RE: [WSG] Position and peace of mind

2008-09-04 Thread Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
With the absolute style you've tried, a z-index may help the ie issue's. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Unsworth Sent: 04 September 2008 05:29 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Fwd: [WSG] Position and peace of mind --

Re: [WSG] Position and peace of mind

2008-09-04 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
John Unsworth wrote: So my questions to the group are; Was the decision to write the markup in the order I did correct or pedantic? Because if I didn't then I wouldn't have the layout issues I'm having I'd guess. Positioning out of visual order on a detailed level, can easily create more

Re: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like...

2008-09-04 Thread Todd Budnikas
Cole, can you post a url so people can see the validator results and review the code? Everything looks on the up-and-up from what you've posted. I've never used the FF HTML Validator extension (is it the one based on HTML Tidy?), so i can't speak for that. The Web Developer extension just

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-04 Thread AGerasimchuk
Do you relocate? Anya V. Gerasimchuk Web Designer, IT - Web Shared Services UNIFI Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] (513) 595 -2391 Levell Rampono [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/03/2008 08:49 PM Please respond to wsg@webstandardsgroup.org To

[WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net Click the Essential eBiz Solutions logo to visit our home page Hi All, This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a captcha one because they are far from accessible,

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread kevin erickson
It seems the best alternative might be to have the ability to call you or contact you in some way for verification for handicapped individuals. regards, kevin This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Gonzalo González Mora
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *[image: Click the Essential eBiz Solutions logo to visit our home page]http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net * * Hi All,* *This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread kevin erickson
reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired visitors worked fine. The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that cannot be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty amazing! kevin Hi, I've seen this captcha service and, according to

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Scott Elcomb
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:34 AM, kevin erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired visitors worked fine. The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that cannot be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Hi eBiz, In this article [1] I explain the how-to a bit and offer some additional solutions. Perhaps you could integrate those code snippets in your order form. [1] http://green-beast.com/blog/?p=220 Respectfully, Mike Cherim - Original Message - From: Essential eBiz Solutions

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Vicki Stanton
Well I can vouch that reCAPTCHA doesn't work for hearing impaired or deaf folks. There have been times when I've been unable to decipher the warped text visually (and I'm not sight impaired) - and audio is no use at all. Contact form spam should never be the problem of the user. And there

RE: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
Mike your still a god in my eyes, even more so now. Many thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike at Green-Beast.com Sent: 04 September 2008 17:12 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help Hi eBiz, In this

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Joseph Taylor
If you want to avoid captchas, my recommendation would be to add a question that would foil a robot. Just explain that this field is for that specifically. Something like: fieldset legendHuman Verification/legend pThis section is used to thwart evil spam robots. Fill in the correct

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-04 Thread Graphics Web Designing, LLC
I am located in Florida, I am available 24/7. I do not let a phone call go unnoticed. I wish I could re-locate, however I will not put a company through the cost of moving me and my family. I would feel more comfortable working from my home office I have established. Please let me know if you

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Mike at Green-Beast.com
Hi Joseph, ?php // check the answer if ($_POST['human_verifier'] != 'blue') { // incorrect echo 'Robot! Get out!'); } else { // correct echo 'Welcome, Human.'; } ? You can make that a little more foolproof by setting the case of the text before matching, upper or lower it doesn't matter, but

RE: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
Pretty much what I was lucking for, similar to Mike's solution. Work on a screen reader to unlike captcha. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Taylor Sent: 04 September 2008 18:02 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG]

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Joseph Taylor
Good call. ?php // check the answer if (strtolower($_POST['human_verifier']) != 'blue') { // incorrect echo 'Robot! Get out!'); } else { // correct echo 'Welcome, Human.'; } ? I agree that Mike's form is well made too. It takes my concept and adds in all the other pieces you'd want for the

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Prisca schmarsow
Hi, just another vote for Mike's GB Contact Form - been using it successfully for a while now and it works beautifully. Had tried a lot of other options and form setup - this one is by far the best, in my humble opinion anyway. So - thank you, Mike ;) Prisca On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:48 PM,

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-04 Thread nishanth
Hi, You can send your profile and portfolio to this company. Sometimes we outsource some projects. thanks regards, n i s h a n t h director- media operations p.o box: 8284 | dubai | u . a . e tel: 04 273 6885 fax: 04 273 6884 http://www.amdeas.com/ www.amdeas.com |||

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-04 Thread Christian Montoya
I can't believe this is still going. You guys are ALL off-topic for this list. Please take your employment discussions elsewhere (like, off-list). 2008/9/4 nishanth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, You can send your profile and portfolio to this company. Sometimes we outsource some projects. -- --

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon... ADMIN THREAD CLOSED

2008-09-04 Thread russ - maxdesign
ADMIN THREAD CLOSED The employment aspect of this thread has been closed for two reasons 1. This list does not allow posts about employment opportunities. If you wish tyo post a job, email me offlist and I can add it to the weekly email that goes out to all members. 2. This discussion has

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-04 Thread Graphics Web Designing, LLC
Good gosh, can you not see that people are only HUMAN and make MISTAKES for the love of god, Stop getting so huffy. I guess next to you being perfect nobody can make a mistake! No wonder I hardly post anything to this. I would hate to upset those that are to perfect for this world!

