RE: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Foskett, Mike
Both my previous and current employer are XHTML strict: http://www.tesco.com/ http://becta.org.uk/ Tesco is a .net site. Mike Foskett -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Milner Sent: 08 October 2008 03:23 To:

Re: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Todd Baker
I'm also a front end developer working with .NET all the time. .NET is a BASTARD to get to validate. Its possible but its hard work1 Visual Studio changes case on things like onClick etc and whilst they are not biggies they are frustrating. As Chris pointed out it pumps out heaps of script and

Re: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Jamie Stewart
Give this one a try. http://www.mddus.com I've just finished this off, I didn't do the mark up on this so please ignore the standard, the only thing to note is it's .Net and it validates. The only reason it might not validate is user content but as far as .Net code goes there should be no

Re: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Gareth Senior
Tesco.com doesn't validate. The Becta one does, but it's PHP. The challenge continues! On 08/10/2008 09:33, Foskett, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both my previous and current employer are XHTML strict: http://www.tesco.com/ http://becta.org.uk/ Tesco is a .net site. Mike Foskett

Re: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread sri ni
Sorry, I didn't test whole site. most of the sub folders has error. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM, sri ni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check the image. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Gareth Senior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tesco.com doesn't validate. The Becta one does, but it's PHP.

RE: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Peter Goddard
Hi I'm a front and backend developer using .NET and it is certainly tricky to get those Visual Studio inserted items to validate. However there are some best practices for this. Use web controls with full control over the markup and the latest 3.5 version stuff certainly helps (FormView, CSS

RE: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Spellacy, Michael
I've built a couple XHTML 1.0 strict sites via .NET. Let me know how this goes for ya: http://careers.deloitte.com/sbf/default.aspx Regards, Spell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of silky Sent: Tue 10/7/2008 11:25 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re:

RE: [WSG] Uppercase Tag Names

2008-10-08 Thread Erickson, Kevin (DOE)
Hello All, This looks like a really good cause. Please sign the petition to reopen the Accessibility Institute at the University of Texas created by the late John Slatin http://www.molly.com/2008/04/07/the-john-slatin-fund-accessibility-proj ect/ and colleagues here:

RE: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Rachel Radford
It can be done... although hard to achieve using the webforms .net, and I found it hard to find an example! Here is one that validates xhtml strict and is .Net: http://www.miloclinic.com/ Ironically enough it's the blog that is in Wordpress that doesn't validate! Although that is easy enough to