[WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Marvin Hunkin
hi.
looking for a free web hosting account that can handle side scripting, able 
to use such technologies as visual web developer, sql server, visualbasic, 
java script,etc.
i am in devonport, tasmania, australia.
i do not have a credit card, so a paid account is out of the question.
i am a blind web site designer, using the jaws for windows screen reader 
from http://www.freedomscientific.com
so if any one can help out and recommend a good one which also has plenty of 
large space.
and using windows vista, let me know.
cheers Marvin.
E-Mail: startrekc...@gmail.com
 Msn: startrekc...@msn.com
 Skype: startrekcafe
Visit my Jaws Australia Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/JawsOz/ 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] Outlook 2010

2009-06-25 Thread Conyers, Dwayne
Nathan de Vries writed:

 In other words, Microsoft are effectively creating their own HTML- 
 email standard, authorable and viewable in Microsoft tools only.


So, what else is new?

:o)


-- 
I made magic once.  Now, the sofa is gone.
http://blog.dwacon.com










***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Outlook 2010

2009-06-25 Thread Henrik Madsen


Indeed.

Here's Microsoft's 'totally up-themselves' response.

I'm sure they'd welcome comments ;)

http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/06/24/the-power-of-word-in-outlook.aspx






On 25/06/2009, at 4:37 PM, Conyers, Dwayne wrote:


Nathan de Vries writed:


In other words, Microsoft are effectively creating their own HTML-
email standard, authorable and viewable in Microsoft tools only.



So, what else is new?

:o)


--
I made magic once.  Now, the sofa is gone.
http://blog.dwacon.com










***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Rendering difference between Strict Transitional doctypes in FF, IE8 Safari

2009-06-25 Thread David Hucklesby

Damian Edwards wrote:



[...]


It only affects a few elements on the page (see links below) and is 
driving us mental.  We need to serve this page as transitional as it 
uses a 3rd party service that requires an iframe. ...



I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames of
any kind?

Cordially,
David
--



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Rendering difference between Strict Transitional doctypes in FF, IE8 Safari

2009-06-25 Thread David Dorward

David Hucklesby wrote:

I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames of
any kind?
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/elements.html clearly marks iframe as a 
feature of the Loose (AKA transitional) DTD.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread David Hucklesby

Marvin Hunkin wrote:


looking for a free web hosting account that can handle side
scripting, able to use such technologies as visual web developer, sql
server, visualbasic, java script,etc.

[...]

so if any one can help out and recommend a good one which also has
plenty of large space. and using windows vista, let me know.


Hi Marvin,
I have used a couple of free hosting accounts. Neither lasted very long. 
Unless you are prepared for the hassle of moving hosts on a frequent 
basis, I suggest you avoid free hosts.


Have you considered setting up your own computer as a server? This may 
sound ambitious, but you would get exactly the set-up you need. From 
what I see when searching for hosting, Windows hosting is often more 
costly than Unix, and certainly more rare.


Cordially,
David
--


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread Keryx Web

Hello all!

I have updated my best practice table at

http://keryx.se/resources/html-elements/

I've switched from XHTML to HTML and I've added an experimental layout 
with rotated column headers in Firefox 3.5 (JS required, but progressive 
enhancement is used).


Please report any content issues.

Please report any problems in FFox 3.5.

Known issue: The checkmarks (✓) do not work in MSIE or Webkit based 
browsers. It does not make the table less understandable though.


--
Keryx Web (Lars Gunther)
http://keryx.se/
http://twitter.com/itpastorn/
http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread Conyers, Dwayne
This is very useful.  Thanks!


-- 
I made magic once.  Now, the sofa is gone.
http://blog.dwacon.com










***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread Robert Turner

Thanks! very handy =]

Keryx Web wrote:

Hello all!

I have updated my best practice table at

http://keryx.se/resources/html-elements/

I've switched from XHTML to HTML and I've added an experimental layout 
with rotated column headers in Firefox 3.5 (JS required, but 
progressive enhancement is used).


Please report any content issues.

Please report any problems in FFox 3.5.

Known issue: The checkmarks (✓) do not work in MSIE or Webkit based 
browsers. It does not make the table less understandable though.






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread daniel a. thornbury


Very useful!

...but I would love the PDF or ODT versions to be available so I can  
print it up to stick onto the wall for quick-reference (and to make me  
look a little smarter)...


On 26/06/2009, at 5:28 AM, Keryx Web wrote:


Hello all!

