Ben Lau wrote:
Are there any (seriously) bad implications of having empty DIVs
around your HTML document?
I understand from that that you mean "nested divs", for multiple
backgrounds etc.
A few extra divs means nothing other than extra weight, but I have
managed to break a few older browsers
Dessde el 9 al 27 de Febrero me encontraré de vacaciones.
Sus requerimientos relacionados con Soluciones Verticales por favor copiarlos a
Natalia Lillo
Cordialmente,
Rubén Valenzuela T.
Jefe de proyectos soluciones verticales
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Joseph Taylor wrote:
That's a great link. It also shows that an extra empty element, while it may
be "the easy way out" works across the board without side effects of any
kind.
Yes it is mixing content and presentation.
Many DIVs (and SPANs) are, in fact, used for pr
While the does represent "nothing" in a way, it is something
and I would say that it's use would be slighty worse than a purely
empty element.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Designer/Developer
---
Sites by Joe, LLC
"Clean, Simple & Elegant Web Design"
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Ben,
That's a great link. It also shows that an extra empty element, while
it may be "the easy way out" works across the board without side
effects of any kind.
Yes it is mixing content and presentation.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Designer/Developer
---
Sites by Joe, L
Good morning,
Our company currently builds our secure websites on the IBM WebSphere
platform using JavaServerPages. We are now just starting to do a proof of
concept of the IBM Portal technology with the thought of moving the sites
to portal. We are also considering switching from JSPs to Java
Wow... Learned a lot on this topic. Actually I'm using "overflow:auto"
but be careful, when zoom in the page sometimes that can break your
layout.
--
Regards,
Juarez P. A. Filho
Front-End Developer and Web Consultant
http://juarezpaf.com
"The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of
On a side note, there is a Firefox addon that reproduces JAWS-like
output (in text), called Fangs. Link:
http://www.standards-schmandards.com/projects/fangs/
- James
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.
On 9/2/09 02:44, Gerard Hynes (Gmail) wrote:
I'm not expert about screen readers, but I did run a site I upgraded
through JAWS with some interesting results. The site had alot of
due to the CMS they were using and JAWS would translate
this to/speak out "blank" which wasn't ideal. Am not sure i
Isn't CSS about seperating presentation from content? You apply it once in your
CSS as opposed to multiple times in your HTML.
In actual fact, if you're only developing for IE6+, Firefox 2+, Webkit
Browsers, Opera, you only need the overflow:auto; usually.
-Original Message-
From: li.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On 9/2/09 07:45, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
How can CSS overflow replace ?
See http://www.ejeliot.com/blog/59
Thanks, but I find the extra DIV no more objectionable than the
hackery and extra CSS described in that article.
--
Chr
On 9/2/09 07:45, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
How can CSS overflow replace ?
See http://www.ejeliot.com/blog/59
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webs
12 matches
Mail list logo