Jon,
I submitted the tool on the accessify forum for comment.
http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=13098
Some interesting comments there.
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Foskett, Mike
Sent: 17
There seem to be some Microformats proponents on the list, but I
don't recall much mention of RDFa.
I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on their relative merits, both
immediately and in the longer term?
Thanks,
Andrew Maben
www.andrewmaben.net
and...@andrewmaben.com
In a well designed
On 27/2/09 16:12, Andrew Maben wrote:
There seem to be some Microformats proponents on the list, but I don't
recall much mention of RDFa.
I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on their relative merits, both
immediately and in the longer term?
It might be helpful if you described the problem
Den 2009-02-09 03:02, Joseph Taylor skrev:
I wouldn't worry about document.write examples too much.
You just need to keep in mind that the book is designed to teach the
language from scratch, and quite possibly the reader hasn't scripted
before.
Starting from point zero, document.write is a
The Webkit Framework is installed within the installation directory?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
You might could try the custom installation when installing and then
creating and naming a different folder in your Program Files
I got fed up trying to deal with multiple browser issues. First you have the
issues with IE6 in MultipleIE, now this. Anyway, I just use VMs. Very
pain-free.
- James
***
List Guidelines:
You might could try the custom installation when installing and then
creating and naming a different folder in your Program Files folder...name
it something different than the currently installed Safari browser's
folder...
--
Brett P.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Gregorio Espadas
Hi,
You could run a nightly build:
http://nightly.webkit.org/
If you find out what build the 4 Beta is, you can get that (or the
nearest) build from the Windows build archive at:
http://nightly.webkit.org/builds/trunk/win/1
HTH,
Nick.
On Thu, February 26, 2009 2:30 pm, Gregorio Espadas wrote:
daniel wrote:
it would be much more interesting to discuss IE8's compliance again.
All compliant sites that I've made render fine in Safari 3 4 and
FIrefox 3 but always fail to work 100% on IE...
It isn't about standard compliance for your sites, but which standard
IE8 is limited to - CSS
sorry to have passed along misinformation regarding which was the
first browser to pass the Acid 3 Test. It still passes the test very
very well, and is a decent benchmark to address the original question.
On Feb 26, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Dyre Hult wrote:
Opera 10 was unveiled already last
Hi,
Does anyone have input on what is a good Web standards e-commerce solution?
Thanks,
Kevin
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009
6:43 AM
Thank you
Sent from my Centro Wireless Device.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Budnikas to...@missiondata.com
Subj: Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4
Date: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:23 pm
Size: 4K
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
according to Mr. Andrew Lyle:Safari 4 is the first web browser to pass
dude!
You not on a mac? See you next week!
Dave Citect Turner
From: Levell Rampono lev...@pro-perspective.com
Sent: 26 February 2009 15:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Safari Beta 4
Handling it very, very well and I'm
running on a
Handling it very, very well and I'm running on a PC!
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Todd Budnikas
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2009 3:07 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4
according to Mr. Andrew Lyle:
Safari 4
14 matches
Mail list logo