Breton
Thanks for your time in explaining the intricacies and intrigues of
Object Oriented Programming.
Very enlightening. Thanks greatly
Simon
artatwork.com.au
On 24/10/2008, at 11:58 AM, Breton
Hi guys, am working on a project where i need to make a drop down list menu
populate another drop down list.
I actually dont need the intial value to be Select fomr list
Here is my code source:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 24 October 2008 02:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
Oh, most definitely agreed. Sorry if I started an argument, I only
wanted to know
what it was. I
...
As others have said, most other OO languages implement class-based
inheritance, often as a result of their linear underpinnings. People who
are used to this approach, then go through some horrible kludges to
simulate this unnecessarily in JavaScript apps, and then complain that
the
Word.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 24/10/2008, at 11:32 PM, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based.
It can be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object
Orientation as it is in languages such as
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you ask people who are truly expert with JavaScript, they will all
tell you that it _is_ Object-Oriented, not least because it is entirely
object-based: the first rule of JavaScript is: Everything is an object.
A function is an
I don't think Javascript is Object-Based, because I can just write a
function that prints instead of using an object. And even though
Javascript has objects, I think the style of writing it is more
accurately described by the prototype model.
You can print Hello, world in Ruby without
A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online
tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to
write javascript?
Thanks,
Nancy
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Rimantas Liubertas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Javascript is Object-Based,
Hey Nancy,
You might can try using w3schools.com. On my delicious bookmarks page,
delicious.com/irontombraider, I do have some JavaScript pages bookmarked.
Later,
Brett
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any
2008/10/24 James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based. It can
be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object Orientation as it is
in languages such as C++.
Two serious problems with this statement: First, the prototype system
is
2008/10/24 Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online
tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to
write javascript?
Well, not a comprehensive learn-javascript-from-scratch course, but
this is a really good place
If you want to really rock the javascript, I'd go pick up pragmatics
book
http://www.pragprog.com/titles/cppsu/prototype-and-script-aculo-us
I became a rockstar at javascript after this book
On 24-Oct-08, at 3:35 PM, liorean wrote:
2008/10/24 Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A bit off
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online
tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to
write javascript?
Thanks,
Nancy
This is the best javascript lesson book online
Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information. So why?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online
W3Schools is S 1995
On 24-Oct-08, at 6:59 PM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information.
So why?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brett Patterson wrote:
Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information. So why?
They have a lot of bad information - and spotting the difference is hard
if you are trying to learn from them.
--
David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/
David Dorward wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information. So why?
They have a lot of bad information - and spotting the difference is hard
if you are trying to learn from them.
I second that. They actually have a LOT more bad
Good morning
http://www.westernwebdesign.com.au/EWAN/index.html
Two pages uploaded: Home and Operation. Does anyone know why the
font-size (specified in css - body 80%) is different on these two
pages? Home is the correct one, but it is bigger on the second page and
the succeeding page
Because all the paragraphs are wrapped into a h2
h2OPERATIONh2
pThe network has an executive committee who have been meeting monthly
since 1996. This committee discusses and acts on
EWAN busin
The h2 after OPERATION hasn't been closed.
Cheers,
Johan
PS. I don't think this is a Support
Thanks Johan - stupid of me!
Lyn
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