I have updated my best practice table at

http://keryx.se/resources/html-elements/

I've switched from XHTML to HTML and I've added an experimental  
layout with rotated column headers in Firefox 3.5 (JS required, but  
progressive enhancement is used).


Please report any content issues.

Please report any problems in FFox 3.5.

Known issue: The checkmarks (✓) do not work in MSIE or Webkit based  
browsers. It does not make the table less understandable though.


--
Keryx Web (Lars Gunther)
http://keryx.se/
http://twitter.com/itpastorn/
http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread T. R. Valentine
2009/6/25 Keryx Web webmas...@keryx.se:

 Known issue: The checkmarks (✓) do not work in MSIE or Webkit based
 browsers.

What?! Something doesn't work in MSIE? I'm shocked.

Seriously, when will the Calc version be available?


-- 
T. R. Valentine
Your friends will argue with you. Your enemies don't care.
'When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left I buy food
and clothes.' -- Erasmus


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread Mark Harris

daniel a. thornbury wrote:


Very useful!

...but I would love the PDF or ODT versions to be available so I can 
print it up to stick onto the wall for quick-reference (and to make me 
look a little smarter)...



What Daniel is trying to say, Lars, is that the links are 404ing.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

2009-06-25 Thread Mark Huppert
This file gives me 482 errors and 6 warnings from
the W3C parser plugin for Firefox. Adobe Acrobat was
unable to parse it. 


regards

Mark


Mark Huppert
Library Web Development  
Integrated Library Management System Coordinator
Division of Information
R.G. Menzies Building (#2)
The Australian National University
ACTON ACT 0200

T: +61 02 6125 2752 
F: +61 02 6125 4063
W: http://anulib.anu.edu.au/about/

CRICOS Provider #00120C


-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Keryx Web
Sent: Friday, 26 June 2009 5:29 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] My best practice HTML sheet

Hello all!

I have updated my best practice table at

http://keryx.se/resources/html-elements/

I've switched from XHTML to HTML and I've added an experimental layout 
with rotated column headers in Firefox 3.5 (JS required, but progressive 
enhancement is used).

Please report any content issues.

Please report any problems in FFox 3.5.

Known issue: The checkmarks (✓) do not work in MSIE or Webkit based 
browsers. It does not make the table less understandable though.

-- 
Keryx Web (Lars Gunther)
http://keryx.se/
http://twitter.com/itpastorn/
http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Stewart

Hi Marvin and everyone else,

I have been doing some research into web site accessibility and I  
would be interested to know a little bit about your experiences of  
using a screen reader and also if there are any designers out there  
that have experience of designing for, or using a screen reader.


At the recent WSG meeting at the Australian museum I met a designer  
who had just spent days trying to design a site to make it usable by  
colour blind users. A much better solution may be for colour blind  
users to tweak the colours of their operating system so that  
everything on their computer displays correctly. This also means the  
user can fine tune the displayed colours to cater for their exact type  
of colour deficiency. I have heard of software that does this, but it  
does not seem to be that successful. I guess this is a similar concept  
to a screen reader that works at the level of the operating system  
rather than on a website by website basis. I would be interested to  
know of your experiences of using the web - are there some sites that  
work fine and others that are terrible? Can you tell if the designer  
has taken the time to consider screen readers? Are there lots of  
differences between different screen readers?


Your other point about free hosting eludes to another uncomfortable  
issue - whilst a lot of things on the web are cheap, they are not  
free. I guess that in many cases a screen reader compromises your use  
of the internet, possibly making you less likely to return revenue to  
the companies that are paying for everything to be online. Most people  
would love to make every website 100% accessible to everyone. However,  
if it costs a lot of time and money, but returns very little revenue  
from the small number of users with screen readers, then why should  
companies bother? In effect this is asking the majority of people  
without screen readers to subsidise the users with screen readers.  
Maybe this is the best thing to do, but I think we would all benefit  
from some discussion on the issue.


I should probably mention that I am primarily a flex/flash developer  
creating very visual sites that I doubt would work at all with a  
screen reader. But unlike every flash/flex developer I have met, I am  
very interested in accessibility, SEO, and standards.