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-04 Thread James Jeffery
Just got chrome on my XP machine. Looks good but I am concerned about accessibility. Again, thanks Steve. James Jeffery On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:19 PM, kevin erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Thank you for the report Steve. It was very helpful!! kevin On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:23:15 -0400,

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread kevin mcmonagle
what do you all think about the way chrome re-sizes (ctrl +) *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread kevin mcmonagle
First i thought it felt unfinished, but then the minimal design grew on me. Very uncluttered. And drop down menus consolodate a lot of screen real estate. Well designed gui, all its needs now is firebug and id use it. And i like the incognito windows, thats a slick feature.

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread Fred Ballard
I believe it's a know bug, a missing feature. It's something David Pogue mentioned in his column on the Chrome releasehttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/technology/personaltech/03pogue.html, his most recent column: At the moment, for example, there's no way to e-mail a Web page to someone, no

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-04 Thread Adam Martin
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta. Cheers Adam - Original Message - From: James Jeffery To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:13 AM

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread Nancy Gill
Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3416 (20080904) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread Fred Ballard
: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3416 (20080904) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread Chris Knowles
Nancy Gill wrote: I can't figure out why it has to load the process three times in order to run. the google explanation: http://blogoscoped.com/google-chrome/3 -- Chris Knowles *** List Guidelines:

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-04 Thread Webb, KerryA
Adam wrote: Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta. Isn't that what beta is for - to get feedback for further development? And Gmail is still in beta after several years.

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread Rob Crowther
Nancy Gill wrote: I can't figure out why it has to load the process three times in order to run. It runs every tab in a separate process, plus one main one for the browser. This means a crash on a single page won't bring down the whole browser, it also means there is, for the first time in

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-04 Thread Steve Green
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Martin Sent: 04 September 2008 23:33 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon??? Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been raised - but I do

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-04 Thread lisa . kerrigan
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon... document:

RE: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like...

2008-09-04 Thread Cole Kuryakin
Hi Todd - Link is here: http://www.koisis.com/.framework/-public/index.php Yes, I have verified that it's HTML validator - which is based upon Tidy - extension that is giving me this info (it's not an error or even a warning). As mentioned, all my pages do validate (as per HTML

[WSG] Z-index

2008-09-04 Thread Laert Jansen
Hello everyone! I got a problem here. I´m trying to get the header of my website fixed at the top on a z-index but it´s not working. My website iswww.laertjansen.com http://www.laertjansen.com%20 I just want to fix the info at the top but what happens can be seen

Re: [WSG] Z-index

2008-09-04 Thread tee
On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Laert Jansen wrote: The Header´s css is: #header { margin:auto; width:894px; margin-bottom:26px; position:fixed; z-index:100; Impressive work The Jacob Ferreira is very barackobama though. Is barackobama.com your work? One of my client

RE: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like...

2008-09-04 Thread Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
As far as I'm aware XHTML strict was never programmed to acknowledge attributes, this was something that was only available in the transitional format. If you remove language=javascript1.2 then you're page will validate perfectly. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WSG] Z-index

2008-09-04 Thread William Donovan
you may need to put some more positioning on the header and some leading room above the folio to account for the gap required for FF and IE7 and possibly others. I'd ask the question on the relevance of maintaining the header as it is so large and will take up a lot of screen real estate

Re: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like...

2008-09-04 Thread Todd Budnikas
Cole, from what i can see, if i remove the comment after your head tag !--PUT THE PROPER LANGUAGE ID HERE?-- , it changes from content looks like transitional to a matching content looks like Strict. Seems in almost every case where i use that extension, it does give you some some message,

Re: [WSG] Google chrome...

2008-09-04 Thread Michael Horowitz
signature database 3416 (20080904) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join

Re: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like...

2008-09-04 Thread dwain
cole, i get the same thing in the ff html validator. copied and pasted the w3c doc type into my document. must be a bug or something. as long as your document validates through the online validator, i wouldn't worry about it. it's in the format the w3c recommends. cheers, dwain On Wed, Sep 3,

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-04 Thread Al Sparber
From: Adam Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon??? Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been raised - but I do think that we need to

RE: [WSG] DocType Given is... SOLVED

2008-09-04 Thread Cole Kuryakin
Essential, Todd and Dwain - Thank you all for your input. Have removed the javascript language attributes as well as the errant html comment and now the Tidy message I get matches Strict/Strict Thanks again to everyone! Cole _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread Aldona
Hey, I saw a funny one once. A site had a really basic math problem. Like 4x2 or something. Type in the answer and you submitted the form. Because it's HTML it's accessible. IceKat. Scott Elcomb wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:34 AM, kevin erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: reCAPTCHA

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-04 Thread Ben Buchanan
Hey guys... it is great that talk about accessibility and chrome has been raised - but I do think that we need to wait until it is out of beta. Well... Google has a track record of a) keeping products in permanent beta; and b) never getting around to that pesky accessibility bit. So,