The the W3C HTML working group is currently debating the usefulness of
HTML 5: The Markup Language http://shrinkster.com/13zy vs HTML 5
A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML
http://shrinkster.com/13zz as normative documents for web developers
to use as a reference point in their
I would love to get your critical comments on Danny Goodman's JavaScript Bible
http://ca.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470069163.html
I'm updating the book to its 7th edition and am making some
significant changes, including upgrading it to include separation of
layers progressive
Steven Faulkner wrote:
The the W3C HTML working group is currently debating the usefulness of
HTML 5: The Markup Language http://shrinkster.com/13zy vs HTML 5
A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML
http://shrinkster.com/13zz as normative documents for web developers
to use as a
Big company, worldwide infact. A great one for the resume but I failed it.
I was brought in at the end of the project to fix some bugs. Let me just say
that from viewing the source it was majorly flawed! I spent 6 hours on it
before handing in the towel right near their deadline. The CSS was
Which site?
James Jeffery wrote:
Big company, worldwide infact. A great one for the resume but I failed it.
I was brought in at the end of the project to fix some bugs. Let me
just say that from viewing the source it was majorly flawed! I spent 6
hours on it before handing in the towel right
Unfortunate, you as a developer, and the rest of world to have to view
it, and for those original developers as they won't be able to learn
from your wisdom.
I've had similar cases myself, and refused to put my name to those
projects for the same reasons.
It's just the way things are