Thanks,

Andy

--
a...@universalsprout.com

Andrew Stewart

London :: +44(0)7900 245 789
Sydney :: +61(0)416 607 113

www.universalsprout.com :: websites that sprout

On 25 Jun 2009, at 16:56, Marvin Hunkin wrote:


hi.
looking for a free web hosting account that can handle side  
scripting, able
to use such technologies as visual web developer, sql server,  
visualbasic,

java script,etc.
i am in devonport, tasmania, australia.
i do not have a credit card, so a paid account is out of the question.
i am a blind web site designer, using the jaws for windows screen  
reader

from http://www.freedomscientific.com
so if any one can help out and recommend a good one which also has  
plenty of

large space.
and using windows vista, let me know.
cheers Marvin.
E-Mail: startrekc...@gmail.com
Msn: startrekc...@msn.com
Skype: startrekcafe
Visit my Jaws Australia Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/ 
JawsOz/





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Craig Henneberry
Andrew Stewart wrote:

Most people  
would love to make every website 100% accessible to everyone. However,  
if it costs a lot of time and money, but returns very little revenue  
from the small number of users with screen readers, then why should  
companies bother?

Andrew, I don't wish it upon anyone but suppose you developed a need to use 
assistive software in the future. How would you feel about designers and 
developers not following standards that allow you to continue using the web? 

A site that is accessible using assistive technology is (by nature) more 
accessible to its wider audience. So everyone wins. Not just users of assistive 
technology.

Besides, Australian law makes web accessibility a mandatory requirement. Have 
you heard of the Bruce Maguire vs. SOCOG (Sydney Organising Committee for the 
Olympic Games) case of 1999? 

Bruce Maguire complained to the HREOC that the website of the Sydney Olympic 
Games' organising committee was not accessible as per the provisions of DDA, 
1992. The commission declared in August 2000, only a few weeks before the 
inauguration of Sydney Olympics (15th Sept. 2000), that the complainant had 
been discriminated against and ordered the SOCOG to make certain access 
provisions to be complete before the inaugural date. SOCOG failed to comply 
with this order and hence in November 2000, the HREOC fined the SOCOG a sum of 
Australian $20,000.

Regards,
Craig

-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: Friday, 26 June 2009 1:15 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

Hi Marvin and everyone else,

I have been doing some research into web site accessibility and I  
would be interested to know a little bit about your experiences of  
using a screen reader and also if there are any designers out there  
that have experience of designing for, or using a screen reader.

At the recent WSG meeting at the Australian museum I met a designer  
who had just spent days trying to design a site to make it usable by  
colour blind users. A much better solution may be for colour blind  
users to tweak the colours of their operating system so that  
everything on their computer displays correctly. This also means the  
user can fine tune the displayed colours to cater for their exact type  
of colour deficiency. I have heard of software that does this, but it  
does not seem to be that successful. I guess this is a similar concept  
to a screen reader that works at the level of the operating system  
rather than on a website by website basis. I would be interested to  
know of your experiences of using the web - are there some sites that  
work fine and others that are terrible? Can you tell if the designer  
has taken the time to consider screen readers? Are there lots of  
differences between different screen readers?

Your other point about free hosting eludes to another uncomfortable  
issue - whilst a lot of things on the web are cheap, they are not  
free. I guess that in many cases a screen reader compromises your use  
of the internet, possibly making you less likely to return revenue to  
the companies that are paying for everything to be online. Most people  
would love to make every website 100% accessible to everyone. However,  
if it costs a lot of time and money, but returns very little revenue  
from the small number of users with screen readers, then why should  
companies bother? In effect this is asking the majority of people  
without screen readers to subsidise the users with screen readers.  
Maybe this is the best thing to do, but I think we would all benefit  
from some discussion on the issue.

I should probably mention that I am primarily a flex/flash developer  
creating very visual sites that I doubt would work at all with a  
screen reader. But unlike every flash/flex developer I have met, I am  
very interested in accessibility, SEO, and standards.

Thanks,

Andy

--
a...@universalsprout.com

Andrew Stewart

 London :: +44(0)7900 245 789
 Sydney :: +61(0)416 607 113

www.universalsprout.com :: websites that sprout

On 25 Jun 2009, at 16:56, Marvin Hunkin wrote:

 hi.
 looking for a free web hosting account that can handle side  
 scripting, able
 to use such technologies as visual web developer, sql server,  
 visualbasic,
 java script,etc.
 i am in devonport, tasmania, australia.
 i do not have a credit card, so a paid account is out of the question.
 i am a blind web site designer, using the jaws for windows screen  
 reader
 from http://www.freedomscientific.com
 so if any one can help out and recommend a good one which also has  
 plenty of
 large space.
 and using windows vista, let me know.
 cheers Marvin.
 E-Mail: startrekc...@gmail.com
 Msn: startrekc...@msn.com
 Skype: startrekcafe
 Visit my Jaws Australia Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/ 
 JawsOz/




 

Re: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Maben

On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Craig Henneberry wrote:


then why should companies bother?


