now is firebug and id use
it. And i like the incognito windows, thats a slick feature.
I believe it's a know bug, a missing feature. It's something David Pogue
mentioned in his column on the Chrome
releasehttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/technology/personaltech/03pogue.html,
his most recent column:
At the moment, for example, there's no way to e-mail a Web page to someone,
no
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been
raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta.
Cheers
Adam
- Original Message -
From: James Jeffery
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:13 AM
Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3416 (20080904) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3416 (20080904) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32
Nancy Gill wrote:
I can't figure out why it has to load the process three times in order
to run.
the google explanation:
http://blogoscoped.com/google-chrome/3
--
Chris Knowles
***
List Guidelines:
Adam wrote:
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been
raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta.
Isn't that what beta is for - to get feedback for further development?
And Gmail is still in beta after several years.
Nancy Gill wrote:
I can't figure out why it has to load the process three times in order
to run.
It runs every tab in a separate process, plus one main one for the
browser. This means a crash on a single page won't bring down the whole
browser, it also means there is, for the first time in
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Martin
Sent: 04 September 2008 23:33
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been
raised - but I do
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...
document:
Hi Todd -
Link is here: http://www.koisis.com/.framework/-public/index.php
Yes, I have verified that it's HTML validator - which is based upon Tidy -
extension that is giving me this info (it's not an error or even a warning).
As mentioned, all my pages do validate (as per HTML
Hello everyone!
I got a problem here. I´m trying to get the header of my website fixed at
the top on a z-index but it´s not working. My website iswww.laertjansen.com
http://www.laertjansen.com%20
I just want to fix the info at the top but what happens can be seen
On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Laert Jansen wrote:
The Header´s css is:
#header {
margin:auto;
width:894px;
margin-bottom:26px;
position:fixed;
z-index:100;
Impressive work The Jacob Ferreira is very barackobama though. Is
barackobama.com your work?
One of my client
As far as I'm aware XHTML strict was never programmed to acknowledge
attributes, this was something that was only available in the transitional
format. If you remove language=javascript1.2 then you're page will
validate perfectly.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you may need to put some more positioning on the header and some leading room
above the folio to account for the gap required for FF and IE7 and possibly
others.
I'd ask the question on the relevance of maintaining the header as it is so
large and will take up a lot of screen real estate
Cole, from what i can see, if i remove the comment after your head tag
!--PUT THE PROPER LANGUAGE ID HERE?-- , it changes from content
looks like transitional to a matching content looks like Strict.
Seems in almost every case where i use that extension, it does give
you some some message,
signature database 3416 (20080904) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
cole,
i get the same thing in the ff html validator. copied and pasted the
w3c doc type into my document. must be a bug or something. as long
as your document validates through the online validator, i wouldn't
worry about it. it's in the format the w3c recommends.
cheers,
dwain
On Wed, Sep 3,
From: Adam Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been
raised - but I do think that we need to
Essential, Todd and Dwain -
Thank you all for your input.
Have removed the javascript language attributes as well as the errant html
comment and now the Tidy message I get matches Strict/Strict
Thanks again to everyone!
Cole
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hey,
I saw a funny one once. A site had a really basic math problem. Like 4x2
or something. Type in the answer and you submitted the form. Because
it's HTML it's accessible.
IceKat.
Scott Elcomb wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:34 AM, kevin erickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reCAPTCHA
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been
raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta.
Well... Google has a track record of a) keeping products in permanent beta;
and b) never getting around to that pesky accessibility bit. So,
46 matches
Mail list logo