Um - because companies are composed of people, and because ethics  
should be an important component of people's lives? AKA Because it's  
the right thing to do.


Oh, and also because accessibility is mandated by law.

Andrew Maben

http://www.andrewmaben.net
and...@andrewmaben.com

In a well designed user interface, the user should not need  
instructions.






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Stewart
Craig, thank you for your response, this is the kind of thing that I  
am after, however you did quote the most controversial part of me  
email without the following sentence that slightly moderated it. I do  
agree that having the web 100% accessible is the goal, but what is the  
best way of getting there? I assume that we are not there at the  
moment and rewriting all the content already there is not that  
practical.


The web is moving into many complex areas of multimedia, for example  
should youtube be required by law to supply subtitles and voice-overs  
on all its videos? - maybe not, but where do you draw the line? For  
example there was a site I visited recently where you could control a  
dodgeball cannon with a webcam in real-time, firing at people in a  
warehouse somewhere in England. How would you suggest dealing with  
that site?


It is clear that a publicly funded website like that for the Olympic  
Games should be accessible, but are you suggesting that the same rules  
should apply to a high-school student doing a website for a school  
project? - again another tough line to draw. The scale of the internet  
means that the Australian laws will only have a very small impact on  
the internet as a whole.


Perhaps concentrating on improving assistive technology to cope with  
the varied state of the internet is a better solution than trying to  
improve the accessibility of websites. This would also make a lot of  
the content that is currently inaccessible accessible.


Andy


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Webb, KerryA
Andrew Stewart said:
 
 It is clear that a publicly funded website like that for the Olympic
 Games should be accessible, but are you suggesting that the same rules
 should apply to a high-school student doing a website for a school
 project? - again another tough line to draw. The scale of the internet
 means that the Australian laws will only have a very small impact on
 the internet as a whole.
 

The way the law is written is that a person has been entitled to lodge a
complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission if they find a
site inaccessible, be it SOCOG or the high school student's.
Arbitration would ensue. 

More recently though the legislation has been amended so that a
complainant can take a case directly to the state/territory Supreme
Court.  So, you won't go to jail for having an inaccessible site, but
you could be required by the Court to make it accessible, as SOCOG was.

But as previous poster Andrew said, it's the right thing to do.  That's
a good rule to follow.

Kerry 
  
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all 
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should 
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other 
person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

2009-06-25 Thread Craig Henneberry
 
Yes, so our best option is to get accessibility integrated early on in the 
development process. Obviously we are not going to re-write the web (unless 
Bruce Maguire goes to town on us).

I don't believe that integrating accessibility into a project adds a 
significant cost to a project anyway. Especially when compared to the benefits 
of doing so. But I'm pretty sure it would add a significant overhead if it's 
done as a separate process at the end. Which is probably why SOCOG didn't 
bother.

I think part of the issue is that to integrate accessibility into our projects 
and ensure that we are actually providing a benefit to the people who rely on 
it - we really need a panel of users with various vision, hearing, dexterity 
disabilities etc to test our work with... But most of us don't have that luxury.

Craig



-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On 
Behalf Of Webb, KerryA
Sent: Friday, 26 June 2009 3:26 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] accessible free web hosting account

Andrew Stewart said:
 
 It is clear that a publicly funded website like that for the Olympic
 Games should be accessible, but are you suggesting that the same rules
 should apply to a high-school student doing a website for a school
 project? - again another tough line to draw. The scale of the internet
 means that the Australian laws will only have a very small impact on
 the internet as a whole.
 

The way the law is written is that a person has been entitled to lodge a
complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission if they find a
site inaccessible, be it SOCOG or the high school student's.
Arbitration would ensue. 

More recently though the legislation has been amended so that a
complainant can take a case directly to the state/territory Supreme
Court.  So, you won't go to jail for having an inaccessible site, but
you could be required by the Court to make it accessible, as SOCOG was.

But as previous poster Andrew said, it's the right thing to do.  That's
a good rule to follow.

Kerry 
  
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all 
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should 
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other 
person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***